Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Good luck with your bet. I'm not touching this Game. Just going to ride out my series bet. |
gambling-devil | 6 |
|
|
@gambling-devil They were far from a perfect game. This team has no discipline. I have no idea what the coaches are doing. They don't know how to protect a lead in the 4th qtr. They take way too many 3s early in the shot clock when leading late. Very frustrating. A better coached team, experienced team, disciplined team will easily beat this team in a 7 game series... but they should be able to get by the Bucks given their injuries. |
gambling-devil | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by StraightWagers:
I hate LeBron, but that's just me. Anyways, seems like Lakers don't mind facing Nuggets and actually are embracing it. I have this weird feeling they knock out Denver. Them winning that in season tourney, the whole ref thing last few games appears to me they are on a path that goes at least thru Nuggs if not to the West Finals. As much as that Lakers/Warriors ML +225 bet just didn't make sense to me last night, Lakers winning to face Denver then losing the series just doesn't make sense to me either. So, at +250 series is that a bad bet? Thanks for the help my good Covers colleagues. Something to think about... instead of betting to win series Maybe bet Lal to win west or win it all. |
StraightWagers | 35 |
|
|
Pacers 4-1 but had Mathurin those games. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if Freak misses entire series. If he can't play game 1 what are the odds they play him game 3 down 2-0 and risking an even bigger injury.. but I do think they'll schedule series to give Giannis max recovery time. Doc sucks. Dame wants out. Just seems like another early exit like 2023. |
Indydog | 7 |
|
|
@smellieflower That mostly follows my logic. This isn't based on facts, but from observations over the years it seems like the Hawks and Bucks always give the Pacers problems. But I agree the Pacers have worked through their post-trade issues (losing chemistry with Buddy and integrating Pascal)... and I even think Ty may have been playing through an injury post ASG. Whereas the Bucks have been a mess all year and I think they actually took a step back with Doc. My thought is Pacers get game 1 and get home court. And if Freak comes back I seriously doubt he's close to 100% otherwise he would be playing game 1. |
Indydog | 7 |
|
|
So I liked Pacers odds to win series before Freak news. Now the series is even money. I really like Pacers to win series but obviously the value is gone. If anyone has thoughts on this series I welcome the input. Thanks |
Indydog | 7 |
|
|
@vinny36 Learn how to win with class man. I capped game exactly as you did but why do you need to talk crap in someone else's post? Take your win and move on. Bags, best of luck in baseball and all other sports the remainder of the Year. |
LB_Dirtbags | 64 |
|
|
Yes, pur #2 shooting 3s. But that's based of everyone doubling Edey. Uconn won't have to double much. And uconn guards faster stronger bigger more athletic. They're going to struggle from 3s this game. Smith couldn't throw it in the ocean last game. |
LB_Dirtbags | 64 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vinny36:
@LB_Dirtbags You are a respected capper on this site but you continue to make no sense when it comes to UConn games. Edey is slow, stands up with the ball, as evidenced by his 6+turnovers when NC St doubled him after when he got the ball. UConn guards are too big and physical for nerdy Lawyer and Purdue cannot shoot threes as well as Alabama, not even close. UConn is bigger, stronger and faster, Clingan and Samson will have Edey gasping for air in the 2nd half. Purdue would not have even beat Alabama. Uconn by double digits again. UConn has been a printing press for money in their last 11 tournament games. Take the blinders off dude.
I agree with everything you said, including bags being a respected capper. But the one thing few ppl continue to not mention is Hurley being a much better coach than Painter. |
LB_Dirtbags | 64 |
|
|
Can't believe no one mentioned Hurley > Painter. I don't think anyone saying Klingan > Edey, but he can certainly play him straight up without the need to double. And whoever said the guards are even... I have no idea what you've been watching. UConn Guards are so much bigger, faster, athletic. Pur guards aren't getting wide open 3s this game. It's just not a good match up for Pur and they're not going to be able to follow the same gameplay they've used all season. |
Bitcoin777 | 31 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mak104:
Good people know who the good ones here are. No one gives a shit if you're 86-88 instead of 88-86. There are posters here who have character and most know who they are. I don't even read the "16-1" or "lock of the year" posts. I hope you continue on. BOL. Exactly what was said above. I guess I missed out on some trolling that generated this post. But ignore the noise and keep doing your thing |
Wizerguy | 66 |
|
|
Nice hit!! |
LB_Dirtbags | 75 |
|
|
@LB_Dirtbags Nice hit!! |
LB_Dirtbags | 44 |
|
|
|
KC_4_LIFE | 21 |
|
|
@LuckyBros I was backing p2p by saying Trojan should bet Boise cause he was chirping and saying col was a losing pick like uva pick. But I see it didn't come across that way. Anyway good game buffs! |
Puerta2Puerta | 29 |
|
|
@Puerta2Puerta Better yet... post your ticket taking Boise if it's such a lock. I'm riding with Col, but don't like being on the other side of Eddy. GL P2P |
Puerta2Puerta | 29 |
|
|
@Eddy_Winslow
|
KC_4_LIFE | 21 |
|
|
I'm with you on Col, but certainly don't like seeing eddy on the other side . |
KC_4_LIFE | 21 |
|
|
I bet UVA +17.5 early 2nd half. Maybe one of the dumbest bets of my life given their inability to score and close the gap. Oh well. |
MoPinkie | 14 |
|
|
@Dtr09 IDK man, but I do know they don't like you creating new accounts when you're boxed. |
SportyTrojan | 32 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.