Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Good luck. I just can't bet this game; I have no idea. |
Digitalkarma | 5 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
The regression candidates occur starting week 5. There should more plays this year as my first half model is finished and when the lines are posted there will be 8-10 more wagers. Moneylines: 1. ATL +105 2.DET +105 3. CHIC -105 4. NYJ +139 BOL to everyone this season. I like ATL and CHI, but I also like GB. Good luck. |
jowchoo | 10 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
Inside the link is the power rankings from Steve Makinen of VSIN. Makinen used to work for Statfox. Scroll 1/3 of the way down. You will see the teams in their respective divisions. The 1st highlighted area is SM PR which is Steve Makinen power rating. He updates his power ratings on a weekly basis during the regular season. I hope this helps. NFL Schedule Projections and Power Ratings - VSiN Thanks. |
TheBuddah | 26 |
|
![]() |
@theclaw That sharp analysis certainly makes WAS look overrated. Thanks. |
theclaw | 52 |
|
![]() |
Good luck. I am leaning to NYG in Week 1. |
JJWoods | 15 |
|
![]() |
Imagine turning $14 into $19,845! I can only imagine because I am NOT a great handicapper and I never make bets like that.
https://www.foxsports.com/stories/college-football/2025-big-bets-report-clemson-championship-could-mean-20k-payday-one-bettor |
DogbiteWilliams | 3 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
@DogbiteWilliams It was very clever. Thanks. |
DogbiteWilliams | 101 |
|
![]() |
ESPN said Fields should be ready for Week 1. |
Digitalkarma | 10 |
|
![]() |
I did not get one LOL for the pun. Dadgummit. |
DogbiteWilliams | 101 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Pentagon watchdog has evidence the goose-stepping MAGA Pete Hegseth’s Signal messages included classified information, sources say Once again proving that "Those with contempt for government govern contemptibly." |
fubah2 | 2438 |
|
![]() |
It's only a minor problem. |
DogbiteWilliams | 101 |
|
![]() |
Last season HOU had the #4-rated passing DEF according to NFL.com. If they have improved their horrible OFF line, C.J. Stroud could bounce back and HOU might surprise. That off-year provides a juicy price. Good luck.
|
jowchoo | 16 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by best_bets:
@maxwagers781 11+ wins means they need to win 11 or more to cash the wager. My sportsbook would have posted that as DEN Over 10.5/+180. |
best_bets | 13 |
|
![]() |
I lean ATL. Good luck. |
JoseAlonso787 | 4 |
|
![]() |
No. |
WonderWeasel | 11 |
|
![]() |
replied to
Presiden Trump calls for Washington Commanders owner to change name back to Redskins
in Penalty Box A racist bastard is fond of racist terms. Not exactly earth-shaking news. |
SarasotaSlim | 38 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
My favorite regression fade this season will be obviously KC. 11-0 in close wins, expected Wins of (-4.8) one of if not the worst I've ever seen. KC might win 4 or 5 or even more fewer games this season. Vikings would be my 2cd favorite regression fade 9-1 in close wins. (-2.9) expected wins. I strongly suspect one of these 2 teams will be a huge surprise how far they sink this season
Since you seem confident about these two potential regression Under plays, I wonder if you have considered selling one game on the RSWL's? At Heritage, these are their RSWL's: KC Under 12.5/-250 11.5/-130 10.5/+149 MIN Under 9.5/-130 8.5/+120 7.5/+214 Heritage does not let bettors buy or sell more than one game. Some regression from last year's wins has been built into those lines: KC 15 to 11.5, MIN 14 to 8.5. KC does look like a better play but MIN provides a juicier price. |
theclaw | 52 |
|
![]() |
Congratulations. |
biggiantkiller | 3 |
|
![]() |
I agree. |
Trooper64 | 17 |
|
![]() |
I also like NYG, but I have not yet placed a wager. GB is my favorite Week 1 play so far. |
theclaw | 52 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.