Over six dollars on the Chicago Edmonton game?? Seriously?? Is a number like this a once-a-year occurrence? Seems a bit ridiculous. I took the Hawks (+2.5) at -115. Can't recall six bux even last year when Boston was sreamrolling teams.
Over six dollars on the Chicago Edmonton game?? Seriously?? Is a number like this a once-a-year occurrence? Seems a bit ridiculous. I took the Hawks (+2.5) at -115. Can't recall six bux even last year when Boston was sreamrolling teams.
Over six dollars on the Chicago Edmonton game?? Seriously?? Is a number like this a once-a-year occurrence? Seems a bit ridiculous. I took the Hawks (+2.5) at -115. Can't recall six bux even last year when Boston was sreamrolling teams.
Chicago is bad and can't score. Edmonton is good and can. Is it worth it? Nah. But you see -300/-400 faves often and these two teams are in completely opposite directions.
What I'm hoping is somehow Edmonton comes out bored and flat (like last night) and gives up a goal early, id then look to take Edmn puck line live like i did last night
Chicago is bad and can't score. Edmonton is good and can. Is it worth it? Nah. But you see -300/-400 faves often and these two teams are in completely opposite directions.
What I'm hoping is somehow Edmonton comes out bored and flat (like last night) and gives up a goal early, id then look to take Edmn puck line live like i did last night
It’s the win streak, I have bet on them a few times on this streak and I don’t believe they can lose to such a bad time while on a big streak. It's uncharted territory cause it happens once a decade but if there wasn’t a streak it would be -400
It’s the win streak, I have bet on them a few times on this streak and I don’t believe they can lose to such a bad time while on a big streak. It's uncharted territory cause it happens once a decade but if there wasn’t a streak it would be -400
two years ago Colorado lost while on a 10 game win streak and 18gm home win streak to Arizona 3-2 in a shootout, that game was -550 but another factor is rest and Chicago played yesterday so the streak and no rest would seem like a sure thing with the addition of no rest to a team without their best player. They have won a few times without him though
two years ago Colorado lost while on a 10 game win streak and 18gm home win streak to Arizona 3-2 in a shootout, that game was -550 but another factor is rest and Chicago played yesterday so the streak and no rest would seem like a sure thing with the addition of no rest to a team without their best player. They have won a few times without him though
+2 goals @ +100 seems like really good value. You have to ask yourself, is +3 goals @ -265 worth a sprinkle?
you don't like -265, I wouldn't touch it.
seems like too much juice...
trying to suck Chicago money in...@+100
+2 goals @ +100 seems like really good value. You have to ask yourself, is +3 goals @ -265 worth a sprinkle?
you don't like -265, I wouldn't touch it.
seems like too much juice...
trying to suck Chicago money in...@+100
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.