Giving Detroit with an 0-7 record a 13 point cushion is begging for a cover. Not all is well in GB Land, and DET is probably hungry (many players and coaches) to have a good showing here. It is rare for them to be blown out. Rodgers is far better than Stafford. But were talking bout the numbers on the scoreboard at the end of the game. Have to side with a horrible looking mutt here in Detroit with all those points. GB will be happy to have the W against a division rival.
DET +13 (UGH feels horrible, until you cash)
CHI Bears +8 Believe it or not, Cutler is a pro QB, and moves the sticks and shows clutch-ability. Too many points.
AFC versus NFC games tend to go OVER at a 75% clip. Choose your spots. Maybe Carolina plays shootout like they did vs INDY, but will pass. Oak and Minny looks like a nice loosey goosey game; Philly and MIA could have a load of pass attempts, and MIA needs to have a W on the playoff bubble, and will have more attempts as Philly scores quick.; YG and NE PATS is the other NFC vs AFC and will get loads of attention, and this could also be a tag football game as Giants secondary can get lit up, but on the other end, Gants have a few elite receivers, Beckham a favorite target, and we could see exhibition FB.
AVOID NFL trap lines, and play the overs in the AFC vs NFC.
Giving Detroit with an 0-7 record a 13 point cushion is begging for a cover. Not all is well in GB Land, and DET is probably hungry (many players and coaches) to have a good showing here. It is rare for them to be blown out. Rodgers is far better than Stafford. But were talking bout the numbers on the scoreboard at the end of the game. Have to side with a horrible looking mutt here in Detroit with all those points. GB will be happy to have the W against a division rival.
DET +13 (UGH feels horrible, until you cash)
CHI Bears +8 Believe it or not, Cutler is a pro QB, and moves the sticks and shows clutch-ability. Too many points.
AFC versus NFC games tend to go OVER at a 75% clip. Choose your spots. Maybe Carolina plays shootout like they did vs INDY, but will pass. Oak and Minny looks like a nice loosey goosey game; Philly and MIA could have a load of pass attempts, and MIA needs to have a W on the playoff bubble, and will have more attempts as Philly scores quick.; YG and NE PATS is the other NFC vs AFC and will get loads of attention, and this could also be a tag football game as Giants secondary can get lit up, but on the other end, Gants have a few elite receivers, Beckham a favorite target, and we could see exhibition FB.
AVOID NFL trap lines, and play the overs in the AFC vs NFC.
I have a feeling that the Lions play is good but can't seem to move on it myself. I think the opposite about St. Louis; Bears + 8 is the trap. A better Bears team went in there two seasons ago and got blown out as a +4 dog. The current Rams team is also better than it was then, particularly at the QB position and the defensive line. New look, same great coach. Sure, they'll finish 8-8 like they do but can't see my Bears doing much of anything exciting on offense in this game, apart from turnovers. The Bears are "road warriors" this year with victories over the Chiefs and Chargers...therein lies the trap...I feel this line should be into the double digits. I have doubts this week. But I HOPE YOU'RE RIGHT for the sake of the Bears. BOL
I have a feeling that the Lions play is good but can't seem to move on it myself. I think the opposite about St. Louis; Bears + 8 is the trap. A better Bears team went in there two seasons ago and got blown out as a +4 dog. The current Rams team is also better than it was then, particularly at the QB position and the defensive line. New look, same great coach. Sure, they'll finish 8-8 like they do but can't see my Bears doing much of anything exciting on offense in this game, apart from turnovers. The Bears are "road warriors" this year with victories over the Chiefs and Chargers...therein lies the trap...I feel this line should be into the double digits. I have doubts this week. But I HOPE YOU'RE RIGHT for the sake of the Bears. BOL
I have a feeling that the Lions play is good but can't seem to move on it myself. I think the opposite about St. Louis; Bears + 8 is the trap. A better Bears team went in there two seasons ago and got blown out as a +4 dog. The current Rams team is also better than it was then, particularly at the QB position and the defensive line. New look, same great coach. Sure, they'll finish 8-8 like they do but can't see my Bears doing much of anything exciting on offense in this game, apart from turnovers. The Bears are "road warriors" this year with victories over the Chiefs and Chargers...therein lies the trap...I feel this line should be into the double digits. I have doubts this week. But I HOPE YOU'RE RIGHT for the sake of the Bears. BOL
Rams impressed at home as a TD fav over CLE and SF, but Bears can move the ball much better than these. Gurley a stud, and quite sure this is a low scoring rush dominated game--hard hits typical of the Rams' coach--but I think Bears can get to 17 and keep Rams within reach at 24.
I have a feeling that the Lions play is good but can't seem to move on it myself. I think the opposite about St. Louis; Bears + 8 is the trap. A better Bears team went in there two seasons ago and got blown out as a +4 dog. The current Rams team is also better than it was then, particularly at the QB position and the defensive line. New look, same great coach. Sure, they'll finish 8-8 like they do but can't see my Bears doing much of anything exciting on offense in this game, apart from turnovers. The Bears are "road warriors" this year with victories over the Chiefs and Chargers...therein lies the trap...I feel this line should be into the double digits. I have doubts this week. But I HOPE YOU'RE RIGHT for the sake of the Bears. BOL
Rams impressed at home as a TD fav over CLE and SF, but Bears can move the ball much better than these. Gurley a stud, and quite sure this is a low scoring rush dominated game--hard hits typical of the Rams' coach--but I think Bears can get to 17 and keep Rams within reach at 24.
RE: NYG at NE--If we judge by the NO Saints game, Brees had loads of time, and I can't recall even one sack or evel a hurry the pass rush was that lame. Brady will be quite all night.
RE: NYG at NE--If we judge by the NO Saints game, Brees had loads of time, and I can't recall even one sack or evel a hurry the pass rush was that lame. Brady will be quite all night.
Seahawks clearly not what they were; leading the NFL in sacks allowed; offense struggling. Arizona will build a lead and take the crowd out of the game.
Seahawks clearly not what they were; leading the NFL in sacks allowed; offense struggling. Arizona will build a lead and take the crowd out of the game.
Giving Detroit with an 0-7 record a 13 point cushion is begging for a cover. Not all is well in GB Land, and DET is probably hungry (many players and coaches) to have a good showing here. It is rare for them to be blown out. Rodgers is far better than Stafford. But were talking bout the numbers on the scoreboard at the end of the game. Have to side with a horrible looking mutt here in Detroit with all those points. GB will be happy to have the W against a division rival.
DET +13 (UGH feels horrible, until you cash)
CHI Bears +8 Believe it or not, Cutler is a pro QB, and moves the sticks and shows clutch-ability. Too many points.
AFC versus NFC games tend to go OVER at a 75% clip. Choose your spots. Maybe Carolina plays shootout like they did vs INDY, but will pass. Oak and Minny looks like a nice loosey goosey game; Philly and MIA could have a load of pass attempts, and MIA needs to have a W on the playoff bubble, and will have more attempts as Philly scores quick.; YG and NE PATS is the other NFC vs AFC and will get loads of attention, and this could also be a tag football game as Giants secondary can get lit up, but on the other end, Gants have a few elite receivers, Beckham a favorite target, and we could see exhibition FB.
AVOID NFL trap lines, and play the overs in the AFC vs NFC.
Nice call RelaxDude
What do you call an Eternal Optimist? An accordion with a beeper!
Giving Detroit with an 0-7 record a 13 point cushion is begging for a cover. Not all is well in GB Land, and DET is probably hungry (many players and coaches) to have a good showing here. It is rare for them to be blown out. Rodgers is far better than Stafford. But were talking bout the numbers on the scoreboard at the end of the game. Have to side with a horrible looking mutt here in Detroit with all those points. GB will be happy to have the W against a division rival.
DET +13 (UGH feels horrible, until you cash)
CHI Bears +8 Believe it or not, Cutler is a pro QB, and moves the sticks and shows clutch-ability. Too many points.
AFC versus NFC games tend to go OVER at a 75% clip. Choose your spots. Maybe Carolina plays shootout like they did vs INDY, but will pass. Oak and Minny looks like a nice loosey goosey game; Philly and MIA could have a load of pass attempts, and MIA needs to have a W on the playoff bubble, and will have more attempts as Philly scores quick.; YG and NE PATS is the other NFC vs AFC and will get loads of attention, and this could also be a tag football game as Giants secondary can get lit up, but on the other end, Gants have a few elite receivers, Beckham a favorite target, and we could see exhibition FB.
AVOID NFL trap lines, and play the overs in the AFC vs NFC.
Great 1st H. Looks similar to other games today when the front runner just extended and pulled away in the stretch (KC, Washington, Bears, Minny....). Arizona +4 sounds good.
Great 1st H. Looks similar to other games today when the front runner just extended and pulled away in the stretch (KC, Washington, Bears, Minny....). Arizona +4 sounds good.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.