The only thing I can think of (aside from what I want...) and based on the whole winning SU in primetime games scenario is that Atlanta will win SU and NOT COVER the spread and Pitt would win SU. Then Atlanta beats Pitt in bowl...
Now this is just a guess based on PRIMETIME SU WINNERS. Atlanta is 2-0 SU in primetime this year (only had 2 games) and Pitt is 4-0 su this year( only had 4 games)
Since Thursday night football inception going whole season, all Super Bowl winners have had undefeated primetime SU records except when pats won a few years ago they were 4-1 SU...
Atlanta and Pitt are the only teams left undefeated SU.
Green Bay went 4-2 lost to minny and wash su and pats went 3-1 lost to Seattle
The only thing I can think of (aside from what I want...) and based on the whole winning SU in primetime games scenario is that Atlanta will win SU and NOT COVER the spread and Pitt would win SU. Then Atlanta beats Pitt in bowl...
Now this is just a guess based on PRIMETIME SU WINNERS. Atlanta is 2-0 SU in primetime this year (only had 2 games) and Pitt is 4-0 su this year( only had 4 games)
Since Thursday night football inception going whole season, all Super Bowl winners have had undefeated primetime SU records except when pats won a few years ago they were 4-1 SU...
Atlanta and Pitt are the only teams left undefeated SU.
Green Bay went 4-2 lost to minny and wash su and pats went 3-1 lost to Seattle
I use different system in making my straight bet plays so it really doesn't matter to me, but I like to come up with different scenarios in my head and with friends and hope to see my systems line up and match... then I hammer it...
I use different system in making my straight bet plays so it really doesn't matter to me, but I like to come up with different scenarios in my head and with friends and hope to see my systems line up and match... then I hammer it...
The only thing I can think of (aside from what I want...) and based on the whole winning SU in primetime games scenario is that Atlanta will win SU and NOT COVER the spread and Pitt would win SU. Then Atlanta beats Pitt in bowl...
Now this is just a guess based on PRIMETIME SU WINNERS. Atlanta is 2-0 SU in primetime this year (only had 2 games) and Pitt is 4-0 su this year( only had 4 games)
Since Thursday night football inception going whole season, all Super Bowl winners have had undefeated primetime SU records except when pats won a few years ago they were 4-1 SU...
Atlanta and Pitt are the only teams left undefeated SU.
Green Bay went 4-2 lost to minny and wash su and pats went 3-1 lost to Seattle
The only thing I can think of (aside from what I want...) and based on the whole winning SU in primetime games scenario is that Atlanta will win SU and NOT COVER the spread and Pitt would win SU. Then Atlanta beats Pitt in bowl...
Now this is just a guess based on PRIMETIME SU WINNERS. Atlanta is 2-0 SU in primetime this year (only had 2 games) and Pitt is 4-0 su this year( only had 4 games)
Since Thursday night football inception going whole season, all Super Bowl winners have had undefeated primetime SU records except when pats won a few years ago they were 4-1 SU...
Atlanta and Pitt are the only teams left undefeated SU.
Green Bay went 4-2 lost to minny and wash su and pats went 3-1 lost to Seattle
4-What goes up will come down,GB winning strike will end this coming sunday.
5-Every year,there is a surprise team rise up and get to and winning the Super Bowl>>> will it be ATLANTA.
MY BET IS ON ATLANTA-4
I disagree. Cowboys and Patriots were the hottest ATS S/U for Vegas. Patriots continue to own spreads in the playoffs. I say Vegas pull Patriots out. Cowboys was pulled out. This leaves Steelers to win AFC side. Coming to NFC side, I think the game is going to be reversed.
The last time these two met, Packers held off a 1 pt loss to the hot offense Falcons. You didn't see a Ty Montgomery or a Christine Micheal... You didn't see Cobb or Cook.R The Packers had Knile Davis and their FB Ripkowski, 3rd RB Jackson, and Aaron Rodgers doing the running.
With a healthy Packers running game... we see a different game. Packers didn't have Cobb at WR that game, and they didn't have half of the secondary, hence Matt Ryan took advantage.
With Sanu and Jones contained... Freeman has to run and Packers are great stopping the run. Lucky to see this game go under.
Packers ftw. Cobb/Nelson/Adams/Cook should be able to come in and repeat what happend in 2010.
4-What goes up will come down,GB winning strike will end this coming sunday.
5-Every year,there is a surprise team rise up and get to and winning the Super Bowl>>> will it be ATLANTA.
MY BET IS ON ATLANTA-4
I disagree. Cowboys and Patriots were the hottest ATS S/U for Vegas. Patriots continue to own spreads in the playoffs. I say Vegas pull Patriots out. Cowboys was pulled out. This leaves Steelers to win AFC side. Coming to NFC side, I think the game is going to be reversed.
The last time these two met, Packers held off a 1 pt loss to the hot offense Falcons. You didn't see a Ty Montgomery or a Christine Micheal... You didn't see Cobb or Cook.R The Packers had Knile Davis and their FB Ripkowski, 3rd RB Jackson, and Aaron Rodgers doing the running.
With a healthy Packers running game... we see a different game. Packers didn't have Cobb at WR that game, and they didn't have half of the secondary, hence Matt Ryan took advantage.
With Sanu and Jones contained... Freeman has to run and Packers are great stopping the run. Lucky to see this game go under.
Packers ftw. Cobb/Nelson/Adams/Cook should be able to come in and repeat what happend in 2010.
I disagree. Cowboys and Patriots were the hottest ATS S/U for Vegas. Patriots continue to own spreads in the playoffs. I say Vegas pull Patriots out. Cowboys was pulled out. This leaves Steelers to win AFC side. Coming to NFC side, I think the game is going to be reversed.
The last time these two met, Packers held off a 1 pt loss to the hot offense Falcons. You didn't see a Ty Montgomery or a Christine Micheal... You didn't see Cobb or Cook.R The Packers had Knile Davis and their FB Ripkowski, 3rd RB Jackson, and Aaron Rodgers doing the running.
With a healthy Packers running game... we see a different game. Packers didn't have Cobb at WR that game, and they didn't have half of the secondary, hence Matt Ryan took advantage.
With Sanu and Jones contained... Freeman has to run and Packers are great stopping the run. Lucky to see this game go under.
Packers ftw. Cobb/Nelson/Adams/Cook should be able to come in and repeat what happend in 2010.
I disagree. Cowboys and Patriots were the hottest ATS S/U for Vegas. Patriots continue to own spreads in the playoffs. I say Vegas pull Patriots out. Cowboys was pulled out. This leaves Steelers to win AFC side. Coming to NFC side, I think the game is going to be reversed.
The last time these two met, Packers held off a 1 pt loss to the hot offense Falcons. You didn't see a Ty Montgomery or a Christine Micheal... You didn't see Cobb or Cook.R The Packers had Knile Davis and their FB Ripkowski, 3rd RB Jackson, and Aaron Rodgers doing the running.
With a healthy Packers running game... we see a different game. Packers didn't have Cobb at WR that game, and they didn't have half of the secondary, hence Matt Ryan took advantage.
With Sanu and Jones contained... Freeman has to run and Packers are great stopping the run. Lucky to see this game go under.
Packers ftw. Cobb/Nelson/Adams/Cook should be able to come in and repeat what happend in 2010.
All I'm saying is that it will be different. Packers played 3rd string receivers against the Falcons and they put up 32 pts, 2 of them rookie receivers had TD's. I'd say Packers came in as the underdog in the game but almost won by 1 pt.
Packers were without 7 key guys and had a weak secondary against the Falcons. Falcons couldn't contain nobody.
No Clay Mathews, no run game, no Randall Cobb, no Jared Cook... and the Packers managed to hang against the #1 offense in the league.
With a healthy Clay, Cobb, Cook, a healthy Christine Michael and Ty Montgomery at RB... I say... it's going to be the same thing the packers did to the Cowboys...
Lead early... kill the noise down... and take away the WIN.
All I'm saying is that it will be different. Packers played 3rd string receivers against the Falcons and they put up 32 pts, 2 of them rookie receivers had TD's. I'd say Packers came in as the underdog in the game but almost won by 1 pt.
Packers were without 7 key guys and had a weak secondary against the Falcons. Falcons couldn't contain nobody.
No Clay Mathews, no run game, no Randall Cobb, no Jared Cook... and the Packers managed to hang against the #1 offense in the league.
With a healthy Clay, Cobb, Cook, a healthy Christine Michael and Ty Montgomery at RB... I say... it's going to be the same thing the packers did to the Cowboys...
Lead early... kill the noise down... and take away the WIN.
All I'm saying is that it will be different. Packers played 3rd string receivers against the Falcons and they put up 32 pts, 2 of them rookie receivers had TD's. I'd say Packers came in as the underdog in the game but almost won by 1 pt.
Packers were without 7 key guys and had a weak secondary against the Falcons. Falcons couldn't contain nobody.
No Clay Mathews, no run game, no Randall Cobb, no Jared Cook... and the Packers managed to hang against the #1 offense in the league.
With a healthy Clay, Cobb, Cook, a healthy Christine Michael and Ty Montgomery at RB... I say... it's going to be the same thing the packers did to the Cowboys...
Lead early... kill the noise down... and take away the WIN.
who will be GB:WRS and RB + GB DEFF.? If you like GB do not bet now just wait until Sunday you will get better line>> might get to GB +6
All I'm saying is that it will be different. Packers played 3rd string receivers against the Falcons and they put up 32 pts, 2 of them rookie receivers had TD's. I'd say Packers came in as the underdog in the game but almost won by 1 pt.
Packers were without 7 key guys and had a weak secondary against the Falcons. Falcons couldn't contain nobody.
No Clay Mathews, no run game, no Randall Cobb, no Jared Cook... and the Packers managed to hang against the #1 offense in the league.
With a healthy Clay, Cobb, Cook, a healthy Christine Michael and Ty Montgomery at RB... I say... it's going to be the same thing the packers did to the Cowboys...
Lead early... kill the noise down... and take away the WIN.
who will be GB:WRS and RB + GB DEFF.? If you like GB do not bet now just wait until Sunday you will get better line>> might get to GB +6
who will be GB:WRS and RB + GB DEFF.? If you like GB do not bet now just wait until Sunday you will get better line>> might get to GB +6
What about the news you don't hear. Packers signed CB Bene Benwikere, Ex-Panthers, to the squad. He'll wear #32 for the Packers.
With a running game and a stronger secondary, I don't see Panthers doing the same thing.
Falcons defense has stepped up, and Green bay's offense has as well. It's almost like the a mirror of the same teams going at it.
I give my money to the guy that has 11-6 in the post season vs a 3-4 Matt Ryan.
Rodgers is NFC #1 qb most winning QB that is currently active. If you want to name the AFC side, Big ben #2 vs #1 Tom Brady. . The Green Bay/Cowboys tv ratings 48.5 million, the most-watched divisional round game in history; and above last year’s NFC Championship (45.7) and just a hair below 2015’s (49.8 million).
Now what about the Steelers and Chiefs?
Their ratings was 8% from NBC's primetime Divisional playoff game between the Packers and Cardinals on a Saturday last year.
In KC... the ratings were 55.2/72. That means 55.2 percent of the eligible KC market was watching the game, which the Steelers won 18-16. And of the people who were watching TV on Sunday night, 72 percent tuned in to the game.
The Pittsburgh market was the No. 1 in ratings for the game.
To bring tv ratings back to NFL... Packers/Steelers give NFL the best ratings.
Read more here: https://www.kansascity.com/sports/nfl/kansas-city-chiefs/article126825379.html#storylink=cpy
who will be GB:WRS and RB + GB DEFF.? If you like GB do not bet now just wait until Sunday you will get better line>> might get to GB +6
What about the news you don't hear. Packers signed CB Bene Benwikere, Ex-Panthers, to the squad. He'll wear #32 for the Packers.
With a running game and a stronger secondary, I don't see Panthers doing the same thing.
Falcons defense has stepped up, and Green bay's offense has as well. It's almost like the a mirror of the same teams going at it.
I give my money to the guy that has 11-6 in the post season vs a 3-4 Matt Ryan.
Rodgers is NFC #1 qb most winning QB that is currently active. If you want to name the AFC side, Big ben #2 vs #1 Tom Brady. . The Green Bay/Cowboys tv ratings 48.5 million, the most-watched divisional round game in history; and above last year’s NFC Championship (45.7) and just a hair below 2015’s (49.8 million).
Now what about the Steelers and Chiefs?
Their ratings was 8% from NBC's primetime Divisional playoff game between the Packers and Cardinals on a Saturday last year.
In KC... the ratings were 55.2/72. That means 55.2 percent of the eligible KC market was watching the game, which the Steelers won 18-16. And of the people who were watching TV on Sunday night, 72 percent tuned in to the game.
The Pittsburgh market was the No. 1 in ratings for the game.
To bring tv ratings back to NFL... Packers/Steelers give NFL the best ratings.
Read more here: https://www.kansascity.com/sports/nfl/kansas-city-chiefs/article126825379.html#storylink=cpy
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.