new york lol way to end it on a foul that wasnt called refs hold the key while some weird refereeing like always plus in the 2nd half
i like knicks and dont bet this stuff anymore if i do is 25-50 lol this stuff is to fake the way the refs hold the key to the house and teams just forget how to basketball
i like knicks and dont bet this stuff anymore if i do is 25-50 lol this stuff is to fake the way the refs hold the key to the house and teams just forget how to basketball
When I hear the argument "refs aren't going to call a foul at that point of the game," I don't understand that way of thinking as a ref. A foul is a foul at ANY point of the game. Or, do they instruct you in ref school to not call a foul when the game is very close? Not just in basketball, umpires in baseball have different strike zones, etc, etc. Don't know the answer to this problem, and since this problem has been going on for decades, I guess the NBA doesn't know how to solve this either. Yeah, I know one play doesn't determine a complete game, but you know what, sometimes ONE play does influence it.
When I hear the argument "refs aren't going to call a foul at that point of the game," I don't understand that way of thinking as a ref. A foul is a foul at ANY point of the game. Or, do they instruct you in ref school to not call a foul when the game is very close? Not just in basketball, umpires in baseball have different strike zones, etc, etc. Don't know the answer to this problem, and since this problem has been going on for decades, I guess the NBA doesn't know how to solve this either. Yeah, I know one play doesn't determine a complete game, but you know what, sometimes ONE play does influence it.
well the idea is it not being able for it to be proven or found by law enforcement. so they cant be looked at like at mob or have rico case. david stern already touched on the idea of nobody can prove anything and he excepts the prevailing view lol
well the idea is it not being able for it to be proven or found by law enforcement. so they cant be looked at like at mob or have rico case. david stern already touched on the idea of nobody can prove anything and he excepts the prevailing view lol
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.