props I like and will most likely put into parlays , so I wont show the parlays just what I will be putting into parlays that was it does not overwhelm others :) if I spelled that wrong and your pissed and upset oh well
these 3 parlays I put in last night....now please do not follow these unless you have done work and agree, if you think some of these are bad we go ahead and point out what ones you do not like, and please give reasoning, and please do not try and argue and say those are not the right ones on the props I have pointed out how I do these , no GOTCHA moments
3 prop over 14.5 Mobeley/over 14.5 M Turner/over 4.5 Toppin +300
3 prop over 9.5 Nesmith/Over 9.5 Nembhard/over 9.5 Jerome +125 I think if you added like Nesmith to make 2 3's this would maybe be +160 and be worth a bigger play
all these I like I think Nembhard and Nesmith over 9.5 are solid, and I do feel their actual props are good , they are starting to catch on (oddsmakers) as Nesmith is 13.5 pts and Nembhard is 12.5, they were almost always 10.5 , it was a nice money maker for awhile, so now they have went up......a tricky one is Siakam , you just do not know what guy shows up, Sunday he scored the 1st 7 of their 11 pts and it looked like it might be a big game by him yet he ended with just 17 points, and did not go over his original prop spread, Myles Turner is usually 15.5 to 17.5 he shoots the 3 very well for a 7 footer, and he is another one who can put up 20+ but Indiana has so many scorers that its hard for more than 2 to go over 25 or to have anyone get 25, they have like 7 who avg 10 pts a game or more, sometimes with Indiana its good to look at the totals for McConnell, Toppin, and Mathurin , McConnell really opens things up for them when he is in , with those 3 I think maybe playing all 3 of them to score over 4.5 pts, last game they were 11,7 and 7 which in props if you go over by a basket that's good, those 3 tonight going over 4.5 pts is +140 parlayed .....and as far as 3 point shooting props Indiana is a good team for those Nesmith has been lighting it up, getting like 3-4 or more in multiple games so far
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
this was too long for one post
props I like and will most likely put into parlays , so I wont show the parlays just what I will be putting into parlays that was it does not overwhelm others :) if I spelled that wrong and your pissed and upset oh well
these 3 parlays I put in last night....now please do not follow these unless you have done work and agree, if you think some of these are bad we go ahead and point out what ones you do not like, and please give reasoning, and please do not try and argue and say those are not the right ones on the props I have pointed out how I do these , no GOTCHA moments
3 prop over 14.5 Mobeley/over 14.5 M Turner/over 4.5 Toppin +300
3 prop over 9.5 Nesmith/Over 9.5 Nembhard/over 9.5 Jerome +125 I think if you added like Nesmith to make 2 3's this would maybe be +160 and be worth a bigger play
all these I like I think Nembhard and Nesmith over 9.5 are solid, and I do feel their actual props are good , they are starting to catch on (oddsmakers) as Nesmith is 13.5 pts and Nembhard is 12.5, they were almost always 10.5 , it was a nice money maker for awhile, so now they have went up......a tricky one is Siakam , you just do not know what guy shows up, Sunday he scored the 1st 7 of their 11 pts and it looked like it might be a big game by him yet he ended with just 17 points, and did not go over his original prop spread, Myles Turner is usually 15.5 to 17.5 he shoots the 3 very well for a 7 footer, and he is another one who can put up 20+ but Indiana has so many scorers that its hard for more than 2 to go over 25 or to have anyone get 25, they have like 7 who avg 10 pts a game or more, sometimes with Indiana its good to look at the totals for McConnell, Toppin, and Mathurin , McConnell really opens things up for them when he is in , with those 3 I think maybe playing all 3 of them to score over 4.5 pts, last game they were 11,7 and 7 which in props if you go over by a basket that's good, those 3 tonight going over 4.5 pts is +140 parlayed .....and as far as 3 point shooting props Indiana is a good team for those Nesmith has been lighting it up, getting like 3-4 or more in multiple games so far
as for Cleveland I think Mobley to get over 14.5 is a good one, and Jerome over 9.5 is solid but its -800 that's why you parlays these, its crazy to try a str up, Jerome over 14.5 is -155 its like damn 5 pts and it drops that much, but like adding him to the parlay with the other 3 it goes to +185 from +140 if Garland plays tonight I like him over 14.5 to be in a parlays, that is -325 so not that high but good for a parlays I think, I do think Mitchell gets over 24.5 again he reminds me of Jokic in that I mean when they need it those 2 just drive to the basket and pick up fouls, in my opinion it's bullshit sometimes because like last night when Denver made their run late, I think 4-5 poss's in a row for Denver ended with Jokic shooting 2 ft's, I mean it does get crazy, meanwhile the other team drives to the rim and no foul and when ever these 2 drive to the basket its always 2 shots, in the 1st game Mitchell 9 foul shots I think 8 were in the 4th qtr....Cleveland was 9/38 from 3 last game, while Indiana was 19/36 Cleveland has to make their 3's will they???
so please do not follow unless you agree, I am not trying to get anyone to follow every single thing I bet, what I do is because I can afford too, and I like doing the prop parlays my str up plays do well , and some days maybe not, but its crazy to think that anyone should bet everything I play, that's my choose, but the str ups hey if ya agree?? all the better so please relax, many people post about 3-4 plays a day but do not post parlays and stuff so do not get all worked up OH MY GOD THERE'S SO MUCH....just the str ups are my plays and what I like and i do put my money on them and i post them, i would never tell anyone how to bet, and if i am not posting plays i sure would not tell someone who is how bad they are or what they should do "grow a pair"
and I always think its funny that the opinion people are always a new person prospect which means more or less, someone went and made another account so it looks like there are more people saying what they are saying kind of sad in a way
1
and 2nd part
as for Cleveland I think Mobley to get over 14.5 is a good one, and Jerome over 9.5 is solid but its -800 that's why you parlays these, its crazy to try a str up, Jerome over 14.5 is -155 its like damn 5 pts and it drops that much, but like adding him to the parlay with the other 3 it goes to +185 from +140 if Garland plays tonight I like him over 14.5 to be in a parlays, that is -325 so not that high but good for a parlays I think, I do think Mitchell gets over 24.5 again he reminds me of Jokic in that I mean when they need it those 2 just drive to the basket and pick up fouls, in my opinion it's bullshit sometimes because like last night when Denver made their run late, I think 4-5 poss's in a row for Denver ended with Jokic shooting 2 ft's, I mean it does get crazy, meanwhile the other team drives to the rim and no foul and when ever these 2 drive to the basket its always 2 shots, in the 1st game Mitchell 9 foul shots I think 8 were in the 4th qtr....Cleveland was 9/38 from 3 last game, while Indiana was 19/36 Cleveland has to make their 3's will they???
so please do not follow unless you agree, I am not trying to get anyone to follow every single thing I bet, what I do is because I can afford too, and I like doing the prop parlays my str up plays do well , and some days maybe not, but its crazy to think that anyone should bet everything I play, that's my choose, but the str ups hey if ya agree?? all the better so please relax, many people post about 3-4 plays a day but do not post parlays and stuff so do not get all worked up OH MY GOD THERE'S SO MUCH....just the str ups are my plays and what I like and i do put my money on them and i post them, i would never tell anyone how to bet, and if i am not posting plays i sure would not tell someone who is how bad they are or what they should do "grow a pair"
and I always think its funny that the opinion people are always a new person prospect which means more or less, someone went and made another account so it looks like there are more people saying what they are saying kind of sad in a way
I explained it not sure where you bet, but where they have the points props, xfoll down it should have , 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts and so on every 5 pts , those are what i use for parlays , they will have higher juice but they are better to play parlays with , last night I did hit the 1st qtr parlays with Towns and White..... its just what I do when doing parlays unless I really like the actual spread on a couple and you always have to worry about getting hurt, or blowouts where they pull players out
2
@cd329
I explained it not sure where you bet, but where they have the points props, xfoll down it should have , 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts and so on every 5 pts , those are what i use for parlays , they will have higher juice but they are better to play parlays with , last night I did hit the 1st qtr parlays with Towns and White..... its just what I do when doing parlays unless I really like the actual spread on a couple and you always have to worry about getting hurt, or blowouts where they pull players out
over 8.5 reb's Gobert/Over 4.5 reb's Edwards/over 3.5 assist Edwards/over 2.5 assist Divincenzo/B Hield over 4.5 pts +190 half unit
and I do like Indiana again tonight you can still get 8 line has dropped maybe its the 9 points...lol so far they have all been 9 or real close and we have had 3 outright dog wins , I said I liked Indiana still as long as they shoot ok they should cover, total has dropped a half pt but I am on the Over TT Indiana
0
over 8.5 reb's Gobert/Over 4.5 reb's Edwards/over 3.5 assist Edwards/over 2.5 assist Divincenzo/B Hield over 4.5 pts +190 half unit
and I do like Indiana again tonight you can still get 8 line has dropped maybe its the 9 points...lol so far they have all been 9 or real close and we have had 3 outright dog wins , I said I liked Indiana still as long as they shoot ok they should cover, total has dropped a half pt but I am on the Over TT Indiana
@cd329 I explained it not sure where you bet, but where they have the points props, xfoll down it should have , 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts and so on every 5 pts , those are what i use for parlays , they will have higher juice but they are better to play parlays with , last night I did hit the 1st qtr parlays with Towns and White..... its just what I do when doing parlays unless I really like the actual spread on a couple and you always have to worry about getting hurt, or blowouts where they pull players out
Basically buying points. Yeah my prop bet points for nesmith starts at 12.5 and goes up, doesnt offer for me to go down on points. Didnt know you could do that on prop bets. Good luck win some cash
1
Quote Originally Posted by RUM151:
@cd329 I explained it not sure where you bet, but where they have the points props, xfoll down it should have , 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts and so on every 5 pts , those are what i use for parlays , they will have higher juice but they are better to play parlays with , last night I did hit the 1st qtr parlays with Towns and White..... its just what I do when doing parlays unless I really like the actual spread on a couple and you always have to worry about getting hurt, or blowouts where they pull players out
Basically buying points. Yeah my prop bet points for nesmith starts at 12.5 and goes up, doesnt offer for me to go down on points. Didnt know you could do that on prop bets. Good luck win some cash
and like I said we sit and watch Mitchell shoot ft's all night I do not understand how a guy can dribble backwards into a player and the defender gets the foul I mean mitchelol dribbled backwards trying to run into the guy...lol I have never seen it like in todays game where an offensive player can run into a defender and they get ft's , its going to get to where the defender has to run away from the guy...lol picture it a dribbler chasing the guy trying to fun into him...lol 23 24 ft's for one player too bad Indiana got down by 20 in the 1st qtr they could have won this game too but like I said the over 109.5 was the play I thought cmon Minny
0
and like I said we sit and watch Mitchell shoot ft's all night I do not understand how a guy can dribble backwards into a player and the defender gets the foul I mean mitchelol dribbled backwards trying to run into the guy...lol I have never seen it like in todays game where an offensive player can run into a defender and they get ft's , its going to get to where the defender has to run away from the guy...lol picture it a dribbler chasing the guy trying to fun into him...lol 23 24 ft's for one player too bad Indiana got down by 20 in the 1st qtr they could have won this game too but like I said the over 109.5 was the play I thought cmon Minny
FKNAAAAAA BABYYYYYY INIANA WINSSSSSSSS I love it even with Mitchell shooting 24 ft's and scoring nearly 50 pts and Indiana trailing Huge, they come back to steal 2 games at CLEVELAND!!! Another 9 pt road dog wins outright its the 9 points curse people I got this series going over 5.5 now watch Indiana win it in 4 wtf??? but I do have Indiana and OKC meeting in the finals
0
FKNAAAAAA BABYYYYYY INIANA WINSSSSSSSS I love it even with Mitchell shooting 24 ft's and scoring nearly 50 pts and Indiana trailing Huge, they come back to steal 2 games at CLEVELAND!!! Another 9 pt road dog wins outright its the 9 points curse people I got this series going over 5.5 now watch Indiana win it in 4 wtf??? but I do have Indiana and OKC meeting in the finals
only 2 props got me on the 1st game Nembhard not getting a 3 won the other 4 and Jerome not scoring over 9.5 and I think I posted last night about just betting Nesmith and Nembhard over 9.5 and Nesmith to make at least 2 3's usually a winner Nesmith scored 23 Nembhard got 13 his regular prop was over 11.5 just parlaying those would have been a decent prop play Nesmith with 4 3's Turner had a big night also so those 3 won and I think Haliburton went over 18.5 was his...Mobley did not play so the 3 teamer went to a 2 teamer as Toppin went over 4.5, so those 2 won Nesmith won Nembhard won hell those props if people bet them str up were winners , even if I didn't bet them they were ones I said I thought were good so pinhead can say what he wants about props Jerome lost and Nemhard getting 1 3 lost and Mitchell got over 24.5 so not sure what pinhead is talking about I only hope someone maybe put the right ones together and cashed .....
@cd329
I hope you played Nesmith and Nembhard and Turner, and Nesmith at least 2 3's
0
only 2 props got me on the 1st game Nembhard not getting a 3 won the other 4 and Jerome not scoring over 9.5 and I think I posted last night about just betting Nesmith and Nembhard over 9.5 and Nesmith to make at least 2 3's usually a winner Nesmith scored 23 Nembhard got 13 his regular prop was over 11.5 just parlaying those would have been a decent prop play Nesmith with 4 3's Turner had a big night also so those 3 won and I think Haliburton went over 18.5 was his...Mobley did not play so the 3 teamer went to a 2 teamer as Toppin went over 4.5, so those 2 won Nesmith won Nembhard won hell those props if people bet them str up were winners , even if I didn't bet them they were ones I said I thought were good so pinhead can say what he wants about props Jerome lost and Nemhard getting 1 3 lost and Mitchell got over 24.5 so not sure what pinhead is talking about I only hope someone maybe put the right ones together and cashed .....
@cd329
I hope you played Nesmith and Nembhard and Turner, and Nesmith at least 2 3's
Totally disagree. "Rum has proved his mettle. It's not profit it for him it's volume; and he excels at such. And has he has declared, he "is a pro" and no better
example than last night's post from him "thought Denver would cover, even though I bet OKC".
0
@BankrollReaper
Totally disagree. "Rum has proved his mettle. It's not profit it for him it's volume; and he excels at such. And has he has declared, he "is a pro" and no better
example than last night's post from him "thought Denver would cover, even though I bet OKC".
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.