We are in uncharted territories..Only 1 team out of 4 that have won game one the road won the championship in the last 25 nba finals. 2004 Pistons(which was a special/dominent veteran team IMO). We can not deny both teams playing tonight are special in their own way. However, I still don't believe Indy will just lay down in this game. Carlisle will keep starting lineup in the game down 17 in the starting the 4th. No doubt.
BOL
Pacers Championship +780(5/15)
2
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Indy +11 3x
We are in uncharted territories..Only 1 team out of 4 that have won game one the road won the championship in the last 25 nba finals. 2004 Pistons(which was a special/dominent veteran team IMO). We can not deny both teams playing tonight are special in their own way. However, I still don't believe Indy will just lay down in this game. Carlisle will keep starting lineup in the game down 17 in the starting the 4th. No doubt.
On a 9-1(FG) run so I am due for regression. I have been involved wagering since 2005 and will say that this is a very unusual circumstance and outcome may defy what we all think how this series is going to go. Zig Zag ML maybe but ATS I am still going with the points.
Pacers Championship +780(5/15)
1
On a 9-1(FG) run so I am due for regression. I have been involved wagering since 2005 and will say that this is a very unusual circumstance and outcome may defy what we all think how this series is going to go. Zig Zag ML maybe but ATS I am still going with the points.
@tweets50 good luck i saw post winner is 55-3 ats ........ i agree this is a very unusual deal this pacer team so well balanced seems to me... gonna watch for free ... maybe live but nba treats me bad
goldfinger 1964
1
@tweets50 good luck i saw post winner is 55-3 ats ........ i agree this is a very unusual deal this pacer team so well balanced seems to me... gonna watch for free ... maybe live but nba treats me bad
This is a bad read, the public is all over Indiana and the points. You obviously did not see that angle.
Its ok. more of a feeler bet. We all make bad reads. I was able to get OKC -14.5 and Indy +20.5 at the book so it was all about adjustements for me. This was not a 5x. But you sound very confident. I know many OKC bettors that werent so confident at the book. In my post above I was 100 percent correct. Indy does not give up even the start of the 4th down 17 still had the starting line up there. Could have swung both ways.
But thank you for obviously sheding light on what you saw after the game was over.
Pacers Championship +780(5/15)
0
Quote Originally Posted by bet-lag:
This is a bad read, the public is all over Indiana and the points. You obviously did not see that angle.
Its ok. more of a feeler bet. We all make bad reads. I was able to get OKC -14.5 and Indy +20.5 at the book so it was all about adjustements for me. This was not a 5x. But you sound very confident. I know many OKC bettors that werent so confident at the book. In my post above I was 100 percent correct. Indy does not give up even the start of the 4th down 17 still had the starting line up there. Could have swung both ways.
But thank you for obviously sheding light on what you saw after the game was over.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.