I'm thinking Toronto, Chicago, and Washington. I'm really shitfaced drunk right now and can't wake up in time for these games and need to place the bets before I pass out. Any reason why I shouldn't take these teams?
I'm thinking Toronto, Chicago, and Washington. I'm really shitfaced drunk right now and can't wake up in time for these games and need to place the bets before I pass out. Any reason why I shouldn't take these teams?
Let me add that Chicago is batting .312 vs Lefties for the season. Out of 109 AB vs Maholm, Chicago is.358 avg .408 obp .633 slg 1.041 ops. Wells doesn't have as many AB's but his numbers are better.
On further review, Toronto might not be a good play, as they're batting .198 off Jackson in 96 AB's... I think Chicago is a good play for sure though. Chicago CUBS should be out for blood.
Let me add that Chicago is batting .312 vs Lefties for the season. Out of 109 AB vs Maholm, Chicago is.358 avg .408 obp .633 slg 1.041 ops. Wells doesn't have as many AB's but his numbers are better.
On further review, Toronto might not be a good play, as they're batting .198 off Jackson in 96 AB's... I think Chicago is a good play for sure though. Chicago CUBS should be out for blood.
Being
one of the public darlings of the league, oddsmakers never do Chicago
Cubs backers any favors with their lines because, frankly, they don’t
have to.
Midway through Friday’s 4-2 home matinee loss to the
Pittsburgh Pirates, our esteemed Twitter man @CoversSports tweeted that
Cubs bettors would be down more than $17,000 if they had bet the
loveable losers in every game over the last 10 years.
The
Pirates are a lot better on the road this year and Chicago’s starting
rotation is rotten, Saturday’s starter Randy Wells included. He has
control issues just like Doug Davis.
"I'm not going to make any
excuses for walking six people. That's for sure," Davis said after being
on the hook for all four runs on Friday. "I've been around long enough
to know that walking that many guys against any team is going to come
back to haunt you."
Cubs backers could see more of the same on Saturday,Wells’ first start since he hit the shelf with a forearm issue.
It’s not like we’re crazy about Paul Maholm and his 1-7 record, but the Cubs are overvalued here. Again.
Pick: Pirates
from covers front page. now im confused. will look to it more.
Being
one of the public darlings of the league, oddsmakers never do Chicago
Cubs backers any favors with their lines because, frankly, they don’t
have to.
Midway through Friday’s 4-2 home matinee loss to the
Pittsburgh Pirates, our esteemed Twitter man @CoversSports tweeted that
Cubs bettors would be down more than $17,000 if they had bet the
loveable losers in every game over the last 10 years.
The
Pirates are a lot better on the road this year and Chicago’s starting
rotation is rotten, Saturday’s starter Randy Wells included. He has
control issues just like Doug Davis.
"I'm not going to make any
excuses for walking six people. That's for sure," Davis said after being
on the hook for all four runs on Friday. "I've been around long enough
to know that walking that many guys against any team is going to come
back to haunt you."
Cubs backers could see more of the same on Saturday,Wells’ first start since he hit the shelf with a forearm issue.
It’s not like we’re crazy about Paul Maholm and his 1-7 record, but the Cubs are overvalued here. Again.
Pick: Pirates
from covers front page. now im confused. will look to it more.
Well I locked in the CUBS, NATS, and TORONTO under 8, WIN LOSE OR DRAW I am gonna roll with them. And Covers picking the Pirates doesn't make me feel any worse.
Well I locked in the CUBS, NATS, and TORONTO under 8, WIN LOSE OR DRAW I am gonna roll with them. And Covers picking the Pirates doesn't make me feel any worse.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.