Like Most...Really bought into S.Carolina. Think they easily cover 3td's even if they have big games on deck. Surprised I'm not hearing more about them.. Also on W.Mich, NM, and Miss. St, going to take a flier on W.Kent+19 though keeping it close
Like Most...Really bought into S.Carolina. Think they easily cover 3td's even if they have big games on deck. Surprised I'm not hearing more about them.. Also on W.Mich, NM, and Miss. St, going to take a flier on W.Kent+19 though keeping it close
W. Michigan +13.5 W.Mich returns and experienced QB and skill players. To many pts for an unproven Michigan
S. Carolina -20.5 ECU has absolutely no defense. I think USC covers this if they played Lattimore at QB.
Kentucky -19.5 W. Kentucky's athletes should not be able to match up against any SEC team.
Northwestern +3agree with the pick, dont agree with the reasoning, as i think this will be fairly low scoring, but i just cant imagine BC will have continuity with their workhorse RB montel harris out vs NW. feel like NW will be able to put some drives together and when BC has to rely on the pass, that doesnt bode well. BC shouldn't be able to score with NW
Mississippi St -28 A lot of pts but a major mismatch here.
W. Michigan +13.5 W.Mich returns and experienced QB and skill players. To many pts for an unproven Michigan
S. Carolina -20.5 ECU has absolutely no defense. I think USC covers this if they played Lattimore at QB.
Kentucky -19.5 W. Kentucky's athletes should not be able to match up against any SEC team.
Northwestern +3agree with the pick, dont agree with the reasoning, as i think this will be fairly low scoring, but i just cant imagine BC will have continuity with their workhorse RB montel harris out vs NW. feel like NW will be able to put some drives together and when BC has to rely on the pass, that doesnt bode well. BC shouldn't be able to score with NW
Mississippi St -28 A lot of pts but a major mismatch here.
Clearly I gave KY too much credit.
Thought the talent gap would clearly give them the edge and force WKY to pass.
They should be embarrassed for letting what should be an inferior team dominate
them in the box score. I am writing this with 5min to go in 4th.
Clearly I gave KY too much credit.
Thought the talent gap would clearly give them the edge and force WKY to pass.
They should be embarrassed for letting what should be an inferior team dominate
them in the box score. I am writing this with 5min to go in 4th.
W. Michigan +13.5 W.Mich returns and experienced QB and skill players. To many pts for an unproven Michigan
S. Carolina -20.5 ECU has absolutely no defense. I think USC covers this if they played Lattimore at QB.
Kentucky -19.5 W. Kentucky's athletes should not be able to match up against any SEC team.
Northwestern +3 BC shouldn't be able to score with NW
Mississippi St -28 A lot of pts but a major mismatch here.
Under 53 in TCU/Baylor TCU looks to continue to have a solid defense and I look for them to control the clock with their running game. I like Griffin a lot but I can't back a team that has no D.
W. Michigan +13.5 W.Mich returns and experienced QB and skill players. To many pts for an unproven Michigan
S. Carolina -20.5 ECU has absolutely no defense. I think USC covers this if they played Lattimore at QB.
Kentucky -19.5 W. Kentucky's athletes should not be able to match up against any SEC team.
Northwestern +3 BC shouldn't be able to score with NW
Mississippi St -28 A lot of pts but a major mismatch here.
Under 53 in TCU/Baylor TCU looks to continue to have a solid defense and I look for them to control the clock with their running game. I like Griffin a lot but I can't back a team that has no D.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.