Utah is a popular play and i believe a lot of people have no idea how hard it is to win in the big house. I know our fan base isn't as "loud" as others but were 20-2 at home under Hoke. The perception is that were not good because of the ass whooping we took by ND... Well 2 of our DBs were out, turnovers happened and gholston played heck of a game. The stats doesn't lie, We out gained Notre Dame in total yards.
I've said in a post at the start of the season that our defense has improved and we would be seeing a lot of Unders on Michigan games this year. The rush defense has been stellar so far even though 2 of the 3 opponents are below average teams. Our front 4 hasn't been able to get to the QB much this year but they've been solid up front. Notre Dame manage to only run 54 yards on us? ND exposed our secondary with no Peppers and Taylor...Arguably our best two man coverage DBs.
Nussmeier has been focusing on the run game and I believe well see a lot of conservative play calling this week. We have a young O-Line that's still a work in progress so I expect a lot of runs, bubble screens and swing passes. I'm not sure if Gardner will have a good or bad game as he's been inconsistent for most of his time at UofM. Again, he's been pressured majority of the time because of a young offensive line. Our OC has been trying to make it simple for him with a lot of quick passes and screens. We don't have a speedy "heavy hitter" in the run or pass game.
I won't be backing Michigan in this game but I believe they'lll win the ball game. Bias or not! Ill stick to what I'll know and play the Under 56
Hopefully 28-3.(no fgs bc our kicking game sucks, ha)
Utah is a popular play and i believe a lot of people have no idea how hard it is to win in the big house. I know our fan base isn't as "loud" as others but were 20-2 at home under Hoke. The perception is that were not good because of the ass whooping we took by ND... Well 2 of our DBs were out, turnovers happened and gholston played heck of a game. The stats doesn't lie, We out gained Notre Dame in total yards.
I've said in a post at the start of the season that our defense has improved and we would be seeing a lot of Unders on Michigan games this year. The rush defense has been stellar so far even though 2 of the 3 opponents are below average teams. Our front 4 hasn't been able to get to the QB much this year but they've been solid up front. Notre Dame manage to only run 54 yards on us? ND exposed our secondary with no Peppers and Taylor...Arguably our best two man coverage DBs.
Nussmeier has been focusing on the run game and I believe well see a lot of conservative play calling this week. We have a young O-Line that's still a work in progress so I expect a lot of runs, bubble screens and swing passes. I'm not sure if Gardner will have a good or bad game as he's been inconsistent for most of his time at UofM. Again, he's been pressured majority of the time because of a young offensive line. Our OC has been trying to make it simple for him with a lot of quick passes and screens. We don't have a speedy "heavy hitter" in the run or pass game.
I won't be backing Michigan in this game but I believe they'lll win the ball game. Bias or not! Ill stick to what I'll know and play the Under 56
Hopefully 28-3.(no fgs bc our kicking game sucks, ha)
Utah is a popular play and i believe a lot of people have no idea how hard it is to win in the big house. I know our fan base isn't as "loud" as others but were 20-2 at home under Hoke. The perception is that were not good because of the behind whooping we took by ND... Well 2 of our DBs were out, turnovers happened and gholston played heck of a game. The stats doesn't lie, We out gained Notre Dame in total yards.
I've said in a post at the start of the season that our defense has improved and we would be seeing a lot of Unders on Michigan games this year. The rush defense has been stellar so far even though 2 of the 3 opponents are below average teams. Our front 4 hasn't been able to get to the QB much this year but they've been solid up front. Notre Dame manage to only run 54 yards on us? ND exposed our secondary with no Peppers and Taylor...Arguably our best two man coverage DBs.
Nussmeier has been focusing on the run game and I believe well see a lot of conservative play calling this week. We have a young O-Line that's still a work in progress so I expect a lot of runs, bubble screens and swing passes. I'm not sure if Gardner will have a good or bad game as he's been inconsistent for most of his time at UofM. Again, he's been pressured majority of the time because of a young offensive line. Our OC has been trying to make it simple for him with a lot of quick passes and screens. We don't have a speedy "heavy hitter" in the run or pass game.
I won't be backing Michigan in this game but I believe they'lll win the ball game. Bias or not! Ill stick to what I'll know and play the Under 56
Hopefully 28-3.(no fgs bc our kicking game sucks, ha)
Best of luck.
This comment is ridicolous. Stats don't lie? Let's see, why would Michigan outgain Notre Dame? Maybe because the Irish defense dominated, created 4 turnovers and only had to go 20 yards to score? That was as one-sided a game as you will see. Trying to say it any other way makes me think you know nothing about Michigan football other than picking a picture to use as an avatar. And the reason people perceive you're weak is because of the buffoon that's on the sideline and the fact Michigan hasn't won a Big 10 title in 10 years. Well, make that 11 years. Good luck.
Utah is a popular play and i believe a lot of people have no idea how hard it is to win in the big house. I know our fan base isn't as "loud" as others but were 20-2 at home under Hoke. The perception is that were not good because of the behind whooping we took by ND... Well 2 of our DBs were out, turnovers happened and gholston played heck of a game. The stats doesn't lie, We out gained Notre Dame in total yards.
I've said in a post at the start of the season that our defense has improved and we would be seeing a lot of Unders on Michigan games this year. The rush defense has been stellar so far even though 2 of the 3 opponents are below average teams. Our front 4 hasn't been able to get to the QB much this year but they've been solid up front. Notre Dame manage to only run 54 yards on us? ND exposed our secondary with no Peppers and Taylor...Arguably our best two man coverage DBs.
Nussmeier has been focusing on the run game and I believe well see a lot of conservative play calling this week. We have a young O-Line that's still a work in progress so I expect a lot of runs, bubble screens and swing passes. I'm not sure if Gardner will have a good or bad game as he's been inconsistent for most of his time at UofM. Again, he's been pressured majority of the time because of a young offensive line. Our OC has been trying to make it simple for him with a lot of quick passes and screens. We don't have a speedy "heavy hitter" in the run or pass game.
I won't be backing Michigan in this game but I believe they'lll win the ball game. Bias or not! Ill stick to what I'll know and play the Under 56
Hopefully 28-3.(no fgs bc our kicking game sucks, ha)
Best of luck.
This comment is ridicolous. Stats don't lie? Let's see, why would Michigan outgain Notre Dame? Maybe because the Irish defense dominated, created 4 turnovers and only had to go 20 yards to score? That was as one-sided a game as you will see. Trying to say it any other way makes me think you know nothing about Michigan football other than picking a picture to use as an avatar. And the reason people perceive you're weak is because of the buffoon that's on the sideline and the fact Michigan hasn't won a Big 10 title in 10 years. Well, make that 11 years. Good luck.
This comment is ridicolous. Stats don't lie? Let's see, why would Michigan outgain Notre Dame? Maybe because the Irish defense dominated, created 4 turnovers and only had to go 20 yards to score? That was as one-sided a game as you will see. Trying to say it any other way makes me think you know nothing about Michigan football other than picking a picture to use as an avatar. And the reason people perceive you're weak is because of the buffoon that's on the sideline and the fact Michigan hasn't won a Big 10 title in 10 years. Well, make that 11 years. Good luck.
I know nothing? I clearly stated we took an azzwhooping, you sir are the buffoon. Thanks for the luck though, I'll take it.
Devin Gardner has had 3 different OC at his time in Michigan. He's a good guy but I don't believe he is fit for this system. He is better in a spread and works better when moving around. Sucks to admit it but he simply doesn't have the mental part of the game down. If you watch him, he'll usually just lock his eyes on one receiver and forces his throws.
This comment is ridicolous. Stats don't lie? Let's see, why would Michigan outgain Notre Dame? Maybe because the Irish defense dominated, created 4 turnovers and only had to go 20 yards to score? That was as one-sided a game as you will see. Trying to say it any other way makes me think you know nothing about Michigan football other than picking a picture to use as an avatar. And the reason people perceive you're weak is because of the buffoon that's on the sideline and the fact Michigan hasn't won a Big 10 title in 10 years. Well, make that 11 years. Good luck.
I know nothing? I clearly stated we took an azzwhooping, you sir are the buffoon. Thanks for the luck though, I'll take it.
Devin Gardner has had 3 different OC at his time in Michigan. He's a good guy but I don't believe he is fit for this system. He is better in a spread and works better when moving around. Sucks to admit it but he simply doesn't have the mental part of the game down. If you watch him, he'll usually just lock his eyes on one receiver and forces his throws.
This comment is ridicolous. Stats don't lie? Let's see, why would Michigan outgain Notre Dame? Maybe because the Irish defense dominated, created 4 turnovers and only had to go 20 yards to score? That was as one-sided a game as you will see. Trying to say it any other way makes me think you know nothing about Michigan football other than picking a picture to use as an avatar. And the reason people perceive you're weak is because of the buffoon that's on the sideline and the fact Michigan hasn't won a Big 10 title in 10 years. Well, make that 11 years. Good luck.
your are 100 percent right this coach that U of M is so MF bad its unreal he is good at 1 thing and that is eating
This comment is ridicolous. Stats don't lie? Let's see, why would Michigan outgain Notre Dame? Maybe because the Irish defense dominated, created 4 turnovers and only had to go 20 yards to score? That was as one-sided a game as you will see. Trying to say it any other way makes me think you know nothing about Michigan football other than picking a picture to use as an avatar. And the reason people perceive you're weak is because of the buffoon that's on the sideline and the fact Michigan hasn't won a Big 10 title in 10 years. Well, make that 11 years. Good luck.
your are 100 percent right this coach that U of M is so MF bad its unreal he is good at 1 thing and that is eating
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.