https://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100329/ap_on_bi_ge/us_citigroup_treasury
Kind of like when a gambler is down huge lifetime and loses 3 dimes Saturday and another 2 dimes Sunday and wins the Monday night game and telling people he is kicking ass.
12 billion in profit I feel real bad that they have to pay a billion out of that 12. I actually might lose sleep tonight worrying about it. Why the hell are you so worried about these companies making that kind of obscene money?
12 billion in profit I feel real bad that they have to pay a billion out of that 12. I actually might lose sleep tonight worrying about it. Why the hell are you so worried about these companies making that kind of obscene money?
12 billion in profit I feel real bad that they have to pay a billion out of that 12. I actually might lose sleep tonight worrying about it. Why the hell are you so worried about these companies making that kind of obscene money?
Why don't you donate an extra 10% of your paycheck and see if it bothers you then?
12 billion in profit I feel real bad that they have to pay a billion out of that 12. I actually might lose sleep tonight worrying about it. Why the hell are you so worried about these companies making that kind of obscene money?
Why don't you donate an extra 10% of your paycheck and see if it bothers you then?
Since you want people who attained a pension to forego their pension to help the economy, why don't you forego your dividends?
Since you want people who attained a pension to forego their pension to help the economy, why don't you forego your dividends?
Since you want people who attained a pension to forego their pension to help the economy, why don't you forego your dividends?
Since you want people who attained a pension to forego their pension to help the economy, why don't you forego your dividends?
Since you want people who attained a pension to forego their pension to help the economy, why don't you forego your dividends?
Since you want people who attained a pension to forego their pension to help the economy, why don't you forego your dividends?
Why don't you donate an extra 10% of your paycheck and see if it bothers you then?
Am totally amazed at guys like you who defend these pig corporations making filthy obscene profits like this. Sickening.
I would be glad to take a 10 percent cut if all the corporations take a cut in profits and start actually paying taxes to help the country. These companies all they do is take, they never give back anything. Its time they start paying their fair share in taxes like the rest of us, but then again we got dopes like you who defend these companies. Keep defending them, like they are your best friend and will help you out if you call
Why don't you donate an extra 10% of your paycheck and see if it bothers you then?
Am totally amazed at guys like you who defend these pig corporations making filthy obscene profits like this. Sickening.
I would be glad to take a 10 percent cut if all the corporations take a cut in profits and start actually paying taxes to help the country. These companies all they do is take, they never give back anything. Its time they start paying their fair share in taxes like the rest of us, but then again we got dopes like you who defend these companies. Keep defending them, like they are your best friend and will help you out if you call
Even though the charges are "noncash," AT&T and other companies that were currently able to deduct the subsidy will have to pay higher tax bills.
-------
AT&T will make their decision to:
-end the benefits
-pay higher taxes
-raise prices
-lay people off to make up for the higher taxes they need to pay
they wont choose B. if they choose C, they will lose customers to verizon and sprint
dj and cd - choose...A or D
Even though the charges are "noncash," AT&T and other companies that were currently able to deduct the subsidy will have to pay higher tax bills.
-------
AT&T will make their decision to:
-end the benefits
-pay higher taxes
-raise prices
-lay people off to make up for the higher taxes they need to pay
they wont choose B. if they choose C, they will lose customers to verizon and sprint
dj and cd - choose...A or D
Why shouldn't it be directed towards shareholders? Are you not investing your money in a company in the same way that a government employee invests their time, both the expectation of payouts based on that "investment."
Why shouldn't it be directed towards shareholders? Are you not investing your money in a company in the same way that a government employee invests their time, both the expectation of payouts based on that "investment."
Am totally amazed at guys like you who defend these pig corporations making filthy obscene profits like this. Sickening.
I would be glad to take a 10 percent cut if all the corporations take a cut in profits and start actually paying taxes to help the country. These companies all they do is take, they never give back anything. Its time they start paying their fair share in taxes like the rest of us, but then again we got dopes like you who defend these companies. Keep defending them, like they are your best friend and will help you out if you call
Am totally amazed at guys like you who defend these pig corporations making filthy obscene profits like this. Sickening.
I would be glad to take a 10 percent cut if all the corporations take a cut in profits and start actually paying taxes to help the country. These companies all they do is take, they never give back anything. Its time they start paying their fair share in taxes like the rest of us, but then again we got dopes like you who defend these companies. Keep defending them, like they are your best friend and will help you out if you call
Even though the charges are "noncash," AT&T and other companies that were currently able to deduct the subsidy will have to pay higher tax bills.
-------
AT&T will make their decision to:
-end the benefits
-pay higher taxes
-raise prices
-lay people off to make up for the higher taxes they need to pay
they wont choose B. if they choose C, they will lose customers to verizon and sprint
dj and cd - choose...A or D
Priceless.
ATT's profit was119.3 Billion. Now they will have to pay out less than 1 cent on every dollar to make sure that they can pay their employees as promised. But you have selfish pieces of garbage that demand higher dividends, then blame the government when the company needs to account for that 1 penny for every dollar profit.
I thought you loved this country, KOAJ. Couldn't you take 1 penny less for every dollar of dividends?
Not to worry. I am sure some of your lemmings will be along shortly to defend you.
Even though the charges are "noncash," AT&T and other companies that were currently able to deduct the subsidy will have to pay higher tax bills.
-------
AT&T will make their decision to:
-end the benefits
-pay higher taxes
-raise prices
-lay people off to make up for the higher taxes they need to pay
they wont choose B. if they choose C, they will lose customers to verizon and sprint
dj and cd - choose...A or D
Priceless.
ATT's profit was119.3 Billion. Now they will have to pay out less than 1 cent on every dollar to make sure that they can pay their employees as promised. But you have selfish pieces of garbage that demand higher dividends, then blame the government when the company needs to account for that 1 penny for every dollar profit.
I thought you loved this country, KOAJ. Couldn't you take 1 penny less for every dollar of dividends?
Not to worry. I am sure some of your lemmings will be along shortly to defend you.
Why shouldn't it be directed towards shareholders? Are you not investing your money in a company in the same way that a government employee invests their time, both the expectation of payouts based on that "investment."
Why shouldn't it be directed towards shareholders? Are you not investing your money in a company in the same way that a government employee invests their time, both the expectation of payouts based on that "investment."
I'm taking about the employee. It doesn't matter if it is public or private in terms of the expectations. I'll ask again:
Why shouldn't it be directed towards shareholders? Are you not investing your money in a company in the same way that a government employee invests their time, both the expectation of payouts based on that "investment."
I'm taking about the employee. It doesn't matter if it is public or private in terms of the expectations. I'll ask again:
Why shouldn't it be directed towards shareholders? Are you not investing your money in a company in the same way that a government employee invests their time, both the expectation of payouts based on that "investment."
Priceless.
ATT's profit was119.3 Billion. Now they will have to pay out less than 1 cent on every dollar to make sure that they can pay their employees as promised. But you have selfish pieces of garbage that demand higher dividends, then blame the government when the company needs to account for that 1 penny for every dollar profit.
I thought you loved this country, KOAJ. Couldn't you take 1 penny less for every dollar of dividends?
Not to worry. I am sure some of your lemmings will be along shortly to defend you.
Priceless.
ATT's profit was119.3 Billion. Now they will have to pay out less than 1 cent on every dollar to make sure that they can pay their employees as promised. But you have selfish pieces of garbage that demand higher dividends, then blame the government when the company needs to account for that 1 penny for every dollar profit.
I thought you loved this country, KOAJ. Couldn't you take 1 penny less for every dollar of dividends?
Not to worry. I am sure some of your lemmings will be along shortly to defend you.
And look at the payout ratios. Look at the return on investments. Once again, to suggest that they only solution is to cut back on employees plans is a joke.
And look at the payout ratios. Look at the return on investments. Once again, to suggest that they only solution is to cut back on employees plans is a joke.
I'm taking about the employee. It doesn't matter if it is public or private in terms of the expectations. I'll ask again:
Why shouldn't it be directed towards shareholders? Are you not investing your money in a company in the same way that a government employee invests their time, both the expectation of payouts based on that "investment."
I'm taking about the employee. It doesn't matter if it is public or private in terms of the expectations. I'll ask again:
Why shouldn't it be directed towards shareholders? Are you not investing your money in a company in the same way that a government employee invests their time, both the expectation of payouts based on that "investment."
And look at the payout ratios. Look at the return on investments. Once again, to suggest that they only solution is to cut back on employees plans is a joke.
And look at the payout ratios. Look at the return on investments. Once again, to suggest that they only solution is to cut back on employees plans is a joke.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.