Personally, I am not playing the Phi/Chi Over because my personal plays are on the Under...so it's a no-play for me...I will count it on the system record to keep it accurate...
Personally, I am not playing the Phi/Chi Over because my personal plays are on the Under...so it's a no-play for me...I will count it on the system record to keep it accurate...
Ok don't take this the wrong way and I'm not attacking you or your system but I'd like to ask what good is a system if it doesn't work everyday? As I spot bet regularly I understand NO-PLAY's but a SYSTEM is determined by a bunch of parameters that should be able to work every game every day..no?
Ok don't take this the wrong way and I'm not attacking you or your system but I'd like to ask what good is a system if it doesn't work everyday? As I spot bet regularly I understand NO-PLAY's but a SYSTEM is determined by a bunch of parameters that should be able to work every game every day..no?
Actually no I disagree...handicappers need to be selective in their capping...need to pick and choose and try to develop ways to catch the oddsmakers when they make a mistake...they don't make mistakes on every game, so if you had a system that had a play every game you would be losing mad money to juice...
Good systems have selections that generally go against the public at the right time and need to be selective just like good handicappers need to posess the same qualities.
Thanks for the comment...hope what I said is clear and to the point!
Actually no I disagree...handicappers need to be selective in their capping...need to pick and choose and try to develop ways to catch the oddsmakers when they make a mistake...they don't make mistakes on every game, so if you had a system that had a play every game you would be losing mad money to juice...
Good systems have selections that generally go against the public at the right time and need to be selective just like good handicappers need to posess the same qualities.
Thanks for the comment...hope what I said is clear and to the point!
Ok don't take this the wrong way and I'm not attacking you or your system but I'd like to ask what good is a system if it doesn't work everyday? As I spot bet regularly I understand NO-PLAY's but a SYSTEM is determined by a bunch of parameters that should be able to work every game every day..no?
The only thing that matters is if you are up money. Who cares if you don't play games every day, if the system makes you $$$$ are you going to toss it out the window simply because it didnt allow you to make bets every single day?
Ok don't take this the wrong way and I'm not attacking you or your system but I'd like to ask what good is a system if it doesn't work everyday? As I spot bet regularly I understand NO-PLAY's but a SYSTEM is determined by a bunch of parameters that should be able to work every game every day..no?
The only thing that matters is if you are up money. Who cares if you don't play games every day, if the system makes you $$$$ are you going to toss it out the window simply because it didnt allow you to make bets every single day?
A team covers two games in a row (against the same team) the team that has covered is playing well, maybe over exceeding...while just the opposite for the other team. Meanwhile the public is already thinking sweep...this team is hot there is no stopping them now...so the public is all over the team on the winning streak, hence line get's inflated, meanwhile the team that has lost two in a row is most likely going to play better and many times the team in the streak is due for a letdown.
The over/under system...same principle, the public sees two overs or unders in a row and they are all over it, again line gets inflated. But, these are professional teams...if scoring is down it's likely because either one of the teams (or both) haven't been shooting well and that has a way of averaging out. Also, when games are going over teams will focus more on defense again favoring the under. Everything I just pointed out about two overs in a row is true about two unders in a row also...but just the opposite, with the public zeroing in on unders while the teams are focussing on generating more offense.
Both systems are naturally based to go against the public and with the flow of the series.
A team covers two games in a row (against the same team) the team that has covered is playing well, maybe over exceeding...while just the opposite for the other team. Meanwhile the public is already thinking sweep...this team is hot there is no stopping them now...so the public is all over the team on the winning streak, hence line get's inflated, meanwhile the team that has lost two in a row is most likely going to play better and many times the team in the streak is due for a letdown.
The over/under system...same principle, the public sees two overs or unders in a row and they are all over it, again line gets inflated. But, these are professional teams...if scoring is down it's likely because either one of the teams (or both) haven't been shooting well and that has a way of averaging out. Also, when games are going over teams will focus more on defense again favoring the under. Everything I just pointed out about two overs in a row is true about two unders in a row also...but just the opposite, with the public zeroing in on unders while the teams are focussing on generating more offense.
Both systems are naturally based to go against the public and with the flow of the series.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.