US PRESSWIRE

NFL Underdogs: Week 9 pointspread picks

Next time someone tells you trap lines don’t exist in pro football betting, tell that jackass you know better.

I used to be that loudmouth know-it-all. The only association I made with entrapment was Catherine Zeta-Jones in tights.



I would tell anyone who listened that there was no such thing as a fishy line or a spread where the books were begging you to bet one side. Bookmakers, in my mind, just wanted two-way action and were happy to live off the juice.

Trap lines to me were as real as Big Foot or a British person with good teeth.

But my world was rocked earlier this fall when oddsmaker Bob Scucci told listeners on Chad Millman’s podcast that he does set lines sometimes knowing he’s going to get more money on one side than the other.

As with any UFO sighting, you’ve got to go straight to the source, so I called Scucci to give him a chance to back pedal on all this trap line foolishness.

“We’ve got opinions on games and we’ll take a stand on some of them,” the Coast Casinos director of race and sports told me. “That’s how we make our money.”

I thought Scucci was pulling a Palin and going maverick, but other Vegas oddsmakers told me the same thing.

“Ninety percent of the time it’s not two-way action,” Hilton Las Vegas sportsbook manager Jay Kornegay said with little prying on my part. “We’ve got to make decisions on those games.”

By decisions, Kornegay means whether to move the line or stay put. He has to decide whether he feels like his book is on the right side of an unbalanced handle. In other words, does he think his book will win the game or will the bettors take him to the cleaners?
 
“Anytime you’ve got a good team on the road as a short favorite,” Scucci said. “We know the public will see it as an opportunity to get the better teams at a cheaper price and we see the home side as live dogs.”

There are two, clear cases of entrapment on this week’s NFL betting board: Packers (-5.5) at San Diego and Niners (-4) at Washington. It’s clear the bookies are welcoming action on San Fran and Green Bay.

“Looks like we’ll be rooting for San Diego on Sunday,” Bert Osborne, sportsbook boss at South Point said.

I asked him if he knew he’d be rooting for the Chargers as soon as he opened Packers -5.5 and all he said was, “Yup”.



Easy there Admiral Ackbar. Just because oddsmakers like Osborne, Kornegay and Scucci all like the home underdogs in these two cases doesn’t mean we should back away from our first lean.

I already bet the chalk in both of those matchups and I’d be lying if I said this was an easy week to pick three underdog plays. Let’s proceed and try to avoid any more ambushes.

New York Giants (+9) at New England Patriots


The Pats have all kinds of motivation coming off a loss and playing against the Giants for the first time since Super Bowl XLII. Big Blue could be missing some big names on both sides of the line (WR Hakeem Nicks, RB Ahmad Bradshaw and DE Jason Pierre-Paul), but Coughlin’s crew loves playing on the road.

The G-Men are 29-13 ATS in their last 42 road games and 13-6 ATS in their last nine games as road underdogs.

Bill Belichick is brilliant but brains can’t fix the Pats' leaky secondary.

Pick: Giants +9

Cincinnati Bengals (+3) at Tennessee Titans

Maybe that was a trap season win total Vegas sportsbooks posted on the Bengals. Remember how bettors were mocking bookmakers for opening Cincinnati’s win total at 7.5 and 8 at some shops? Well it looks like the bad guys will get the last laugh on that one.

The Bengals are 6-1 against the spread and only two wins away from pushing on that 8-win total. Some people think this team is overrated and has just capitalized on a soft schedule (Cincy still hasn’t played Baltimore or Pittsburgh).

But there’s no denying Cincy’s defense is legit and Tennessee has just 23 offensive plays of 20 yards or more gained.

Pick: Bengals +3

St. Louis Rams (+2.5) at Arizona Cardinals

We can call this one the degenerate special because only bettors will be watching this game. I like the Rams in this one because I don’t think anyone on Arizona’s offensive line can block Rams DE Chris Long.

Pick: Rams +2.5

Last week: 2-1
Season record: 14-10-1


--

Want another way to bash Ashton’s picks? Follow him on Twitter @AshtonGrewal.

If you have any feedback or suggestions for our Editorial Team, please contact us at Editorial

            share   SHARE   rss   RSS FEED   email   EMAIL   print   PRINT
Hide All Responses
avatar

Posted by TommyToronto
1 year ago

I also emailed Covers about the inappropriate and disgusting comments found in the Ice Picks thread. And the usual suspects are back today - is Covers going to do anything about this or is losing regulars not a concern? I really hope that you can take this seriously and that action is taken soon.
avatar

Posted by YukonTrav
1 year ago

Good article Ashton... say, i have a bone to pick with you - i emailed Covers editors last week about IcePicks getting deluged by Pierre, Luckster, Duhu and Lucky LogansAss with tons of "fuck you fuck you faggot" emails. And several of these, with pedophile comments: "Posted by LuckyLogansAss 1 hour ago hello frenchyassclown. did you have fun fishing at the kiddy park today? you watching some kiddy porn of your own kids with the neighbours? i thought so..go back masturbating in front of your kids psycho!! and make your kids cum in your mouth like they you usually do... have fun at the cop shop FRENHCYASSCLOWN. .....i guess FRENCHYASSCLOWN is also hiding behind another alis..FRENCHYASSCLOWN is too scared to say really who he is,that is what we call a HYPOCRITE CHILD MOLESTER ....*** Cum in a kid's mouth? WTF are you Covers people doing to address this shit? No moderator? Very disappointed, as a dozen guys wrote emails to the Editors and nothing was done? Im checking out of Covers if you guys cant protect us from this filth ... all due respect, YukonTrav
avatar

Posted by larryv123
1 year ago

totally agree with the article. but got to back my pats all the way. open for friends requests.
avatar

Posted by Parlayed
1 year ago

I have always refered to them as baited lines. But of course there the same animal. Not sure on the picks , but what I am sure of is refering to the St. Lou - Arizona game as the degenerate special is funny as hell, because it's spot on. As far as the Bolts are concerned, I must like like them too because I took 'em on the money line. It gets loud down in SoCal, The GB defense is average at best, and Rivers can snap out of his funk at a moments notice.
avatar

Posted by zoocorp
1 year ago

Ashton, technically I think those are called yoga pants :):)
avatar

Posted by Ashton_Grewal
1 year ago

I love them on CZJ... whatever they're called.
avatar

Posted by Ashton_Grewal
1 year ago

Thanks for reading guys. I understand the hesitation backing the Giants. Big revenge spot for the Pats. Good luck today with your plays fellas!
avatar

Posted by whitesnake1983
1 year ago

I agree with the last 2, but I don't think that the Patriots will let the Giants off the hook so easy, I think that they will kill them so badly, that Eli & co will be ashamed to return to NY. If you want another underdog, try Chicago on +7.5 on Monday.
avatar

Posted by CSFurious
1 year ago

great points in the article believe in AJ Feeley i would tease these games together to +10 each easy money
avatar

Posted by wizardofroz
1 year ago

Traps are most evident when betting UTEP games, as Miners have a hazardous job.
avatar

Posted by crazygambler
1 year ago

Take NEW England,Tennesee,Arizona.
avatar

Posted by TommyToronto
1 year ago

It's odd that EVERY site I've gone to, EVERY article I've read, EVERY preview show I've watched has taken the Rams. So, two SHITTY teams are facing off and EVERYONE is on the shitty road team?!? Yeah, big home win last week against a Saints team that did not even show up. But I can't understand the 100% support for them. I'd say it's a more like a 50-50 coin flip. And my feeling is that ARIZ gets its 2nd win of the season. We'll see which way the coin lands...
avatar

Posted by monkeythug
1 year ago

You obviously didn't look too deep because the expert on the next page over picked Arizone, hahahaha: http://experts.covers.com/handicapper.aspx?ce=20298
avatar

Posted by wackycracker
1 year ago

I agree withyou on the rams and bengals--taking them in a small par--but I'm staying on the plantation with my Patriot masters.I just can't run into the G-Mens welcoming arms just yet--good article.....
         1      
You are currently not logged in.
Login | Signup | Help
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Top Response

Posted by CSFurious
1 year ago

"great points in the article believe in AJ Feeley i would tease these games together to +10 each easy money"