Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nice card, I appreciate the write ups. BOL
|
FergsFavs123 | 35 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Best of luck but I'm on the other side of this. Pitts D secondary looked vulnerable last week and stats looked better since McSorely didn't connect. Okla should move the ball handily
|
saigonbynight | 16 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Michigan will third, again, in the BigTen east.
Disappointing top ten list but hats off for putting it out there.
|
Tappy | 25 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
you are on a good run with totals, BOL this week
|
LockedUp247 | 169 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Great write ups, thank you for taking the time to share them on the board
|
suuma | 260 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GL this season, I like the write ups
|
phixer | 433 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
replied to
NCAA WEEK 2 **** Go ahead and set your watch to 8:54 and remove the battery ****
in College Football
I posted this in another thread but see that you like the PSU play. I hope you are right and I'm just stung by the loss last week. GL
repost: I'm a huge Penn State fan and follow the team closely. I hope that you are right and PSU bounces back this week, but I'm not touching this game.
The O line struggled beyond belief last week. Missed assignments, a green horn at L tackle and they couldn't identify blitz's. Hence the 10 sacks. Like last year when the O line faltered, Hackenburg started looking at the rush and not downfield, which compounded the sacks. On D, PSU lost the starting MLB for the season and have another LB injured, I'm not sure if he's playing this week. PSU LB roster is thin and we will likely see a good bit of a true freshman at LB. With the MLB loss last week, communication became a major issue. Hopefully they resolved that this week. Temple is a good team, with lots of returning starters, Buffalo can't say the same. But you can bet they will be bringing the house blitzing, just like Temple. I'm not confident enough that the O line figured it out this week. The D will be a work in progress with the LB situation and its 70-100% chance of rain today. All this combined I just don't think the game is a good risk for the money. |
TRAIN69 | 98 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I'm a huge Penn State fan and follow the team closely. I hope that you are right and PSU bounces back this week, but I'm not touching this game.
The O line struggled beyond belief last week. Missed assignments, a green horn at L tackle and they couldn't identify blitz's. Hence the 10 sacks. Like last year when the O line faltered, Hackenburg started looking at the rush and not downfield, which compounded the sacks. On D, PSU lost the starting MLB for the season and have another LB injured, I'm not sure if he's playing this week. PSU LB roster is thin and we will likely see a good bit of a true freshman at LB. With the MLB loss last week, communication became a major issue. Hopefully they resolved that this week. Temple is a good team, with lots of returning starters, Buffalo can't say the same. But you can bet they will be bringing the house blitzing, just like Temple. I'm not confident enough that the O line figured it out this week. The D will be a work in progress with the LB situation and its 70-100% chance of rain today. All this combined I just don't think the game is a good risk for the money.
|
Liquid_gold | 17 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
my cut and paste didn't work too well
Penn State -7 bought the hook Illinios -7 first half Illinois -13.5 Texas AM -2 Stanford -10
|
danmcc | 2 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
danmcc | 2 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NDSU -14 1/2
|
WISEGUY36 | 90 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Best of luck
|
gatornation | 28 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
replied to
NCAA-F | Sep 13, 2014 Indiana vs. Bowling Green Indiana -8-110 at BMAKER
in College Football
Good write ups, thank you
|
zelo123 | 51 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I love the UCF play. Game one they started DiNovo at QB who didn't play well the first half. Holman came in the second half and almost won the game vs PSU.
Todays depth chart shows Holman starting so I anticipate a close game if not an outright win for UCF.
|
theginchy | 4 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
good start to the week, congrats
|
pappadoc | 20 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Good luck
|
Solo87 | 13 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Good call, didn't see that coming. Great game.
|
HOFCity | 19 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quote Originally Posted by HOFCity: This forum, Jesus Christ, still infected I see, where have all the cowboys gone? 1 play today: Michigan +15 or +16 or if you're lucky enough to get +17. You're going to win with any of those numbers. You lay the points with the Bucks, you deserve what you get after. BOL to all my friends of this forum. GL to you, I watch a lot of big ten football and I just don't believe UM has it this year against a strong OSU team. Rivalry or not UM just doesn't have the horsepower this year to keep this game close. UM's November point production 6 vs MSU, 13 vs Nebraska whose D is down this year and 21 vs Iowa, all three games are losses. OSU D is better than NU or Iowa, UM 2 td's at best imo UM's d hasn't really locked down anyone this year with OSU's offense racking up some points. OSU 35 points plus some run up in score if Urb's is trying to get into the number 2 spot by running up the score.
|
HOFCity | 19 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Great stuff, thanks for posting
|
Wayne317 | 402 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
good week of picks, congrats
|
holydiver | 17 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.