Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by Nitro:
Harvard is going to remind Cornell today why they're at the bottom.
thats a perfect quote!!! |
Covers | 8 |
|
|
Ark -7.,5 ecar needed lots of luck in their last game against terrible houston defense... i watched every play (with tivo replays)... rain, pickoffs, lucky breaks & they still barely won that game... like 90% all underdogs this bowl season so far?, time for the Favs... GL |
Covers | 54 |
|
|
ok visiting friend in vegas this week & sportsbook in major hotel only offering PL on this game!!??? -110 either way.... hmm sure, ok... edmon +1.5 haha, "just pay the F'n bill and move on!" lol GL
|
Covers | 6 |
|
|
line dropped a little...hmm
|
Covers | 6 |
|
|
Edmonton +265 they played about half their 82 game season and maybe the new year/first game of the 2010 decade will generate a possible spark TODAY???...haha, that & combined with the bad press this morning with about the reastuarant bill fiasco... https://www.edmontonsun.com/sports/myoilers/2010/01/01/12321546.html its risy sure but i just feel this might cause a default-spark to try to defend themselves from abuse (an unexpected win today just to divert any bad-will attentions from dinner fiasco). what better way to minimize a bad situation .lol... i also liked the Edm players comments: "we are the edmonton oilers! we expect a 50% discount!"... umm ok maybe win some games first!!!?...lol could be a juicy spot today fueled by crazy actions & crazy statements? maybe should take the +PL? but its a new decade, anything is possible!!! hehe GL
|
Covers | 6 |
|
|
AZ -3.5 (locked it in last night) weather up here in NorCal is unseasonably warm also GLall |
Covers | 92 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by a1b2c3d4e5f6:
At this price Kings +150 is the only play to make well said... Kings |
Covers | 4 |
|
|
got the under at 5.5 last night before it dropped down to 5... just hoping the line movement actually means something here.hehe Mon playing much better as of late, but Buff is tough in the net... does Montreal go back to their "stick figure" ways? & put up only 1? GLall |
Covers | 4 |
|
|
OMG...77yd game winning drive, wow... more crazy shhhit... c'mon man? massive INSANE upsets today but makes for great NFL coverage & competativeness... |
Covers | 29 |
|
|
"daa RRRaaiiderrzzzz" (said like a pissedoff boomer) what a freaky retarded week 13!!! (sighs) at least Pitt punched it in for the SU win? 1:55 left, what raiderz gunna drive the field for the win? wtf... "c'mon man!?!" |
Covers | 29 |
|
|
wholey shit this game really is insane!!!...wtf?... where is the saints D?... but don't worry saints backers, the zornyskins will find additional ways to give this game away. haha this is exactly why i hate this debacle redskins team! wow, retarded crazy game, no wonder its on tv!!!... |
Covers | 86 |
|
|
*also meant saints over 57 last week, not 52... oopsie, early morning post...lol
|
Covers | 86 |
|
|
Lets go Pitt !!!
|
Covers | 29 |
|
|
i meant *possible cover?
|
Covers | 86 |
|
|
Just want to add some personal thoughts on this game... i'm not a sainters hater nor a bandwagon jumper = i picked saints to go to the bowl ever since i seen that preseason 40 pointer... even though that was only preseason against the raiders i believe? i still seen it gelling together for brees/saints... with that said; i do believe the crappy skins which i absolutely hate- do cover here... only because of a few personal opinion/debatable/highly speculative reasons: 1- this would be the greatest thing for the skins organization to take down the almighty saints, especially after such a high profile win on MNF against americas team (no not the cowboys, the pats) 2- the saints really do not want to expose EVERY play/gameplan they have, just so other teams can't watch "more" tape on them & study for upcoming playoffs = they have to save a little for upcoming matchups; thus i think saints bring their "B" package gameplan here- which could easily still torch the skins. (ex: more standard run game, less all outness down the field... saints just looking for a decent win & no injuries going into final stretch) 3- "ANY GIVEN SUNDAY" scenerio. (remember i'm just talking possible cover, not so much SU win) 4- the skins do have a semi-semi decent defense (@ home) & can cause some possible incompletes or ints (which brees is capable of) 5- road/outside/cold/grass game 6- as much as i hate campbell QB, he "can" complete 13yd passes for 1st downs "IF" he is given pass protection (proved that last week vs eagles... which i got burned on eagles parlay last week ;) hehe 7- all it takes is a couple of fluke kickoff runbacks or pass int-flags for a backdoor cover, which happens all the time (getting 9.5) 8- game switched to national tv in last 2 days (ratings- usually means close and/OR exciting game = thus very possible spread cover) 9- blowouts on nat tv are bad for the NFL & networks (as a whole). Rich Eisen alluded to 3 times in past 4 weeks - that the NFL does not "understand" what a dog or favorite is!lol... (most definitely instructed by the comissioner, which can only imply that the new commisioners mindset is to create more evenly viewed matchups, which means better competativeness (either by flag or other)... thats just my take on the comments -and my friend also thought same thing when we heard them... again its speculative but worth mentioning, considering how many dog-upsets we see nowadays?haha 10- one or two very possible turnovers in redzone can equal a cover (also remember the steelers put up over 500 yds offense/ double the TOP/double the first downs AND lost the game outright vs KC, nevermind cover the 10!!!)... stuff like that does happen to dd favs when u least expect it... 500 yds offense & only 24 points & lost to kc...lmfao *bonus 11- this is easily the redskins superbowl and "could" get the skins pumped up at home.... hahaha, true, the skins still could easily get torched with brees on bench...lol BUT what i like about this matchup is the UNDER!... i refuse to let myself take the skins under any circumstances, but i do think the under is a viable play... i'm mean just stop & think for a second = if the saints game didn't go over 52 last MNF AT HOME ON TURF with all the hype, going up against a well anticipated Patriots team, the there is a value-chance on this cold-outdoor game @ redskins, on grass, with the mono-dimensional redskins gameplans (tic tic tic)... i'm just sayin that when you have a skins team that rarely goes deep & would rather keep saints offense off the field as much as possible (skins coaching assumption), then you do have a recipe for a tic tic tic under 48... sure, could easily be a saints route even with a redzone turnover, but i'm just saying- last week at home everything worked in saints favor, on turf, & game could have stayed around the 50 mark as it did... just sayin... (& lets not forget kicker carney, who could EASILY miss another fg in this game - outdoors)... he was shakey on ex points also, so i won't rule out another missed saints fg here... not any expert, just my thoughts on the possible UNDER and/or cover... just trying to breakdown this matchup without the usual stat-filled #s, and more of a Reality angle... i'm not a self-proclaimed expert, but not a newcommer to the NFL... just food for thought anyway, enjoy it or just scroll pass it, but either way just remember this: sports with odds/spreads ARE Fickle sometimes, and the spreads almost always employ sick-reverse-psychology...hehe ;) but i'm still taking the under 48...haha GLall & lets go Pitt-AZ-Manning!!! |
Covers | 86 |
|
|
ok so much for that... its all backwards!? haha ok... columbus losing at home against toronto?? wow...thought columbus was playing hard lately? wtf K time for me to layoff Toronto/montreal/columbus for a while... i need to start playing the good teams lol!!!
|
Covers | 6 |
|
|
Bills +3.5 hoping the hook helps? & Chezman, just saw on NFLch, that the roof will stay closed... they say temp outside will get down to 2 degrees celcius... is that like 30 degrees Fahrenheit??? |
Covers | 97 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DHoff11:
Anyone have inside information on what uniforms the ducks will be wearing tonight? yeah i'd like to know also???... although i do like those ducks "manhole cover" uniforms!lol OR state+9 & the under 63... (14+ days off for both teams, hopefully a slow out of syc start, for the under)...
|
Covers | 103 |
|
|
-Buffalo under (montreal sucks) -Columbus puckline (toronto sucks, but a lil scared of the usual shootout puckline fix) small revenge parlay, against montreal & toronto for destroying me the other night... hope tor & mon go back to being lifeless teams again! |
Covers | 6 |
|
|
sooo, what columbus plays a great game yesterday against a scrappy STL defense, then now they come out flat? right? hmmm... i could see a columbus upset here? (with fantastic +200 value)... gunna take a $100x3 leg parlay potshot-hunch with columbus & montreal & under... hehe (Toronto was absolutely lifeless last night. at home)... col +200, mon -135, mon under
GLall
|
Covers | 9 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.