Take the NYY at -110. Until Nova proves otherwise, when he has been on the mound, the Yankees usually win. This line is low, which is a great thing. Without looking at numbers, I believe that he typically gets the most run support out of all the Yanks pitchers. Delgado has mediocre results this year. I would honestly recommend putting a few units on this one. Please feel free to check out my other recent posts for interleague. Been on fire recently and hitting mostly every parlay i've put forth. Got another one today. Woke up late, so was able to put up TEX RL, LAD ML, and ARI ML. Took that down pretty easily. For the most part, my top picks have been winning probably close overall to 80% this week.
Take the NYY at -110. Until Nova proves otherwise, when he has been on the mound, the Yankees usually win. This line is low, which is a great thing. Without looking at numbers, I believe that he typically gets the most run support out of all the Yanks pitchers. Delgado has mediocre results this year. I would honestly recommend putting a few units on this one. Please feel free to check out my other recent posts for interleague. Been on fire recently and hitting mostly every parlay i've put forth. Got another one today. Woke up late, so was able to put up TEX RL, LAD ML, and ARI ML. Took that down pretty easily. For the most part, my top picks have been winning probably close overall to 80% this week.
Can't mention it enough but if Oak beat Ari when Parker and Cahill were on the mound, would have made an additional 2000 dollars on 60 dollars worth of parlays. Wrecked my 9 game parlay causing me to hit 8 out of 9
Can't mention it enough but if Oak beat Ari when Parker and Cahill were on the mound, would have made an additional 2000 dollars on 60 dollars worth of parlays. Wrecked my 9 game parlay causing me to hit 8 out of 9
I agree. I know his ERA is nothing to write home about, however, his record speaks for itself. For some reason when he is behind the mound, the Yankees bats are on fire. I really don't see Delgado as a th
I agree. I know his ERA is nothing to write home about, however, his record speaks for itself. For some reason when he is behind the mound, the Yankees bats are on fire. I really don't see Delgado as a th
Same thing happened to me with OAK on Sat night. 3 big parlays lost. I also like and played the NYY tomorrow. Also LAA and Over as well. NYY should win a 7-3, 6-3 game
Same thing happened to me with OAK on Sat night. 3 big parlays lost. I also like and played the NYY tomorrow. Also LAA and Over as well. NYY should win a 7-3, 6-3 game
Thank you. I understand your concern, however, their volume of hits and hrs makes up for that. All I can offer you is what I know and attempt to provide an analysis of what will most likely happen. This month, the least amount of runs that the Yankees have put up was 3, and that was twice. This month they are averaging 5.44 runs per contest. That should be sufficient enough to make this a positive ev wager, especially with that favorable line. My second favorite wager tomorrow would either be the over in this game or LAA with a line of -101. The Angels have been very impressive as of late and even though the Dodgers are a good club, I don't believe that they will be able to keep up with the Angels offense tomorrow. I believe that Capuano has been pitching a bit over his head this year so far, and in the end, his stats will regress more towards the norm. The Angels are a team that could help contribute with that. Garrett Richards has been very good in his minor league career and was very impressive with his first start this year. I believe this game will come down to if the Dodgers can match the Angels run for run. My answer to that is probably not without Kemp. especially given they have been averaging 6.22 runs per game this month compared to the Dodgers at 4.7 with 10 days straight of no rest.
Thank you. I understand your concern, however, their volume of hits and hrs makes up for that. All I can offer you is what I know and attempt to provide an analysis of what will most likely happen. This month, the least amount of runs that the Yankees have put up was 3, and that was twice. This month they are averaging 5.44 runs per contest. That should be sufficient enough to make this a positive ev wager, especially with that favorable line. My second favorite wager tomorrow would either be the over in this game or LAA with a line of -101. The Angels have been very impressive as of late and even though the Dodgers are a good club, I don't believe that they will be able to keep up with the Angels offense tomorrow. I believe that Capuano has been pitching a bit over his head this year so far, and in the end, his stats will regress more towards the norm. The Angels are a team that could help contribute with that. Garrett Richards has been very good in his minor league career and was very impressive with his first start this year. I believe this game will come down to if the Dodgers can match the Angels run for run. My answer to that is probably not without Kemp. especially given they have been averaging 6.22 runs per game this month compared to the Dodgers at 4.7 with 10 days straight of no rest.
Wanted to add that the Braves have averaged 4.63 runs per game this month, however, that was largely scewed due to putting up 11 runs and 8 runs in two of this month's contests. Take those 2 games out and they are only averaging 3 runs a game. With inconsistent hitting like that, it will be tough to keep up with a hot Yankees team.
Wanted to add that the Braves have averaged 4.63 runs per game this month, however, that was largely scewed due to putting up 11 runs and 8 runs in two of this month's contests. Take those 2 games out and they are only averaging 3 runs a game. With inconsistent hitting like that, it will be tough to keep up with a hot Yankees team.
OK... so i have a ridiculous looking card today. 2 straight bets, 4 two game parlays, 3 three game parlays, 1 four game parlay, 1 five game parlay, 2 seven game parlays, and 1 eight game parlay for a total of $539.10 at risk. This is going to get interesting...
OK... so i have a ridiculous looking card today. 2 straight bets, 4 two game parlays, 3 three game parlays, 1 four game parlay, 1 five game parlay, 2 seven game parlays, and 1 eight game parlay for a total of $539.10 at risk. This is going to get interesting...
2-0. Liking it so far... Hoping Nova goes for 7 innings or so. Good for him getting a hit since he never bats. As long as he can keep the ball down while he is pitching, like last season, he should be in good shape. Come on Yanks!!!
2-0. Liking it so far... Hoping Nova goes for 7 innings or so. Good for him getting a hit since he never bats. As long as he can keep the ball down while he is pitching, like last season, he should be in good shape. Come on Yanks!!!
Haven't looked that far ahead yet. I'll post it though. I really don't bet on all the games I write about necessarily. Just like to provide the info cause I know others are throwing down all types of wagers on all the games. If I don't like it at all though (less than 55% chance of winning in my opinion), I usually just don't write about it. Unfortunately I got steered yesterday from a conversation I had, towards Boston today when my first thought was to trust more in Johnson than Beckett, but that happens. I originally thought the under was the better bet. If someone provides me with valid points and i am a bit on the fence though, I can change my mind. Nothing is concrete in those situations. If I really believe that a game is going to work out how I think it will (with like 60% certainty or more, nothing is changing my mind. I generally like to gather as much info as possible on what I think will factor into the game and go with my instincts from there.
Haven't looked that far ahead yet. I'll post it though. I really don't bet on all the games I write about necessarily. Just like to provide the info cause I know others are throwing down all types of wagers on all the games. If I don't like it at all though (less than 55% chance of winning in my opinion), I usually just don't write about it. Unfortunately I got steered yesterday from a conversation I had, towards Boston today when my first thought was to trust more in Johnson than Beckett, but that happens. I originally thought the under was the better bet. If someone provides me with valid points and i am a bit on the fence though, I can change my mind. Nothing is concrete in those situations. If I really believe that a game is going to work out how I think it will (with like 60% certainty or more, nothing is changing my mind. I generally like to gather as much info as possible on what I think will factor into the game and go with my instincts from there.
Whatever, kind of funny, but I do look at matchups ahead of time sometimes to get an idea if there is any games I will like. Then I try to figure out what would be an acceptable line, so when they come out I can look for value. I think most people do that though...
Whatever, kind of funny, but I do look at matchups ahead of time sometimes to get an idea if there is any games I will like. Then I try to figure out what would be an acceptable line, so when they come out I can look for value. I think most people do that though...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.