Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by Mcmanus: Safe to say you don't want Hoyer as a starter haha, or do you?
|
JohnAnthonybk | 5 |
|
|
11 units
|
WussieMan | 20 |
|
|
replied to
If you can't see that the CAVS are your 2015 NBA Champion you are not watching
in NBA Betting Quote Originally Posted by Scatman777: you simply cannot rely on jumpers with the shot clock dwindling except for when you're the best shooter of all time
|
bobmaloogatimesfive | 117 |
|
|
i just hit this at -155. best play on the board for this series
with the GS series price at -220, the value is there. if the warriors win this series (which they will) can you really see anyone but curry winning mvp?
|
CrazyCricket | 9 |
|
|
Under, again
|
ih8nits | 6 |
|
|
You may think you're getting "value" but the bottom line is Atlanta isn't winning the championship, so you're throwing away 10 units
|
kosmos4 | 12 |
|
|
NBA Team ATS Trends - 2-3 Days Off
Best in the league? Houston, 13-3, 81.2% #6 Clippers, 9-5
|
begginerboy | 37 |
|
|
FYI Oklahoma City is 9-3-1 ATS (75%) on no rest this season. third best in the league.
Chicago is 14-23 ATS (37.8%) after a win, fourth worst in the league. Chicago is 13-19 ATS (40.6%) at home, sixth worst in the league.
|
LongStrides | 19 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Liturgy_of_Fade: Looks like a counter-argument article: https://regressing.deadspin.com/why-those-statistics-about-the-patriots-fumbles-are-mos-1681805710/+kylenw |
begginerboy | 15 |
|
|
lacy played well for 3 quarters. he shat the bed in the 4th leading to all those 3 and outs. or maybe seattle's d just stepped up
|
glyde69 | 50 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by glyde69: Playoffs have been good to me so far. Hope to keep going. I'm sick as a dog and without thinking and without really breaking down anything, Sunday night I made this bet for 1.5 units. Teaser: NE -.5. Seattle -.5. (-120). Figured just needed the favs to win. Then I got more and more annoyed at myself as the pack +7.5 is ridiculous. So I took GB +7.5 for a unit. Meh. Got myself in a weird situation, so just hoping NE takes care of business like they "should," and maybe Seattle wins a 23-20 game and I can cash both bets. funny because i did the same exact thing last week with packers -.5 and broncos -1.5, got pissed and took cowboys +6. i actually did hit that middle but obviously manning screwed me. bol
|
glyde69 | 33 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Envy123: All I'm saying is I've never seen Bluont run for over 200 yrds and 4 TD's in any game in his career. So Graycis def the better option so yeah I agree with you, quite strange. I'm leaning Colts to finally get the monkey off there back and give N.E there all. They thrive in underdog roles and I believe Luck can get it done. The Indy Secondary is not like Baltimores, Vontae Davis and Freeman will def limit Gronk and other receivers. https://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=340111017
|
Envy123 | 11 |
|
|
agree these guys are brutal
|
clepto | 16 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by WarpedPath: Broncos are soft and their defense is weak. Broncos have a top 5 defense. |
jriv189 | 28 |
|
|
It's also been a month since the 49ers have managed to score 20 points in a game
|
jbkizzle | 6 |
|
|
Oakland and the points is the play. Remember when they beat the Chiefs 2 weeks ago?
Road favs of 7 points or more are 34% or so ATS over the last 10 years
|
jbkizzle | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Audball: KC looks like crap, raiders were the lock tonight bud. i'm on the raiders
|
Audball | 25 |
|
|
KC is a lock
|
Audball | 25 |
|
|
You said in your last thread you were done posting for the season
|
LeagueCapper | 177 |
|
|
Yards are misleading. I personally don't think that yards differential is as significant a stat as you're making it out to be.
A perfect example is the Packers, who score a lot of plays on fewer yards. Turns out Patriots and Broncos also do. These 3 teams are all in the bottom 3 for yards per point (efficiency). How about points per play differential? It's a better stat - Packers are third in the league, behind those 2 teams. Their issue is time of possession, in which they're bottom 10. That doesn't make them one of the most overrated teams
|
LeagueCapper | 9 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.