After thinking long and hard about this I will be all over the Brady Prop bets
KC is last in the NFL in sacks--just 9--and not even close to second to last--15.
Brady will be mighty comfy back there.
After thinking long and hard about this I will be all over the Brady Prop bets
KC is last in the NFL in sacks--just 9--and not even close to second to last--15.
Brady will be mighty comfy back there.
Keepin that number under 17 for a reason..
Favs of 17 or more are 6-19-1 ATS since 1991. Yes that is right. There has not been a 17 or more favorite since 2007 and low and behold, NE was 0-4 ATS in all of the 2007 games.
From 1999 to 2001...the RAMS were 3-1 ATS as 17 or more favorites!
GL
Keepin that number under 17 for a reason..
Favs of 17 or more are 6-19-1 ATS since 1991. Yes that is right. There has not been a 17 or more favorite since 2007 and low and behold, NE was 0-4 ATS in all of the 2007 games.
From 1999 to 2001...the RAMS were 3-1 ATS as 17 or more favorites!
GL
Hi Csabika25. You live in Budapest? My mother was born in Hungary so I am part Hungarian. I didn't think Hungarians would be that interested in American football but what do I know (LOL).
Anyway, appreciate your insight. I am primarily a dog player myself so hard for me to lay 16 and 1/2. May have to lay off.
Hi Csabika25. You live in Budapest? My mother was born in Hungary so I am part Hungarian. I didn't think Hungarians would be that interested in American football but what do I know (LOL).
Anyway, appreciate your insight. I am primarily a dog player myself so hard for me to lay 16 and 1/2. May have to lay off.
Keepin that number under 17 for a reason..
Favs of 17 or more are 6-19-1 ATS since 1991. Yes that is right. There has not been a 17 or more favorite since 2007 and low and behold, NE was 0-4 ATS in all of the 2007 games.
From 1999 to 2001...the RAMS were 3-1 ATS as 17 or more favorites!
GL
Keepin that number under 17 for a reason..
Favs of 17 or more are 6-19-1 ATS since 1991. Yes that is right. There has not been a 17 or more favorite since 2007 and low and behold, NE was 0-4 ATS in all of the 2007 games.
From 1999 to 2001...the RAMS were 3-1 ATS as 17 or more favorites!
GL
KC is last in the NFL in sacks--just 9--and not even close to second to last--15.
Brady will be mighty comfy back there.
KC is last in the NFL in sacks--just 9--and not even close to second to last--15.
Brady will be mighty comfy back there.
so a 13 point line is a trap, but a 16 point line is a blowout? OK then explain the steelers vs rams early in the season, 13 point line...blowout.
i have no idea why anyone with any experience comes up with nonsense like this. line numbers & moves have no bearing on the game outcome. its nothing but smoke & mirrors, designed so people come up with crazy ideas like 16 point line is a legit blowout so i will bet that. its intended to get you to bet, nothing more.
if the line were 13 or 16, it makes no difference.
so a 13 point line is a trap, but a 16 point line is a blowout? OK then explain the steelers vs rams early in the season, 13 point line...blowout.
i have no idea why anyone with any experience comes up with nonsense like this. line numbers & moves have no bearing on the game outcome. its nothing but smoke & mirrors, designed so people come up with crazy ideas like 16 point line is a legit blowout so i will bet that. its intended to get you to bet, nothing more.
if the line were 13 or 16, it makes no difference.
so a 13 point line is a trap, but a 16 point line is a blowout? OK then explain the steelers vs rams early in the season, 13 point line...blowout.
so a 13 point line is a trap, but a 16 point line is a blowout? OK then explain the steelers vs rams early in the season, 13 point line...blowout.
thanks. memory is faulty! I wish i could just bet a side just because a line is 13 vs 16 points. we could all quit our jobs & live on casino money.
thanks. memory is faulty! I wish i could just bet a side just because a line is 13 vs 16 points. we could all quit our jobs & live on casino money.
What he means, I think, is that Vegas is setting it so high so bettors or, "squares", as I hear so much on this site, jump on K.C. They dont want bettors on N.E. correct?
What he means, I think, is that Vegas is setting it so high so bettors or, "squares", as I hear so much on this site, jump on K.C. They dont want bettors on N.E. correct?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.