If you bet on Texas in the past week, they're probably the last team you want to look at tonight. However, I think it would be a mistake to not consider them in this spot. After a five-game skid, they righted the ship with great pitching and timely hitting by beating the Guardians 4-0 on Wed night. Even with the win, they still find themselves 1.5 games behind Seattle for the division lead. I think they'll find themselves on top sooner than later.
The Angels are a horrible team with a -38 run differential. You will find them in the bottom 5 of every power ranking. As bad as Texas has been playing, the reigning champs are still just outside the top 10. I anticipate them moving up the list as the season progresses. And I think a series with the Angels is coming at a good time for them.
Andrew Heaney will be on the bump for the Ranger tonight. He's been pitching much better than his record. In his last 3 starts, he's given up just 4 earned runs. Although, it's his control that's been really impressive. He hasn't walked a single batter. The Halos have only seen him for 27 ABs as a team and really only Calhoun and Pillar have had success. It's strange to write this, but Heaney needs to be very careful with Pillar tonight, even pitching around him when possible. Pillar has been on fire (10 for 16 in his past 4 games) and he does have ownage on Heaney. Bochy knows this and I believe the key will be to not let him beat them. Lol, I can't believe I'm actually writing this about Kevin Pillar.
Tyler Anderson will counter for LA. The Rangers have much more experience with him. As a team, they've seen him for 88 ABs and have hit him well. They're slashing 295 AVG/374 OBP/489 SLG/862 OPS. Corey Seager and Jonah Heim see Anderson particularly well and are a combined 16 for 35 against him. The problem with pitching around them is Texas has too many others that can and will beat you. LA doesn't have that luxury.
I'm on the Rangers at -125 (-1) for 10 units
Cheers and BOL
Traveling back today so posting will be a little spotty. Will do my best to jump in later if there are any questions or comments.
If you bet on Texas in the past week, they're probably the last team you want to look at tonight. However, I think it would be a mistake to not consider them in this spot. After a five-game skid, they righted the ship with great pitching and timely hitting by beating the Guardians 4-0 on Wed night. Even with the win, they still find themselves 1.5 games behind Seattle for the division lead. I think they'll find themselves on top sooner than later.
The Angels are a horrible team with a -38 run differential. You will find them in the bottom 5 of every power ranking. As bad as Texas has been playing, the reigning champs are still just outside the top 10. I anticipate them moving up the list as the season progresses. And I think a series with the Angels is coming at a good time for them.
Andrew Heaney will be on the bump for the Ranger tonight. He's been pitching much better than his record. In his last 3 starts, he's given up just 4 earned runs. Although, it's his control that's been really impressive. He hasn't walked a single batter. The Halos have only seen him for 27 ABs as a team and really only Calhoun and Pillar have had success. It's strange to write this, but Heaney needs to be very careful with Pillar tonight, even pitching around him when possible. Pillar has been on fire (10 for 16 in his past 4 games) and he does have ownage on Heaney. Bochy knows this and I believe the key will be to not let him beat them. Lol, I can't believe I'm actually writing this about Kevin Pillar.
Tyler Anderson will counter for LA. The Rangers have much more experience with him. As a team, they've seen him for 88 ABs and have hit him well. They're slashing 295 AVG/374 OBP/489 SLG/862 OPS. Corey Seager and Jonah Heim see Anderson particularly well and are a combined 16 for 35 against him. The problem with pitching around them is Texas has too many others that can and will beat you. LA doesn't have that luxury.
I'm on the Rangers at -125 (-1) for 10 units
Cheers and BOL
Traveling back today so posting will be a little spotty. Will do my best to jump in later if there are any questions or comments.
@umgmu Yo GMU, yes he was. Couldn’t find any meaningful data regarding facing old team. Plus, new manager and mostly new faces since he’s been there. So, didn’t really see an angle with that tonight
@umgmu Yo GMU, yes he was. Couldn’t find any meaningful data regarding facing old team. Plus, new manager and mostly new faces since he’s been there. So, didn’t really see an angle with that tonight
My man....lickin' it and splitin' it is just how I like it
E'rybody knows there are no Rangers that are Angels and there are no Angels in the Outfield in Tejas, but there are certainly Angels in the center fold so long as you are no tiny dancer if you catch my balls and strikes...
Sumptin tells me you will clip some wings tonight my good sir...just be sure her halo doesn't come with that spicy sauce
Keep stackin' that paper cause you're like an ATM machine without a pin number...
COVERS allows you to tell others they r sexually confused so long as your hands are clean
My man....lickin' it and splitin' it is just how I like it
E'rybody knows there are no Rangers that are Angels and there are no Angels in the Outfield in Tejas, but there are certainly Angels in the center fold so long as you are no tiny dancer if you catch my balls and strikes...
Sumptin tells me you will clip some wings tonight my good sir...just be sure her halo doesn't come with that spicy sauce
Keep stackin' that paper cause you're like an ATM machine without a pin number...
Where did you get -125 ? It’s all the way up to -180 -190
He's betting Texas on the run line with a -1 run handicap.
You're looking at the straight head-to-head bet. Which is safer but obviously has lower odds.
I use 5 different Australian sports books and over here most do not offer a -1 run line. Only Unibet does. Anyway the standard is -1.5 which is what I play. It has higher odds but is a bit more risky.
Where did you get -125 ? It’s all the way up to -180 -190
He's betting Texas on the run line with a -1 run handicap.
You're looking at the straight head-to-head bet. Which is safer but obviously has lower odds.
I use 5 different Australian sports books and over here most do not offer a -1 run line. Only Unibet does. Anyway the standard is -1.5 which is what I play. It has higher odds but is a bit more risky.
Ohh my bad . I didn’t realize he had the -1 run . Thought he mentioned ML . I need some caffeine And I agree as I get older and mature as a sports bettor , I prefer + a lot more than I used to. I still like my chalk in certain spots , but dogs are the red pill in this matrix
Ohh my bad . I didn’t realize he had the -1 run . Thought he mentioned ML . I need some caffeine And I agree as I get older and mature as a sports bettor , I prefer + a lot more than I used to. I still like my chalk in certain spots , but dogs are the red pill in this matrix
My books don’t ever offer -1 only 1.5 which I’ve been still playing and been lucky enough to keep winning. My question is where do you find that line ? Is it in a different section ?
My books don’t ever offer -1 only 1.5 which I’ve been still playing and been lucky enough to keep winning. My question is where do you find that line ? Is it in a different section ?
It's under alternative lines, if you book has them. Like with mine, there's a little box next to the game itself, and if you click it, it shows all the alt lines and other props.
It's under alternative lines, if you book has them. Like with mine, there's a little box next to the game itself, and if you click it, it shows all the alt lines and other props.
@Kaufee My books don’t ever offer -1 only 1.5 which I’ve been still playing and been lucky enough to keep winning. My question is where do you find that line ? Is it in a different section ?
You don't need a special book to bet a -1 runline you do it yourself in 2 simple bets. Bet moneyline, risk amount to win bet amount equivalent to the risk amount on the runline. That way if it is a 1 run win, then it's a push. This is really very basic mathematics here. But the key is by doing it the way I suggest you will usually gain a few cents on the dollar. You avoid the convenience fee, if you catch my drift.
@Kaufee My books don’t ever offer -1 only 1.5 which I’ve been still playing and been lucky enough to keep winning. My question is where do you find that line ? Is it in a different section ?
You don't need a special book to bet a -1 runline you do it yourself in 2 simple bets. Bet moneyline, risk amount to win bet amount equivalent to the risk amount on the runline. That way if it is a 1 run win, then it's a push. This is really very basic mathematics here. But the key is by doing it the way I suggest you will usually gain a few cents on the dollar. You avoid the convenience fee, if you catch my drift.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.