it is interesting how two people on opposite ends of the spectrum can look at the same alleged facts and interpret them completely differently. i.e. posts 19 and 20.
The same could be said for any of posts 1-25 that is drawing a conclusion.
The information provided does not contradict two different theories that drive the case:
1) That George Zimmerman was legitimately and reasonably in fear of his life when he fired the gun; and
2) That George Zimmerman initiated the confrontation that led to number 1.
The first theory is put forward by the defense, the second by the prosecution.
It is interesting to note that no ballistics information has been presented. I guess tests were not conducted.
it is interesting how two people on opposite ends of the spectrum can look at the same alleged facts and interpret them completely differently. i.e. posts 19 and 20.
The same could be said for any of posts 1-25 that is drawing a conclusion.
The information provided does not contradict two different theories that drive the case:
1) That George Zimmerman was legitimately and reasonably in fear of his life when he fired the gun; and
2) That George Zimmerman initiated the confrontation that led to number 1.
The first theory is put forward by the defense, the second by the prosecution.
It is interesting to note that no ballistics information has been presented. I guess tests were not conducted.
No. If the drug dealing, thieving, criminal pos had left his fucked up attitude and gold grill at home, he'd still be alive. Instead he attacked a man that was protecting his home turf and got what was coming to him at one point or another. obama and the rest of the black community as well as the media owe the Zimmerman family a huge apology.
No. If the drug dealing, thieving, criminal pos had left his fucked up attitude and gold grill at home, he'd still be alive. Instead he attacked a man that was protecting his home turf and got what was coming to him at one point or another. obama and the rest of the black community as well as the media owe the Zimmerman family a huge apology.
It is interesting to note that no ballistics information has been presented. I guess tests were not conducted
On Monday, Corey's office gave O'Mara a copy of a motion it had drafted, asking that certain information in the case be protected from public disclosure. It's not clear whether she wants more than witness names kept secret.
It is interesting to note that no ballistics information has been presented. I guess tests were not conducted
On Monday, Corey's office gave O'Mara a copy of a motion it had drafted, asking that certain information in the case be protected from public disclosure. It's not clear whether she wants more than witness names kept secret.
Special prosecutor Angela Corey knew of all the information in this thread posted by 14daroad, but yet still decided to charge g. zimmerman with 2nd degree murder. So all of you zimmerman cheerleaders should stop hyperventilating with excitement every time a piece of new info is released to the public about this case. Most of you act like this case is a LOCK for the defense attorneys. I wonder how many of the buzzards eating away at T. Martin's flesh have children of their own.
Special prosecutor Angela Corey knew of all the information in this thread posted by 14daroad, but yet still decided to charge g. zimmerman with 2nd degree murder. So all of you zimmerman cheerleaders should stop hyperventilating with excitement every time a piece of new info is released to the public about this case. Most of you act like this case is a LOCK for the defense attorneys. I wonder how many of the buzzards eating away at T. Martin's flesh have children of their own.
Special prosecutor Angela Corey knew of all the information in this thread posted by 14daroad, but yet still decided to charge g. zimmerman with 2nd degree murder. So all of you zimmerman cheerleaders should stop hyperventilating with excitement every time a piece of new info is released to the public about this case. Most of you act like this case is a LOCK for the defense attorneys. I wonder how many of the buzzards eating away at T. Martin's flesh have children of their own.
Perhaps she was afraid her life depended on it? I don't blame her. I would have done the same thing.
Special prosecutor Angela Corey knew of all the information in this thread posted by 14daroad, but yet still decided to charge g. zimmerman with 2nd degree murder. So all of you zimmerman cheerleaders should stop hyperventilating with excitement every time a piece of new info is released to the public about this case. Most of you act like this case is a LOCK for the defense attorneys. I wonder how many of the buzzards eating away at T. Martin's flesh have children of their own.
Perhaps she was afraid her life depended on it? I don't blame her. I would have done the same thing.
Special prosecutor Angela Corey knew of all the information in this thread posted by 14daroad, but yet still decided to charge g. zimmerman with 2nd degree murder. So all of you zimmerman cheerleaders should stop hyperventilating with excitement every time a piece of new info is released to the public about this case. Most of you act like this case is a LOCK for the defense attorneys. I wonder how many of the buzzards eating away at T. Martin's flesh have children of their own.
Right, which is a commentary on all that is wrong with this country. And truth be told, SHE didn't personally decide anything.
Special prosecutor Angela Corey knew of all the information in this thread posted by 14daroad, but yet still decided to charge g. zimmerman with 2nd degree murder. So all of you zimmerman cheerleaders should stop hyperventilating with excitement every time a piece of new info is released to the public about this case. Most of you act like this case is a LOCK for the defense attorneys. I wonder how many of the buzzards eating away at T. Martin's flesh have children of their own.
Right, which is a commentary on all that is wrong with this country. And truth be told, SHE didn't personally decide anything.
Perhaps she was afraid her life depended on it? I don't blame her. I would have done the same thing.
What a great police officer you would have made. No gang or mafia member arrested on your shift.
As an aside, prosecutors face charging decisions day in and day out where their decision could risk their life. To suggest that this case somehow trumps those is pure ignorance of the system.
Perhaps she was afraid her life depended on it? I don't blame her. I would have done the same thing.
What a great police officer you would have made. No gang or mafia member arrested on your shift.
As an aside, prosecutors face charging decisions day in and day out where their decision could risk their life. To suggest that this case somehow trumps those is pure ignorance of the system.
She ceded to pressure, either public or from superiors. Or perhaps you believe she prosecutes cases in a vacuum.
the way you worded that was confusing. she did personally make the decision. however, it was influenced by the public (technically, she doesn't have any superiors). but it would be more accurate to say that she was influenced by political pressure.
She ceded to pressure, either public or from superiors. Or perhaps you believe she prosecutes cases in a vacuum.
the way you worded that was confusing. she did personally make the decision. however, it was influenced by the public (technically, she doesn't have any superiors). but it would be more accurate to say that she was influenced by political pressure.
What a great police officer you would have made. No gang or mafia member arrested on your shift.
As an aside, prosecutors face charging decisions day in and day out where their decision could risk their life. To suggest that this case somehow trumps those is pure ignorance of the system.
Name a case as high profile as this? To suggest that this isn't one of the highest profile cases with unique circumstances is what is ignorant.
What a great police officer you would have made. No gang or mafia member arrested on your shift.
As an aside, prosecutors face charging decisions day in and day out where their decision could risk their life. To suggest that this case somehow trumps those is pure ignorance of the system.
Name a case as high profile as this? To suggest that this isn't one of the highest profile cases with unique circumstances is what is ignorant.
What a great police officer you would have made. No gang or mafia member arrested on your shift.
As an aside, prosecutors face charging decisions day in and day out where their decision could risk their life. To suggest that this case somehow trumps those is pure ignorance of the system.
Since when do we prefer mafia members brought up and arrested on state charges with limited resorces when they can be refered to the feds?
What a great police officer you would have made. No gang or mafia member arrested on your shift.
As an aside, prosecutors face charging decisions day in and day out where their decision could risk their life. To suggest that this case somehow trumps those is pure ignorance of the system.
Since when do we prefer mafia members brought up and arrested on state charges with limited resorces when they can be refered to the feds?
the way you worded that was confusing. she did personally make the decision. however, it was influenced by the public (technically, she doesn't have any superiors). but it would be more accurate to say that she was influenced by political pressure.
the way you worded that was confusing. she did personally make the decision. however, it was influenced by the public (technically, she doesn't have any superiors). but it would be more accurate to say that she was influenced by political pressure.
the way you worded that was confusing. she did personally make the decision. however, it was influenced by the public (technically, she doesn't have any superiors). but it would be more accurate to say that she was influenced by political pressure.
Then you must be confused or easily baffled as you have absolutely no idea what decision she personally made, other than that she chose to continue working at her job and do what it took to do so.
the way you worded that was confusing. she did personally make the decision. however, it was influenced by the public (technically, she doesn't have any superiors). but it would be more accurate to say that she was influenced by political pressure.
Then you must be confused or easily baffled as you have absolutely no idea what decision she personally made, other than that she chose to continue working at her job and do what it took to do so.
You don't see how this has become a political topic?
Maybe you didn't catch the political shows for the past 2 months.
Topic is not political... I get that political shows are milking this for viewers and ratings... I get that politicians are milking this...
but these little details and extremists assumptions on the topic are not political... I get that the brain washed followers of political shows and politicians are hyperfocused on this single case from months ago... So it is like a "brain washed litmus test"... It is only a small group of posters that seem to be so passionate about this non-political topic and posting about it here...
mainly because if we were to actually talk about politics in the politics section the we all know what will happen
Talk about obama's reaction to this Im on board... But like what we saw with the "FAIL rush bust" thread... talking about political shows is not a political topic...
You don't see how this has become a political topic?
Maybe you didn't catch the political shows for the past 2 months.
Topic is not political... I get that political shows are milking this for viewers and ratings... I get that politicians are milking this...
but these little details and extremists assumptions on the topic are not political... I get that the brain washed followers of political shows and politicians are hyperfocused on this single case from months ago... So it is like a "brain washed litmus test"... It is only a small group of posters that seem to be so passionate about this non-political topic and posting about it here...
mainly because if we were to actually talk about politics in the politics section the we all know what will happen
Talk about obama's reaction to this Im on board... But like what we saw with the "FAIL rush bust" thread... talking about political shows is not a political topic...
it is interesting how two people on opposite ends of the spectrum of reality can look at the same alleged facts and interpret them completely differently. i.e. posts 19 and 20.
it is interesting how two people on opposite ends of the spectrum of reality can look at the same alleged facts and interpret them completely differently. i.e. posts 19 and 20.
What a great police officer you would have made. No gang or mafia member arrested on your shift.
As an aside, prosecutors face charging decisions day in and day out where their decision could risk their life. To suggest that this case somehow trumps those is pure ignorance of the system.
Pretending she didn't bow to political pressure is simply silly & obscene.
Given that every available fact that has come to light has refuted all your assertions, are you remotely interested in not making any more assertions?
What a great police officer you would have made. No gang or mafia member arrested on your shift.
As an aside, prosecutors face charging decisions day in and day out where their decision could risk their life. To suggest that this case somehow trumps those is pure ignorance of the system.
Pretending she didn't bow to political pressure is simply silly & obscene.
Given that every available fact that has come to light has refuted all your assertions, are you remotely interested in not making any more assertions?
It is interesting to note that no ballistics information has been presented. I guess tests were not conducted.
Oh really?
Details from Trayvon Martin's autopsy show the bullet entered the left side of his chest, and shattered the ventrical, one of his heart's two large chambers but the round did not leave his body.
It is interesting to note that no ballistics information has been presented. I guess tests were not conducted.
Oh really?
Details from Trayvon Martin's autopsy show the bullet entered the left side of his chest, and shattered the ventrical, one of his heart's two large chambers but the round did not leave his body.
Details from Trayvon Martin's autopsy show the bullet entered the left side of his chest, and shattered the ventrical, one of his heart's two large chambers but the round did not leave his body.
The reports also noted the fatal wound's surrounded by a two-by-two inch pattern called stippling, caused by gunpower burns. It suggests Zimmerman fired inches away from the teenager.
=======================
Remember when you carried on that no ballistics were conducted because you took what the funeral director said at face value?
An autopsy is not a ballistics test.
If you were really an attorney, you would know that.
Details from Trayvon Martin's autopsy show the bullet entered the left side of his chest, and shattered the ventrical, one of his heart's two large chambers but the round did not leave his body.
The reports also noted the fatal wound's surrounded by a two-by-two inch pattern called stippling, caused by gunpower burns. It suggests Zimmerman fired inches away from the teenager.
=======================
Remember when you carried on that no ballistics were conducted because you took what the funeral director said at face value?
An autopsy is not a ballistics test.
If you were really an attorney, you would know that.
Then you must be confused or easily baffled as you have absolutely no idea what decision she personally made, other than that she chose to continue working at her job and do what it took to do so.
i'm not sure if you understand that we are pretty much saying the same thing. and i do admit to be easily confused by what some people on here post.
Then you must be confused or easily baffled as you have absolutely no idea what decision she personally made, other than that she chose to continue working at her job and do what it took to do so.
i'm not sure if you understand that we are pretty much saying the same thing. and i do admit to be easily confused by what some people on here post.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.