Libs like guns.
Assault weapons are a diff matter tho.
There needs to be more clarification on valid guns.
At some point, guns should not be legal.
Fully automatic machine guns serve no purpose in today's society. But Long Guns and Handguns do.
There needs to be more clarification on valid guns.
At some point, guns should not be legal.
Fully automatic machine guns serve no purpose in today's society. But Long Guns and Handguns do.
Sorry for the mutliple posts but just thought it through.
Fried would be in favor of "Long Guns"........... but see no need for assault weapon / machine guns..... or even hand guns.
Sorry for the mutliple posts but just thought it through.
Fried would be in favor of "Long Guns"........... but see no need for assault weapon / machine guns..... or even hand guns.
Linkin Park I can certainly understand.
Justin Beber?
Linkin Park I can certainly understand.
Justin Beber?
Defensive Gun Uses Save the U.S. One Trillion Dollars Per Year
That was too easy.
The Kleck-Gertz DGU (defensive gun use) study estimated that there are between 2.1 and 2.5 million DGUs a year in the U.S. The Ludwig-Cook study came up with 1.46 million. So let’s split the difference and call it 1.88 million DGUs per year.
In the K-G article Armed Resistance to Crime: The Prevalence and Nature of Self-Defense with a Gun, 15.7 percent of people who had a DGU reckoned they almost certainly saved a life. Ignoring the ‘probably’ and ‘might have’ saved a life categories for simplicity, 15.7 percent of 1.88 million gives us 295,160 lives saved annually.
i'm all for any study there the word "reckoned" and a key number on which the study is based are used together. i'm sure bubba and wilbur didn't inflate the importance of their defensive gun use when they were polled for this unbiased study. whatever they reckoned must be acurate. i would like to know if protecting the value of one's meth lab from some tweaked out redneck with a whiffle ball bat was included in the savings.
i reckon that i'm going to find a study that says gun use saves the US 100 trillion dollars a month. i'm going to mosey on over the some nra site and see what i can find. i reckon i'll be back here with the results.
Defensive Gun Uses Save the U.S. One Trillion Dollars Per Year
That was too easy.
The Kleck-Gertz DGU (defensive gun use) study estimated that there are between 2.1 and 2.5 million DGUs a year in the U.S. The Ludwig-Cook study came up with 1.46 million. So let’s split the difference and call it 1.88 million DGUs per year.
In the K-G article Armed Resistance to Crime: The Prevalence and Nature of Self-Defense with a Gun, 15.7 percent of people who had a DGU reckoned they almost certainly saved a life. Ignoring the ‘probably’ and ‘might have’ saved a life categories for simplicity, 15.7 percent of 1.88 million gives us 295,160 lives saved annually.
i'm all for any study there the word "reckoned" and a key number on which the study is based are used together. i'm sure bubba and wilbur didn't inflate the importance of their defensive gun use when they were polled for this unbiased study. whatever they reckoned must be acurate. i would like to know if protecting the value of one's meth lab from some tweaked out redneck with a whiffle ball bat was included in the savings.
i reckon that i'm going to find a study that says gun use saves the US 100 trillion dollars a month. i'm going to mosey on over the some nra site and see what i can find. i reckon i'll be back here with the results.
The Kleck-Gertz DGU (defensive gun use) study estimated that there are between 2.1 and 2.5 million DGUs a year in the U.S. The Ludwig-Cook study came up with 1.46 million. So let’s split the difference and call it 1.88 million DGUs per year.
In the K-G article Armed Resistance to Crime: The Prevalence and Nature of Self-Defense with a Gun, 15.7 percent of people who had a DGU reckoned they almost certainly saved a life. Ignoring the ‘probably’ and ‘might have’ saved a life categories for simplicity, 15.7 percent of 1.88 million gives us 295,160 lives saved annually.
i'm all for any study there the word "reckoned" and a key number on which the study is based are used together. i'm sure bubba and wilbur didn't inflate the importance of their defensive gun use when they were polled for this unbiased study. whatever they reckoned must be acurate. i would like to know if protecting the value of one's meth lab from some tweaked out redneck with a whiffle ball bat was included in the savings.
i reckon that i'm going to find a study that says gun use saves the US 100 trillion dollars a month. i'm going to mosey on over the some nra site and see what i can find. i reckon i'll be back here with the results.
The Kleck-Gertz DGU (defensive gun use) study estimated that there are between 2.1 and 2.5 million DGUs a year in the U.S. The Ludwig-Cook study came up with 1.46 million. So let’s split the difference and call it 1.88 million DGUs per year.
In the K-G article Armed Resistance to Crime: The Prevalence and Nature of Self-Defense with a Gun, 15.7 percent of people who had a DGU reckoned they almost certainly saved a life. Ignoring the ‘probably’ and ‘might have’ saved a life categories for simplicity, 15.7 percent of 1.88 million gives us 295,160 lives saved annually.
i'm all for any study there the word "reckoned" and a key number on which the study is based are used together. i'm sure bubba and wilbur didn't inflate the importance of their defensive gun use when they were polled for this unbiased study. whatever they reckoned must be acurate. i would like to know if protecting the value of one's meth lab from some tweaked out redneck with a whiffle ball bat was included in the savings.
i reckon that i'm going to find a study that says gun use saves the US 100 trillion dollars a month. i'm going to mosey on over the some nra site and see what i can find. i reckon i'll be back here with the results.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.