Our new forums will be launched soon. Check it out for yourself.

Cleveland at Green Bay (08/16/2012)

Forum: Pro Football
Author: [Pro Football] Topic: Cleveland at Green Bay (08/16/2012)
Covers PM Covers
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 61
Participation Meter
Posted: 8/14/2012 5:54:37 AM

Away:  Cleveland [0-0 ATS]
Home:  Green Bay [0-0 ATS]

Game Time: 8:00 PM
Stadium: Lambeau Field

Recent Meetings:

Team Leaders:

Passing: N/A (0)
Rushing: N/A (0)
Receiving: N/A (0)

Green Bay:
Passing: N/A (0)
Rushing: N/A (0)
Receiving: N/A (0)

Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

WinsNow999 PM WinsNow999
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7489
Participation Meter
Posted: 8/14/2012 8:50:35 PM
Browns +3 in the heart beat
Coloneljim PM Coloneljim
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 13856
Participation Meter
Posted: 8/15/2012 9:09:18 AM

Green Bay 5-1 ats in week 2 last 6...

Green Bay - 23                                Cleveland - 5

Packers -3                                   under 40.5

I'll stick with the hot trend and take the Pack to rebound off a su loss.

Green Bay - Under

Cyrax PM Cyrax
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 22790
Participation Meter
Hall of Fame
Posted: 8/15/2012 10:55:41 PM
I'm with you Colonel ... I'm taking the Packers
bkg1010 PM bkg1010
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 5818
Participation Meter
Posted: 8/16/2012 8:48:50 AM
Packers minus the small chalk. What the Colonel said.
Jlavin PM Jlavin
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 219
Participation Meter
Posted: 8/16/2012 1:06:08 PM
Browns will be testing alot of guys out tonight, after losing  Joe Haden, Chris Gocong, and  Trent Richardson.   Let alone  Phil Taylor and  Scott Fujita back in May.  
They may be ok after week 4, but this is NOT week 4.....GB -3 is teh pick.
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 0
Participation Meter
Posted: 8/16/2012 2:39:21 PM

got to go with the better backup qb's take da points


BostonGeorge24 PM BostonGeorge24
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 329
Participation Meter
Posted: 8/16/2012 4:12:58 PM
I'm on the pack but a little worried because Colt and Seneca are wayyyyyyyy better than Harrell and Coleman. 
jo14014 PM jo14014
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4932
Participation Meter
Posted: 8/16/2012 4:42:27 PM
Goldfisch PM Goldfisch
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 675
Participation Meter
Posted: 8/16/2012 6:53:27 PM
QUOTE Originally Posted by BostonGeorge24:

I'm on the pack but a little worried because Colt and Seneca are wayyyyyyyy better than Harrell and Coleman. 

I am with you Boston, plus, I looked at GB's defensive backfield and they are all inexperienced ( the backups). Woodson wont be playing and I doubt that the kid from Louisiana {cant think of his name, but he is an all pro cb} will be playing today and if so not for long. With that said, every qb on the Browns roster is working for their spot and Colt wants to prove that he should be the starter. All in all, reverse line movement, the poor running game of GB and poor Db's, I had to go with the Browns. 
Forum: Pro Football
You have entered the forum as a GUEST. 
You must login/register to post or reply.
Desktop View: Switch to Mobile View