since my live ingames are cut short, I will take 1 last pregame for today:
Sugita ML @+112
Todays result:
Sharapova ingame Win
Putinseva ingame Win
since my live ingames are cut short, I will take 1 last pregame for today:
Sugita ML @+112
Todays result:
Sharapova ingame Win
Putinseva ingame Win
since my live ingames are cut short, I will take 1 last pregame for today:
Sugita ML @+112
Todays result:
Sharapova ingame Win
Putinseva ingame Win
Do you find you pay much juice in game mate? I assume you take them after a break or something? Or only ever at +odds?
Sorry for questions just intrigued.
I have no idea how to work out if a bet is + EV in game.
Do you find you pay much juice in game mate? I assume you take them after a break or something? Or only ever at +odds?
Sorry for questions just intrigued.
I have no idea how to work out if a bet is + EV in game.
adding:
WNBA Mystics +1.5 @-110
adding:
WNBA Mystics +1.5 @-110
Sorry for the late reply to your question as I have been capping the WNBA game earlier for about 2 hours and watching it.
I take short odds all the time during "live ingames" with an avg. strike rate of about 90%(I try to aim for 95%+ strike rate).
I cap the games, and if the plays are going according to my cap, I strike whether the odds are -300 or +150...
There is nothing wrong with taking short odds ingame, as long as you manage your BR(such as wagering 5% of your BR on a -200 to gain a net profit of +2.5% ROI or wagering 0.5% of your BR on a +300 to gain a net profit of +1.5% ROI...
What I see as foolishness is, taking these short odds "PREGAME". Thats just sheer stupidity. I try to limit myself to right around the -200 mark max for a pregame. But I hate pregames unless I have a strong feel for it while I cap it, such as the WNBA game tonight(which was a blowout in my favor). The Sugita pregame was not capped at all, but more of an impulse wager due to my frustration with all the WTA matches getting rained out, and since it was the last tennis match of the day, I wagered it out of stupidity.
Sharapova match was taken at -125 ingame: I knew the rookie had no chance vs Maria. But what I needed to confirm was her return from shoulder injury and her time off recently. Once I saw her going, thats when I striked.
Putinseva @-222 ingame: Watched the 1st set to make sure there was nothing fishy, and I striked on the 2nd set. Cmon, we're talking Dart here... Don't matter if she's playing on her home turf....
There are many other things I do during ingames which you would not understand.... Such as I might take a losing side at +200, only to hedge with the other side at lets say +300, for a guaranteed profit. This happens alot in WTA, and that is why I prefer to do live ingames with WTA over ATP...
Or I might take one side at +120, and take the other side at +130 during like the first 3 or 4 games of set 1 if the starting lines were a pickem... I have many strategies for ingame, and they are too much to list here, and you wouldn't understand half of them for your reasoning....
Anyways, BOL to ya bud, I will celebrate my WNBA win tonight, which I went a little Large, and start capping for tomorrows matches on Tennis.
May you have a profitable day tomorrow bud!!! :))
lol
Sorry for the late reply to your question as I have been capping the WNBA game earlier for about 2 hours and watching it.
I take short odds all the time during "live ingames" with an avg. strike rate of about 90%(I try to aim for 95%+ strike rate).
I cap the games, and if the plays are going according to my cap, I strike whether the odds are -300 or +150...
There is nothing wrong with taking short odds ingame, as long as you manage your BR(such as wagering 5% of your BR on a -200 to gain a net profit of +2.5% ROI or wagering 0.5% of your BR on a +300 to gain a net profit of +1.5% ROI...
What I see as foolishness is, taking these short odds "PREGAME". Thats just sheer stupidity. I try to limit myself to right around the -200 mark max for a pregame. But I hate pregames unless I have a strong feel for it while I cap it, such as the WNBA game tonight(which was a blowout in my favor). The Sugita pregame was not capped at all, but more of an impulse wager due to my frustration with all the WTA matches getting rained out, and since it was the last tennis match of the day, I wagered it out of stupidity.
Sharapova match was taken at -125 ingame: I knew the rookie had no chance vs Maria. But what I needed to confirm was her return from shoulder injury and her time off recently. Once I saw her going, thats when I striked.
Putinseva @-222 ingame: Watched the 1st set to make sure there was nothing fishy, and I striked on the 2nd set. Cmon, we're talking Dart here... Don't matter if she's playing on her home turf....
There are many other things I do during ingames which you would not understand.... Such as I might take a losing side at +200, only to hedge with the other side at lets say +300, for a guaranteed profit. This happens alot in WTA, and that is why I prefer to do live ingames with WTA over ATP...
Or I might take one side at +120, and take the other side at +130 during like the first 3 or 4 games of set 1 if the starting lines were a pickem... I have many strategies for ingame, and they are too much to list here, and you wouldn't understand half of them for your reasoning....
Anyways, BOL to ya bud, I will celebrate my WNBA win tonight, which I went a little Large, and start capping for tomorrows matches on Tennis.
May you have a profitable day tomorrow bud!!! :))
lol
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.