Maybe this is pure tunnel vision right now, but i absolutely love the way shes killing her opponents without mercy, and she looks as fit and happy on the court as ive ever seen her...she may easily win Toronto, then may even take Cincinnati off just to stay fresh.
Maybe this is pure tunnel vision right now, but i absolutely love the way shes killing her opponents without mercy, and she looks as fit and happy on the court as ive ever seen her...she may easily win Toronto, then may even take Cincinnati off just to stay fresh.
Lets get this circus act started early: Sloane Stephens to win +1200...500/6500 Maybe this is pure tunnel vision right now, but i absolutely love the way shes killing her opponents without mercy, and she looks as fit and happy on the court as ive ever seen her...she may easily win Toronto, then may even take Cincinnati off just to stay fresh.
Lets get this circus act started early: Sloane Stephens to win +1200...500/6500 Maybe this is pure tunnel vision right now, but i absolutely love the way shes killing her opponents without mercy, and she looks as fit and happy on the court as ive ever seen her...she may easily win Toronto, then may even take Cincinnati off just to stay fresh.
Rodionova +3.5 games (-115)....Pegula shouldnt be favored here in my opinion by these odds...this is a coinflip type match from what i see and the dog here has just as goood a chance to win SU here...getting 3.5 games seems too good to be true versus a very erratic player in Pegula...i will take the bait here.
Fyi...Pegula is the daughter of the Buffalo Sabres and Bills co owner Terry Pegula...this is the classic example of a rich spoiled kid like Gulbis playing tennis as a "career" because they dont ever want to grow up and get a real job...i will always look to fade princesses like these wherever possible and potentially profitable.
Rodionova +3.5 games (-115)....Pegula shouldnt be favored here in my opinion by these odds...this is a coinflip type match from what i see and the dog here has just as goood a chance to win SU here...getting 3.5 games seems too good to be true versus a very erratic player in Pegula...i will take the bait here.
Fyi...Pegula is the daughter of the Buffalo Sabres and Bills co owner Terry Pegula...this is the classic example of a rich spoiled kid like Gulbis playing tennis as a "career" because they dont ever want to grow up and get a real job...i will always look to fade princesses like these wherever possible and potentially profitable.
Kiki falls into the same category for me as the following:
Svitolina, Plishkova, Keys, Kasatkina, Goerges, Mertens, Garcia, Barty, Sevastova...all nice players capable of winning on any given day, but not ready to string 7 wins in a row to win a slam...until proven otherwsie, i wont be betting these on futures markets.
Kiki falls into the same category for me as the following:
Svitolina, Plishkova, Keys, Kasatkina, Goerges, Mertens, Garcia, Barty, Sevastova...all nice players capable of winning on any given day, but not ready to string 7 wins in a row to win a slam...until proven otherwsie, i wont be betting these on futures markets.
For all we know, Serena wont make it into the 2nd week, and Pliskova/Muguruza would both be upsets in my opinion based on their form to make it to the QFs
For all we know, Serena wont make it into the 2nd week, and Pliskova/Muguruza would both be upsets in my opinion based on their form to make it to the QFs
Gibbs doesnt deserve to be this big a fav vs anyone with the past pedigree like Govortsova...obviously this is a huge comeback attempt for Govort, but i will gladly take the dog here...Gibbs is just another american fraud who can essentially lose to anyone on any given day.
Gibbs doesnt deserve to be this big a fav vs anyone with the past pedigree like Govortsova...obviously this is a huge comeback attempt for Govort, but i will gladly take the dog here...Gibbs is just another american fraud who can essentially lose to anyone on any given day.
i feel like kvitova has the easiest draw among the top 5. she really only has wozniacki in her draw, and shes beaten her the last 4 times. she'll potentially face sabalenka in the 3R, but thats the only real challenge i see before the semis.
i hope her "injury" yesterday was just so she gets out and rests before the US open
i feel like kvitova has the easiest draw among the top 5. she really only has wozniacki in her draw, and shes beaten her the last 4 times. she'll potentially face sabalenka in the 3R, but thats the only real challenge i see before the semis.
i hope her "injury" yesterday was just so she gets out and rests before the US open
Svitolina, Plishkova, Keys, Kasatkina, Goerges, Mertens, Garcia, Barty, Sevastova...all nice players capable of winning on any given day, but not ready to string 7 wins in a row to win a slam...until proven otherwsie, i wont be betting these on futures markets.
I agree. Don't see any of these winning. Going to take out the Williams sisters also. I liked Halep but she has played alot and wander how much she will have in the tank.
Svitolina, Plishkova, Keys, Kasatkina, Goerges, Mertens, Garcia, Barty, Sevastova...all nice players capable of winning on any given day, but not ready to string 7 wins in a row to win a slam...until proven otherwsie, i wont be betting these on futures markets.
I agree. Don't see any of these winning. Going to take out the Williams sisters also. I liked Halep but she has played alot and wander how much she will have in the tank.
Gibbs doesnt deserve to be this big a fav vs anyone with the past pedigree like Govortsova...obviously this is a huge comeback attempt for Govort, but i will gladly take the dog here...Gibbs is just another american fraud who can essentially lose to anyone on any given day.
the calls of the linesmen were terrible on this one, seems like every US player gets free points now and then. No hawkeye = cheat.
Gibbs doesnt deserve to be this big a fav vs anyone with the past pedigree like Govortsova...obviously this is a huge comeback attempt for Govort, but i will gladly take the dog here...Gibbs is just another american fraud who can essentially lose to anyone on any given day.
the calls of the linesmen were terrible on this one, seems like every US player gets free points now and then. No hawkeye = cheat.
MadSkillz...theres nothing i can do but move on...Govort was in this match and on pace to likely cover the spread 64 64, but at 3-1 down serving in the 2nd set, like you pointed out, the lines calls went in favor of the american, and you could tell Govort was on the verge of tears trying to plead her cade for fairness to the ump to no avail...highly questionable match here but this should remind me to back off of qualifier matches where shady stuff can always happen.
MadSkillz...theres nothing i can do but move on...Govort was in this match and on pace to likely cover the spread 64 64, but at 3-1 down serving in the 2nd set, like you pointed out, the lines calls went in favor of the american, and you could tell Govort was on the verge of tears trying to plead her cade for fairness to the ump to no avail...highly questionable match here but this should remind me to back off of qualifier matches where shady stuff can always happen.
Serena Under 18.5 games (+100)...total risk as no one really knows Serenas true fitness levels coming into this event...im a sucker and believe Linette will be starstruck and forget how to play basic tennis in the first set and get rolled something like 62...then a straightforward 64 2nd set cashes the under...hopefully
Serena Under 18.5 games (+100)...total risk as no one really knows Serenas true fitness levels coming into this event...im a sucker and believe Linette will be starstruck and forget how to play basic tennis in the first set and get rolled something like 62...then a straightforward 64 2nd set cashes the under...hopefully
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.