Add... Clemson +7. 1u This line shot up 3 points since the beginning of the week! Hope I'm on the right side. I liked it at 4 so I might lay half a unit on the ML. LSU can give up a lot on big plays, an Clemson can put out big plays. Like the D Coordinator and with extra prep time this Clemson D is hopefully not a bad as the past. Lol. I'm up for the day at 3-0 so imma balls this one. Good luck!
Add... Clemson +7. 1u This line shot up 3 points since the beginning of the week! Hope I'm on the right side. I liked it at 4 so I might lay half a unit on the ML. LSU can give up a lot on big plays, an Clemson can put out big plays. Like the D Coordinator and with extra prep time this Clemson D is hopefully not a bad as the past. Lol. I'm up for the day at 3-0 so imma balls this one. Good luck!
Anyone got a good site for percentages on wagers (public and so on)? I was feeling Northwestern until I saw everyone and their moms on it in this forum. I understand that this forum is not necessarily the "general" public but every time I've seen this happen, it hasn't ended well. Lol. 5-0 today, 6-0 with one of my hoops picks. Because of that I should just put it in I guess, being that its house money. Any sites that are fairly spot on?????
Anyone got a good site for percentages on wagers (public and so on)? I was feeling Northwestern until I saw everyone and their moms on it in this forum. I understand that this forum is not necessarily the "general" public but every time I've seen this happen, it hasn't ended well. Lol. 5-0 today, 6-0 with one of my hoops picks. Because of that I should just put it in I guess, being that its house money. Any sites that are fairly spot on?????
Add... Wisky/Stanford over 46.5. 2u Bought the 47.5 prebowl season and no longer like it so going double the other way. Would be nice for it to land on 47...lol. Alohaz
Add... Wisky/Stanford over 46.5. 2u Bought the 47.5 prebowl season and no longer like it so going double the other way. Would be nice for it to land on 47...lol. Alohaz
Well. Still up for the week. I thought Lynch would have a better game being that he talked all that shit about his offense. He lost that game in my opinion. Off target all day and missed some bounce off tackle when they were open. Next up! Still up 2 units to start the week. The week DID just start although there were a lot of games. See tomorrow!
Well. Still up for the week. I thought Lynch would have a better game being that he talked all that shit about his offense. He lost that game in my opinion. Off target all day and missed some bounce off tackle when they were open. Next up! Still up 2 units to start the week. The week DID just start although there were a lot of games. See tomorrow!
I guess I never learn. I've done some crazier shit when I play with house money (Hawaii over Georgia 2007). Oh well, I feel a little more confident on this one than last nights. Add... Louisville +14.5. 2u Louisville ML@+450. .4u
I guess I never learn. I've done some crazier shit when I play with house money (Hawaii over Georgia 2007). Oh well, I feel a little more confident on this one than last nights. Add... Louisville +14.5. 2u Louisville ML@+450. .4u
I have aTm at -4.5 that I got when the lines came out. I don't think I'll jump off of this one. It currently sits at 3 and I'm not getting it. aTm has a decent defense but my wager wasn't placed on that or Manziel as the reason. The reason I love this game is aTms two offensive tackles and their RB. Oklahoma can try and do the Oregon and run a 5-2-4 defense but I don't think it will matter. Running five DLineman might help them penetrate or stuff the middle but Manziel is better when he's on the move and those two tackles shouldn't let anyone get deep in the backfield or contain him. Just my thoughts. If anyone has some insight, please feel free to drop some. Common goal for all of us, right? Aloha!
I have aTm at -4.5 that I got when the lines came out. I don't think I'll jump off of this one. It currently sits at 3 and I'm not getting it. aTm has a decent defense but my wager wasn't placed on that or Manziel as the reason. The reason I love this game is aTms two offensive tackles and their RB. Oklahoma can try and do the Oregon and run a 5-2-4 defense but I don't think it will matter. Running five DLineman might help them penetrate or stuff the middle but Manziel is better when he's on the move and those two tackles shouldn't let anyone get deep in the backfield or contain him. Just my thoughts. If anyone has some insight, please feel free to drop some. Common goal for all of us, right? Aloha!
After looking at it a little more in depth, Oklahoma is the better team on paper and from sideline to sideline have better players. Only thing is Landry Jones sucks! SMH
After looking at it a little more in depth, Oklahoma is the better team on paper and from sideline to sideline have better players. Only thing is Landry Jones sucks! SMH
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.