Hendricks is not #5. Especially based on recent form - he pitched like the 2016 version of himself against the Giants and Padres before the break - he's #2.
Monty has fallen off a bit recently. Chartwood is a disaster, the clear #5. Theo prays he rebounds soon or he'll replace him.
Hendricks is not #5. Especially based on recent form - he pitched like the 2016 version of himself against the Giants and Padres before the break - he's #2.
Monty has fallen off a bit recently. Chartwood is a disaster, the clear #5. Theo prays he rebounds soon or he'll replace him.
Sac- scorp has taken the more contrarian approach these days imo. Some of his sentiments do sound a little far fetched and sarcastic, but he has a pretty good grasp of what’s going on. I have a vision of Martinez and Hendricks both having terrible starts with the game soaring over 10 but wtf do I know
Sac- scorp has taken the more contrarian approach these days imo. Some of his sentiments do sound a little far fetched and sarcastic, but he has a pretty good grasp of what’s going on. I have a vision of Martinez and Hendricks both having terrible starts with the game soaring over 10 but wtf do I know
To get all that DEGENERATE action focused on one game. I'm not a fan of the majority of the public being heavy on one side or on a particular over/under when there's only one game going on. Games like this, I will lay off of. The "fix" comes into play sometimes...
Careful tomorrow. I smell a crossing...
"Schrödinger's bet." A bet that loses when you bet it but wins when you DON'T bet it...
To get all that DEGENERATE action focused on one game. I'm not a fan of the majority of the public being heavy on one side or on a particular over/under when there's only one game going on. Games like this, I will lay off of. The "fix" comes into play sometimes...
Scorpio, using your "Talent vs Hope" theory , you will never bet one dog in baseball. I personally think you or anyone else on this board , or maybe in the world , can't come out ahead over a season betting $ 150 favorites. The only thing worse than betting a $150 fav is to bet a $250 favorite. I think it is a road to disaster . You might cash this one, but you'll have to be a miracle worker to come out ahead in the long run . I still wish you GL on your plays.
Scorpio, using your "Talent vs Hope" theory , you will never bet one dog in baseball. I personally think you or anyone else on this board , or maybe in the world , can't come out ahead over a season betting $ 150 favorites. The only thing worse than betting a $150 fav is to bet a $250 favorite. I think it is a road to disaster . You might cash this one, but you'll have to be a miracle worker to come out ahead in the long run . I still wish you GL on your plays.
Y'all missing the point. It's not about winning and losing, it's about value. You can win 99 out of 100 bets and lose money or win 10 in 100 and profit HUGE. Point is, if hope is where the most value is bet hope. If skill is paying higher than their true odds t o win then bet skill. The goal is not to win the most bets, it's to win the best paying bets you can manage.
I think you exaggerate your point...and I understand it. But you're generalizing way too much here.
Saying it's not about winning and losing is less than accurate. Value is important sure - but not at the cost of blinding yourself to winning and losing. Lots of cappers on here drone on about what a great value they're getting at +150 and then consistently lose 70% of those bets. Betting on the Orioles or Tigers or Padres on the road is crazy - unless you have some inside information.
Risk to $$$ is a better way to state it. For example, betting either on...or against Scherzer at say, -240 is a bad risk either way (even If the Nats were playing well!).
The goal is not to win the best paying bets you can manage. The goal is to make money in a measure commensurate with the minimum you expect for your efforts. Sometimes this is chalk, sometimes dogs, most often a combination. But the key is that everyone's risk tolerance varies - it's an individual thing.
Y'all missing the point. It's not about winning and losing, it's about value. You can win 99 out of 100 bets and lose money or win 10 in 100 and profit HUGE. Point is, if hope is where the most value is bet hope. If skill is paying higher than their true odds t o win then bet skill. The goal is not to win the most bets, it's to win the best paying bets you can manage.
I think you exaggerate your point...and I understand it. But you're generalizing way too much here.
Saying it's not about winning and losing is less than accurate. Value is important sure - but not at the cost of blinding yourself to winning and losing. Lots of cappers on here drone on about what a great value they're getting at +150 and then consistently lose 70% of those bets. Betting on the Orioles or Tigers or Padres on the road is crazy - unless you have some inside information.
Risk to $$$ is a better way to state it. For example, betting either on...or against Scherzer at say, -240 is a bad risk either way (even If the Nats were playing well!).
The goal is not to win the best paying bets you can manage. The goal is to make money in a measure commensurate with the minimum you expect for your efforts. Sometimes this is chalk, sometimes dogs, most often a combination. But the key is that everyone's risk tolerance varies - it's an individual thing.
Scorpio, using your "Talent vs Hope" theory , you will never bet one dog in baseball. I personally think you or anyone else on this board , or maybe in the world , can't come out ahead over a season betting $ 150 favorites. The only thing worse than betting a $150 fav is to bet a $250 favorite. I think it is a road to disaster . You might cash this one, but you'll have to be a miracle worker to come out ahead in the long run . I still wish you GL on your plays.
I mostly bet dogs but you have to bet overs unders dogs and favs.
This is a one game bet on the only game there is,and I think i'm on the side the casino needs today.
Scorpio, using your "Talent vs Hope" theory , you will never bet one dog in baseball. I personally think you or anyone else on this board , or maybe in the world , can't come out ahead over a season betting $ 150 favorites. The only thing worse than betting a $150 fav is to bet a $250 favorite. I think it is a road to disaster . You might cash this one, but you'll have to be a miracle worker to come out ahead in the long run . I still wish you GL on your plays.
I mostly bet dogs but you have to bet overs unders dogs and favs.
This is a one game bet on the only game there is,and I think i'm on the side the casino needs today.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.