The Acela Angle
February 12, 2007 By https://www.vegasinsider.com/handicappers/bios.cfm/hc/197/ed-meyer
VegasInsider.com
The most talked about road trips among NBA handicappers are the trip through the Texas Triangle of Dallas, Houston and San Antonio, the trip through Florida to face the Heat and Magic and the trip through Utah and Denver.
However, perhaps the trip with the most interesting and profitable results involves a trip you can take on the Acela, the high speed train that goes between Boston and New York, with the round trip taking under four hours. The Celtics’ and Knicks’ franchises have a wealth of basketball history and success associated with them. They are in the “club” of past NBA champions. As such, these two have a certain amount of respect for each other. This respect is not manifested when they play each other – the respect is apparent when another team is trying to sweep the storied franchises on the road, back-to-back.
It seems as if New York and Boston have a pact – unspoken or other otherwise – that no team will sweep them consecutively. If a team beats the Knicks in New York, the Celtics go all out to prevent the 2-0, New York – Boston sweep.
Similarly, if a team beats the Celtics in Boston, the Knicks “pick them up” by playing significantly above the linesmakers expectations. This “agreement” has been going on for quite some time.
In fact, the league is 0-9 ATS (-8.4 ppg) since March 6th 1996 in Boston after beating the Knicks in New York. Similarly, the league is 0-10 ATS (-9.2 ppg) since January 20th 1997 in New York after beating the Celtics in Boston!
---
I believe the angle is 20-3 ATS since then. I lost my stat on when the game is played back to back and when played with a rest in between so still take caution. Anyway, if we follow this system the play for tomorrow is none other than the Celtics. Then again, Boston doesn't need much of an angle or crazy train ride to win against the Mavericks. They are crazy 22-3 at home hosting a 14-7 road team. They played pretty close early in the season where Dallas won 89-87 in Dallas.
Following the Acela Angle we got: Boston Celtics -6.5
or if you're feeling it take a dab at the ML.
Goodluck fellas.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
The Acela Angle
February 12, 2007 By https://www.vegasinsider.com/handicappers/bios.cfm/hc/197/ed-meyer
VegasInsider.com
The most talked about road trips among NBA handicappers are the trip through the Texas Triangle of Dallas, Houston and San Antonio, the trip through Florida to face the Heat and Magic and the trip through Utah and Denver.
However, perhaps the trip with the most interesting and profitable results involves a trip you can take on the Acela, the high speed train that goes between Boston and New York, with the round trip taking under four hours. The Celtics’ and Knicks’ franchises have a wealth of basketball history and success associated with them. They are in the “club” of past NBA champions. As such, these two have a certain amount of respect for each other. This respect is not manifested when they play each other – the respect is apparent when another team is trying to sweep the storied franchises on the road, back-to-back.
It seems as if New York and Boston have a pact – unspoken or other otherwise – that no team will sweep them consecutively. If a team beats the Knicks in New York, the Celtics go all out to prevent the 2-0, New York – Boston sweep.
Similarly, if a team beats the Celtics in Boston, the Knicks “pick them up” by playing significantly above the linesmakers expectations. This “agreement” has been going on for quite some time.
In fact, the league is 0-9 ATS (-8.4 ppg) since March 6th 1996 in Boston after beating the Knicks in New York. Similarly, the league is 0-10 ATS (-9.2 ppg) since January 20th 1997 in New York after beating the Celtics in Boston!
---
I believe the angle is 20-3 ATS since then. I lost my stat on when the game is played back to back and when played with a rest in between so still take caution. Anyway, if we follow this system the play for tomorrow is none other than the Celtics. Then again, Boston doesn't need much of an angle or crazy train ride to win against the Mavericks. They are crazy 22-3 at home hosting a 14-7 road team. They played pretty close early in the season where Dallas won 89-87 in Dallas.
Following the Acela Angle we got: Boston Celtics -6.5
It's like those crazy trends, where a team goes 10-0 ATS on mondays or smth. like that, probably happens quite often in a league with so many games. Where is just no reasonable connection.
but BOL
0
Interesting, but meaningless.
It's like those crazy trends, where a team goes 10-0 ATS on mondays or smth. like that, probably happens quite often in a league with so many games. Where is just no reasonable connection.
It's like those crazy trends, where a team goes 10-0 ATS on mondays or smth. like that, probably happens quite often in a league with so many games. Where is just no reasonable connection.
but BOL
Agreed.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fiire:
Interesting, but meaningless.
It's like those crazy trends, where a team goes 10-0 ATS on mondays or smth. like that, probably happens quite often in a league with so many games. Where is just no reasonable connection.
cmm, correct me if i'm wrong...but i think the acela angle only applies to b2b road games.. dallas played at new york yesterday, got some rest today and will play atboston tomorrow..
the lakers @ bos,then nyk the next day is a sure thing, though.
0
cmm, correct me if i'm wrong...but i think the acela angle only applies to b2b road games.. dallas played at new york yesterday, got some rest today and will play atboston tomorrow..
the lakers @ bos,then nyk the next day is a sure thing, though.
cmm, correct me if i'm wrong...but i think the acela angle only applies to b2b road games.. dallas played at new york yesterday, got some rest today and will play atboston tomorrow..
the lakers @ bos,then nyk the next day is a sure thing, though.
Nope. Some of the samples made by the website has a day of rest in between. The angle is in effect as long as the road team is playing Boston or New York back to back, not necessarily back to back games.
Acela Trips 2007-08
Team
Game 1
Game 2
Denver
Nov. 6 vs. New York (WIN)
Nov. 7 vs. Boston (LOSS)
Golden State
Nov. 20 vs. New York (WIN)
Nov. 21 vs. Boston (LOSS)
Washington
Jan. 14 vs. Boston (WIN)
Jan. 15 vs. New York (LOSS)
LA Clippers
Feb. 4 vs. New York (WIN)
Feb. 6 vs. Boston (LOSS)
San Antonio
Feb. 8 vs. New York (WIN)
Feb. 10 vs. Boston (LOSS)
Bobcats
Feb. 27 vs. New York (LOSS)
Feb. 29 vs. Boston (NO PLAY)
Pistons
Mar. 5 vs. Boston (LOSS)
Mar. 7 vs. New York (NO PLAY)
0
Quote Originally Posted by b00ger:
cmm, correct me if i'm wrong...but i think the acela angle only applies to b2b road games.. dallas played at new york yesterday, got some rest today and will play atboston tomorrow..
the lakers @ bos,then nyk the next day is a sure thing, though.
Nope. Some of the samples made by the website has a day of rest in between. The angle is in effect as long as the road team is playing Boston or New York back to back, not necessarily back to back games.
Very risky play because Dallas is a very good road team, and Boston just came back from a very long road trip, so they could have a let-down in their 1st home game back, as they traveled 3,000 miles from California to Boston just the other day.
0
Very risky play because Dallas is a very good road team, and Boston just came back from a very long road trip, so they could have a let-down in their 1st home game back, as they traveled 3,000 miles from California to Boston just the other day.
@ SMart Bets: Was the one loss last year?I actually waited for the "Acela angle" last year and it seemed like a perfect situation & it actually lost. Atl had defeated the knicks in blowout fashion and were +9.5 vs. Boston 2days later- Atl won that game SU..
0
@ SMart Bets: Was the one loss last year?I actually waited for the "Acela angle" last year and it seemed like a perfect situation & it actually lost. Atl had defeated the knicks in blowout fashion and were +9.5 vs. Boston 2days later- Atl won that game SU..
Yes I've read about this Acela triangle trend several years back from some place I can't remember exactly where but it did lose that game and I lost my bet, if my memory serves me well. Besides from that angle, I'm still on Boston as it looks to be a good play.
-888
0
Yes I've read about this Acela triangle trend several years back from some place I can't remember exactly where but it did lose that game and I lost my bet, if my memory serves me well. Besides from that angle, I'm still on Boston as it looks to be a good play.
if anyone has the stats correct me if I am wrong, but I am showing 23-1 ATS here since '96
I've got 22 - 1, not sure whether that's correct or not. It was 19 - 0 up until the end of the 07/08 season, that's what the article says right? The only loss i can see after that is Atlanta being able to do it very early on last season. The 3 W's since then were Utah and Denver last year, then Golden State in 08/09. All three got belted in the 2nd leg after winning the first. Which one am i missing?
0
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:
if anyone has the stats correct me if I am wrong, but I am showing 23-1 ATS here since '96
I've got 22 - 1, not sure whether that's correct or not. It was 19 - 0 up until the end of the 07/08 season, that's what the article says right? The only loss i can see after that is Atlanta being able to do it very early on last season. The 3 W's since then were Utah and Denver last year, then Golden State in 08/09. All three got belted in the 2nd leg after winning the first. Which one am i missing?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.