I dont gamble just to gamble. I would NEVER lay -1000 on a bet. I dont do 8 team morning lines plays either to get even money. I rarely if ever will lay over -130 on any bet.
I am not even saying +14 is a bad play.
But, to even think Tampa ML has value is a good play or has value is a joke. You people start these threads every fricken week.
We get it, GB will "probably" lose 1 game this year atleast. But, you dont have to start thread after thread week after week saying how "This is the week". Just let it happen.
Like I said, if or when they finally do lose, even the people whohave the teams ML will still BE DOWN boatloads already have been betting against them for 4+ weeks now.
I dont gamble just to gamble. I would NEVER lay -1000 on a bet. I dont do 8 team morning lines plays either to get even money. I rarely if ever will lay over -130 on any bet.
I am not even saying +14 is a bad play.
But, to even think Tampa ML has value is a good play or has value is a joke. You people start these threads every fricken week.
We get it, GB will "probably" lose 1 game this year atleast. But, you dont have to start thread after thread week after week saying how "This is the week". Just let it happen.
Like I said, if or when they finally do lose, even the people whohave the teams ML will still BE DOWN boatloads already have been betting against them for 4+ weeks now.
You should never question anyone's or even use the term "capping skills" again !!
You should never question anyone's or even use the term "capping skills" again !!
Matt Flynn would start on atleast 10 other teams right now today if GB let him go. He is also VERY good and VERY unknown
It might sound funny and people might not believe it, but he has the "identical" skills as Rodgers, just not as polished.
Matt Flynn would start on atleast 10 other teams right now today if GB let him go. He is also VERY good and VERY unknown
It might sound funny and people might not believe it, but he has the "identical" skills as Rodgers, just not as polished.
Whats the "rare situation"???
Whats the "rare situation"???
I dont understand your mentality here. GB will lose this game cuz they wanna beat Detroit and wrap up a wild card spot? Hahaha How bout if they win today and then beat Detroit as well...isnt that making it harder for Detroit to win the division. Keep on whoring and losing....but gl with that bud
I dont understand your mentality here. GB will lose this game cuz they wanna beat Detroit and wrap up a wild card spot? Hahaha How bout if they win today and then beat Detroit as well...isnt that making it harder for Detroit to win the division. Keep on whoring and losing....but gl with that bud
Very nice, thanks for sharing
Very nice, thanks for sharing
GW,
As stated previously, the difference in this game and the NO/SL game was that it was a road game for NO. The same situation has happened at least two other times this year that I know of: Baltimore beating Pittsburgh and then losing on the ROAD to a lesser team and the Jets losing to to NE and then losing AT Denver. These games were "sandwich games" between division games. Once again though, they were road games. Think about this; Tampa has lost to Detroit and Chicago and had to come from double digits down against the Vikings. The Bucs haven't done very well against NFC North teams this season.
GW,
As stated previously, the difference in this game and the NO/SL game was that it was a road game for NO. The same situation has happened at least two other times this year that I know of: Baltimore beating Pittsburgh and then losing on the ROAD to a lesser team and the Jets losing to to NE and then losing AT Denver. These games were "sandwich games" between division games. Once again though, they were road games. Think about this; Tampa has lost to Detroit and Chicago and had to come from double digits down against the Vikings. The Bucs haven't done very well against NFC North teams this season.
GambleWhore-
People aren't laughing at you just because you are taking the Bucs ML. It's your reason for taking it- You keep saying they don't want to risk injury by playing hard against the Bucs. They will be playing so why wouldn't they play hard? If they were worried about injuries they just wouldn't play. They want to win the division and get home field advantage in the playoffs. In order to do this, they want to win every game. They will be playing their ass off today especially in the first half so that maybe they can rest some starters in the 4th quarter. So for that reason Tampa Bay may get a backdoor cover. To bet the ML is just dumb. Your best chance for a ML victory against the Packers will come by betting a good team when Green Bay is on the road. Not by betting a terrible defensive team in the Packers backyard. If you really value your money take the points-
GambleWhore-
People aren't laughing at you just because you are taking the Bucs ML. It's your reason for taking it- You keep saying they don't want to risk injury by playing hard against the Bucs. They will be playing so why wouldn't they play hard? If they were worried about injuries they just wouldn't play. They want to win the division and get home field advantage in the playoffs. In order to do this, they want to win every game. They will be playing their ass off today especially in the first half so that maybe they can rest some starters in the 4th quarter. So for that reason Tampa Bay may get a backdoor cover. To bet the ML is just dumb. Your best chance for a ML victory against the Packers will come by betting a good team when Green Bay is on the road. Not by betting a terrible defensive team in the Packers backyard. If you really value your money take the points-
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.