this is my follow up:week1 went 4-1(chic,jac,was,mia-win///stl loses) week2: 6-0(tenn,car,indy,s.f.,mia.,atl-win) week3: 7-1(minn,buff,cleve,oak,chic,sea,indy-win///stl loses) week4: 7-0(jac,cin,k.c.,stl.,sea,ari,oak-win) week5: 5-0(car,buff,jac,den,atl-win) week6::only 2 homedogs so NO PLAY. week7: 6-0(nyj,t.b.,mia,ari,min,jac-win)......before i go on you will have to overlook the terrible way i wrote this.....anyways...............total is: 35-2 (only 2 loses came with STLOUIS)..........i have made very good off this so far this year and hope you have also! I AM NOT SAYING BET THE HOUSE ON THIS! I just wanted to share this with the forum and hope this helps us all make money (if you make LARGE payout dont forget me, LOL) gl all
You are correct. I had marked a game as a loss that was actually a win.
this is my follow up:week1 went 4-1(chic,jac,was,mia-win///stl loses) week2: 6-0(tenn,car,indy,s.f.,mia.,atl-win) week3: 7-1(minn,buff,cleve,oak,chic,sea,indy-win///stl loses) week4: 7-0(jac,cin,k.c.,stl.,sea,ari,oak-win) week5: 5-0(car,buff,jac,den,atl-win) week6::only 2 homedogs so NO PLAY. week7: 6-0(nyj,t.b.,mia,ari,min,jac-win)......before i go on you will have to overlook the terrible way i wrote this.....anyways...............total is: 35-2 (only 2 loses came with STLOUIS)..........i have made very good off this so far this year and hope you have also! I AM NOT SAYING BET THE HOUSE ON THIS! I just wanted to share this with the forum and hope this helps us all make money (if you make LARGE payout dont forget me, LOL) gl all
You are correct. I had marked a game as a loss that was actually a win.
I would not stay away from St. Louis simply because they don't win within the parameters of this system.
They are 0-6 ATS this year and gaining value with each ATS loss. You will be getting a lot of value with the rams as a 23.5 point home dog to a team who just won in a primetime blowout. I'll be very surpised to see them lose by 4 scores in this one.
I would not stay away from St. Louis simply because they don't win within the parameters of this system.
They are 0-6 ATS this year and gaining value with each ATS loss. You will be getting a lot of value with the rams as a 23.5 point home dog to a team who just won in a primetime blowout. I'll be very surpised to see them lose by 4 scores in this one.
I would not stay away from St. Louis simply because they don't win within the parameters of this system.
They are 0-6 ATS this year and gaining value with each ATS loss. You will be getting a lot of value with the rams as a 23.5 point home dog to a team who just won in a primetime blowout. I'll be very surpised to see them lose by 4 scores in this one.
That's not how this one works though. The value increase is solely from making the bet a 5-teamer instead of a 4-teamer (on in this case, a round robin of 3-teamer). There is no ML value attributed in the teaser play.
I would not stay away from St. Louis simply because they don't win within the parameters of this system.
They are 0-6 ATS this year and gaining value with each ATS loss. You will be getting a lot of value with the rams as a 23.5 point home dog to a team who just won in a primetime blowout. I'll be very surpised to see them lose by 4 scores in this one.
That's not how this one works though. The value increase is solely from making the bet a 5-teamer instead of a 4-teamer (on in this case, a round robin of 3-teamer). There is no ML value attributed in the teaser play.
I would not stay away from St. Louis simply because they don't win within the parameters of this system.
They are 0-6 ATS this year and gaining value with each ATS loss. You will be getting a lot of value with the rams as a 23.5 point home dog to a team who just won in a primetime blowout. I'll be very surpised to see them lose by 4 scores in this one.
My Spidey senses tell me to stay away from any team that makes up the entire loss column in a stat. I need not look any further.
With that said, STL averages, what, 9 PPG? NO has absolutely no issue running up the board as we saw last week, and can very, very easily do it again this week against STL. And I'd have to say that IND is the better team over STL, so this one could be equally as ugly.
I would not stay away from St. Louis simply because they don't win within the parameters of this system.
They are 0-6 ATS this year and gaining value with each ATS loss. You will be getting a lot of value with the rams as a 23.5 point home dog to a team who just won in a primetime blowout. I'll be very surpised to see them lose by 4 scores in this one.
My Spidey senses tell me to stay away from any team that makes up the entire loss column in a stat. I need not look any further.
With that said, STL averages, what, 9 PPG? NO has absolutely no issue running up the board as we saw last week, and can very, very easily do it again this week against STL. And I'd have to say that IND is the better team over STL, so this one could be equally as ugly.
gl romero........and yes take it slow to start with till you build bankroll and then only increase slightly because this could turn at any moment.........or keep hitting!(I HOPE!)
gl romero........and yes take it slow to start with till you build bankroll and then only increase slightly because this could turn at any moment.........or keep hitting!(I HOPE!)
You are correct. I had marked a game as a loss that was actually a win.
35-2 is what I have now, too.
[/Quote thank you for rechecking my numbers.....i can make mistake....of course last 1 i made was in 1972....(LOL) no it is much more than that.....anyways i am still staying away from STLOUIS(it may be a winner) but just cant pick them.gl in your picks
You are correct. I had marked a game as a loss that was actually a win.
35-2 is what I have now, too.
[/Quote thank you for rechecking my numbers.....i can make mistake....of course last 1 i made was in 1972....(LOL) no it is much more than that.....anyways i am still staying away from STLOUIS(it may be a winner) but just cant pick them.gl in your picks
daysbtwin....thanks for input into conversation but i will have to stay with system as it is, just because of the fact(as Marcus stated) the only 2 losses came from STLOUIS.....however you decide....gl
daysbtwin....thanks for input into conversation but i will have to stay with system as it is, just because of the fact(as Marcus stated) the only 2 losses came from STLOUIS.....however you decide....gl
saki....i use covers....just go to scores and you will see little box near top left.......you can click on arrow to change from week to week and i think past 5 or 6 years......just remember start slow to test this system because it may continue and may not(just a friendly piece of advice) your option........hope this helps.....gl
saki....i use covers....just go to scores and you will see little box near top left.......you can click on arrow to change from week to week and i think past 5 or 6 years......just remember start slow to test this system because it may continue and may not(just a friendly piece of advice) your option........hope this helps.....gl
Goodfella....thanks, hope we continue hitting and just go easy to start........got to play smart.......still quite a few weeks left so you have time to slightly increase each week (remember money management is the key to this) gl this week
Goodfella....thanks, hope we continue hitting and just go easy to start........got to play smart.......still quite a few weeks left so you have time to slightly increase each week (remember money management is the key to this) gl this week
jsut additional info on college football(i know different forum) top 5 ranked teams (NO PLAY if: they play each other.....NO PLAY if: they play AA teams)........if you had taken them starting week 1 to present day.......22 wins-8 losses (ats) I have a breakdown of this in college football forum.....try it or dont try it......your option gl
jsut additional info on college football(i know different forum) top 5 ranked teams (NO PLAY if: they play each other.....NO PLAY if: they play AA teams)........if you had taken them starting week 1 to present day.......22 wins-8 losses (ats) I have a breakdown of this in college football forum.....try it or dont try it......your option gl
appreciate it RG...i'll probably play all of the three underdog home games (taking out st. louis) all for one unit....i believe this turns out to be 4 games total...gl all
appreciate it RG...i'll probably play all of the three underdog home games (taking out st. louis) all for one unit....i believe this turns out to be 4 games total...gl all
just wondering RG....do you always Round Robin the games? I see for this week you have 4 different combinations....do you do this every week or do you just do straight up teasers with all games on one card? and if so what do you find more profitable
just wondering RG....do you always Round Robin the games? I see for this week you have 4 different combinations....do you do this every week or do you just do straight up teasers with all games on one card? and if so what do you find more profitable
Gooodfella......i have been going with the different combinations each week.....which can be many picks especially like week 4 when there was 7 teams that fit this system......and the risk is if 1 or 2 teams lose(with that many) then it can be several losers.....thats why i started small but have slightly increased as i won and if there are many teams that fit for the week (such as 5,6,or 7 teams) then i have lowered my limit on that week......with that way of picking i minimize my lose/win but i wont get hammered for that week if this goes bad......hope this helps......gl
Gooodfella......i have been going with the different combinations each week.....which can be many picks especially like week 4 when there was 7 teams that fit this system......and the risk is if 1 or 2 teams lose(with that many) then it can be several losers.....thats why i started small but have slightly increased as i won and if there are many teams that fit for the week (such as 5,6,or 7 teams) then i have lowered my limit on that week......with that way of picking i minimize my lose/win but i wont get hammered for that week if this goes bad......hope this helps......gl
kevin....that question is in regards to COLLEGE FOOTBALL(just letting readers know )i call them AA teams......these are the teams that are(i have no better word for it)nobodys.........if you go to covers.com college football scores......the (sorry for the word)nobodys is in dark black bold letters and has the line but no total....for reference look back at week 1 (the top 2 games is a good example........Murray State and Villanova are ...AA teams).......hope this explains it well enough if not let me know.......gl
kevin....that question is in regards to COLLEGE FOOTBALL(just letting readers know )i call them AA teams......these are the teams that are(i have no better word for it)nobodys.........if you go to covers.com college football scores......the (sorry for the word)nobodys is in dark black bold letters and has the line but no total....for reference look back at week 1 (the top 2 games is a good example........Murray State and Villanova are ...AA teams).......hope this explains it well enough if not let me know.......gl
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.