You should never trust any info that comes from govt endorsed/funded so called science
Who in their right minds would put that crap in their body?
Yeah, it's depressing alright. It's always depressing to me when a man's put to death based on the testimony of a jailhouse snitch who later wanted to recant his story, a supposed unsavory character, faulty outdated forensic evidence & the fact he didn't do what others thought he should have, but with no motive whatsoever. And then when new evidence comes to light from noted fire scientists, the governor doesn't even give a 30 day stay of execution for it at least to be looked into further & after he's executed & a commission is disbanded by Perry 2 days before the scientist is to give testimony. Yeah, that's depressing - haven't lived in TX for quite awhile but this story caught my attention & I read up on it. Stinks bad on all fronts -
Yeah, it's depressing alright. It's always depressing to me when a man's put to death based on the testimony of a jailhouse snitch who later wanted to recant his story, a supposed unsavory character, faulty outdated forensic evidence & the fact he didn't do what others thought he should have, but with no motive whatsoever. And then when new evidence comes to light from noted fire scientists, the governor doesn't even give a 30 day stay of execution for it at least to be looked into further & after he's executed & a commission is disbanded by Perry 2 days before the scientist is to give testimony. Yeah, that's depressing - haven't lived in TX for quite awhile but this story caught my attention & I read up on it. Stinks bad on all fronts -
More significantly, however, Bachmann’s claims about the vaccine’s consequences are flat-out incorrect, and so dramatically so that the American Academy of Pediatrics released a statement refuting Bachmann’s claims, stating that “There is absolutely no scientific validity to this statement” and that the “life-saving vaccine that can protect girls from cervical cancer” has an “excellent safety record.”
It’s practically expected that presidential candidates will make
extravagant claims during campaign season, but this crosses the line
from exaggerated to outright dangerous.
This kind of incendiary, fear-mongering rhetoric is not only a
dishonest campaigning strategy but outright harms the public. Bachmann
told the Today Show that people have to draw their own conclusions about
the safety of the vaccine. But when this kind of blatant misinformation
is running rampant, it makes it significantly more difficult for
parents to make informed decisions about the vaccinations that their
children should receive.
Furthermore, after being faced with the reality of the vaccine, that it’s just as safe as any other vaccine out there, she refused to correct her statements.
"I didn't make any statements that would indicate I'm a doctor, I'm a scientist, or making any conclusions about the drug one way or the other,” she said during a campaign stop in San Francisco, The Huffington Post reported.
That’s right: because she didn’t claim to be a medical professional, she can say whatever she likes about a vaccine and assume that people know that she has no grounds for the claims she’s making.
This kind of rhetoric has to stop. It’s harmful not only to the political process but to the public as well.
More significantly, however, Bachmann’s claims about the vaccine’s consequences are flat-out incorrect, and so dramatically so that the American Academy of Pediatrics released a statement refuting Bachmann’s claims, stating that “There is absolutely no scientific validity to this statement” and that the “life-saving vaccine that can protect girls from cervical cancer” has an “excellent safety record.”
It’s practically expected that presidential candidates will make
extravagant claims during campaign season, but this crosses the line
from exaggerated to outright dangerous.
This kind of incendiary, fear-mongering rhetoric is not only a
dishonest campaigning strategy but outright harms the public. Bachmann
told the Today Show that people have to draw their own conclusions about
the safety of the vaccine. But when this kind of blatant misinformation
is running rampant, it makes it significantly more difficult for
parents to make informed decisions about the vaccinations that their
children should receive.
Furthermore, after being faced with the reality of the vaccine, that it’s just as safe as any other vaccine out there, she refused to correct her statements.
"I didn't make any statements that would indicate I'm a doctor, I'm a scientist, or making any conclusions about the drug one way or the other,” she said during a campaign stop in San Francisco, The Huffington Post reported.
That’s right: because she didn’t claim to be a medical professional, she can say whatever she likes about a vaccine and assume that people know that she has no grounds for the claims she’s making.
This kind of rhetoric has to stop. It’s harmful not only to the political process but to the public as well.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.