@Jimmy Can't argue with that. You're right but that's really why I bet the BCS winner...a slight longshot type bet...or any future "to win" type. Had Grizzlies, Pacers, Red Wings, Sharks, Seahawks this past seasons...don't regret any one of them. Have Houston pre-Howard at 25/1, Seahawks 12/1, Red Sox 30/1, Michigan State BB, Kansas BB for current or upcoming seasons. It's throwing darts and IMO that's why I only do one or two and they're usually slight longshots. GL this year Jimmy, looking forward to your SEC expertise!!!!
@Jimmy Can't argue with that. You're right but that's really why I bet the BCS winner...a slight longshot type bet...or any future "to win" type. Had Grizzlies, Pacers, Red Wings, Sharks, Seahawks this past seasons...don't regret any one of them. Have Houston pre-Howard at 25/1, Seahawks 12/1, Red Sox 30/1, Michigan State BB, Kansas BB for current or upcoming seasons. It's throwing darts and IMO that's why I only do one or two and they're usually slight longshots. GL this year Jimmy, looking forward to your SEC expertise!!!!
@Jimmy Can't argue with that. You're right but that's really why I bet the BCS winner...a slight longshot type bet...or any future "to win" type. Had Grizzlies, Pacers, Red Wings, Sharks, Seahawks this past seasons...don't regret any one of them. Have Houston pre-Howard at 25/1, Seahawks 12/1, Red Sox 30/1, Michigan State BB, Kansas BB for current or upcoming seasons. It's throwing darts and IMO that's why I only do one or two and they're usually slight longshots. GL this year Jimmy, looking forward to your SEC expertise!!!!
I understand betting a long shot, I'm just saying to bet one that has a legitimate shot. There are other teams that have rosters full of talent that can compete at the national championship level. Teams like Florida State, Clemson, Florida, South Carolina maybe even Texas are some dark horses that have reasonable shots of winning it all.
Stanford is slow and they have very few athletes. They win with great coaching, and by beating people up in the trenches. The problem is once they have to play a team that is superior in the trenches and has superior athletes, they have zero shot of competing. For God's sake, Stanford struggles with the Washington and Washington State's of the world. For Stanford to compete they would have to have a special talent playing QB like an Andrew Luck, Tim Tebow, Cam Newton, RG III or Michael Vick.
If Stanford did make it to the title game, their likely opponent would be Alabama (or some other SEC jauggernaut), and that would be a worse beatdown than the Notre Dame game.
@Jimmy Can't argue with that. You're right but that's really why I bet the BCS winner...a slight longshot type bet...or any future "to win" type. Had Grizzlies, Pacers, Red Wings, Sharks, Seahawks this past seasons...don't regret any one of them. Have Houston pre-Howard at 25/1, Seahawks 12/1, Red Sox 30/1, Michigan State BB, Kansas BB for current or upcoming seasons. It's throwing darts and IMO that's why I only do one or two and they're usually slight longshots. GL this year Jimmy, looking forward to your SEC expertise!!!!
I understand betting a long shot, I'm just saying to bet one that has a legitimate shot. There are other teams that have rosters full of talent that can compete at the national championship level. Teams like Florida State, Clemson, Florida, South Carolina maybe even Texas are some dark horses that have reasonable shots of winning it all.
Stanford is slow and they have very few athletes. They win with great coaching, and by beating people up in the trenches. The problem is once they have to play a team that is superior in the trenches and has superior athletes, they have zero shot of competing. For God's sake, Stanford struggles with the Washington and Washington State's of the world. For Stanford to compete they would have to have a special talent playing QB like an Andrew Luck, Tim Tebow, Cam Newton, RG III or Michael Vick.
If Stanford did make it to the title game, their likely opponent would be Alabama (or some other SEC jauggernaut), and that would be a worse beatdown than the Notre Dame game.
I understand betting a long shot, I'm just saying to bet one that has a legitimate shot. There are other teams that have rosters full of talent that can compete at the national championship level. Teams like Florida State, Clemson, Florida, South Carolina maybe even Texas are some dark horses that have reasonable shots of winning it all.
Stanford is slow and they have very few athletes. They win with great coaching, and by beating people up in the trenches. The problem is once they have to play a team that is superior in the trenches and has superior athletes, they have zero shot of competing. For God's sake, Stanford struggles with the Washington and Washington State's of the world. For Stanford to compete they would have to have a special talent playing QB like an Andrew Luck, Tim Tebow, Cam Newton, RG III or Michael Vick.
If Stanford did make it to the title game, their likely opponent would be Alabama (or some other SEC jauggernaut), and that would be a worse beatdown than the Notre Dame game.
I've got Bama to win BCS, but I agree with Kahuna in that at that price , I had to take a shot at it with a token wager.
Helping Kama'aina to beat their " Local " since 1994.
I understand betting a long shot, I'm just saying to bet one that has a legitimate shot. There are other teams that have rosters full of talent that can compete at the national championship level. Teams like Florida State, Clemson, Florida, South Carolina maybe even Texas are some dark horses that have reasonable shots of winning it all.
Stanford is slow and they have very few athletes. They win with great coaching, and by beating people up in the trenches. The problem is once they have to play a team that is superior in the trenches and has superior athletes, they have zero shot of competing. For God's sake, Stanford struggles with the Washington and Washington State's of the world. For Stanford to compete they would have to have a special talent playing QB like an Andrew Luck, Tim Tebow, Cam Newton, RG III or Michael Vick.
If Stanford did make it to the title game, their likely opponent would be Alabama (or some other SEC jauggernaut), and that would be a worse beatdown than the Notre Dame game.
I've got Bama to win BCS, but I agree with Kahuna in that at that price , I had to take a shot at it with a token wager.
@jimmy Yup. Very well aware of those things. Will eventually also add one of those teams that u mentioned as well. Last year I Bama along with a PAC-12 team that I don't want to mention...ugh embarrassing...probably do the same here one from either the SEC or ACC. Who knows.
@jimmy Yup. Very well aware of those things. Will eventually also add one of those teams that u mentioned as well. Last year I Bama along with a PAC-12 team that I don't want to mention...ugh embarrassing...probably do the same here one from either the SEC or ACC. Who knows.
Itching to add either Ohio State or Texas to the BCS win future. I can just see it now...media hyping up Meyer in the playoff format. As much as I'd like to back Texas, I still have some major doubt in the QBs. Every year we hear about Texas and their QB preseason and they disappoint. I'll make a decision soon...lol. Not like anyone is desperately awaiting my choice...haha
Itching to add either Ohio State or Texas to the BCS win future. I can just see it now...media hyping up Meyer in the playoff format. As much as I'd like to back Texas, I still have some major doubt in the QBs. Every year we hear about Texas and their QB preseason and they disappoint. I'll make a decision soon...lol. Not like anyone is desperately awaiting my choice...haha
Just got my local listing of RSW bets. At first glance I like Michigan over 8.5 (+140), and AZState over 7.5 (-140). Nothing locked but discussion if u see something I dont.
Just got my local listing of RSW bets. At first glance I like Michigan over 8.5 (+140), and AZState over 7.5 (-140). Nothing locked but discussion if u see something I dont.
Adding... Ohio State -10 vs. Wisky .5u @ -115 LSU -3 vs. TexAM .5u @-120
When I play GOY games I usually just play a small card with games I feel the lines will be way different come game time. Wisky will be playing @AZState (possible loss), back home for Purdue (improved team), then back on roaf to Ohio State. If they lose one of those games before Ohio State, line might be a bit higher with Ohio State breezing thru their schedule at time With Buff, SDSU, Cal, and Florida AM.
Not quite the same situation with LSU. LSU will be at home after playing Bama prior week (bad spot?). I just feel like Manziels success last year is really drawing the public away from going against them. He will be without 2 highly touted/drafted OT...big loss...against a defense that could arguably be the best in the SEC (rep anyway).
Only one other im eyeing up: BC pk vs. Wake Forest. Still looking into it.
Adding... Ohio State -10 vs. Wisky .5u @ -115 LSU -3 vs. TexAM .5u @-120
When I play GOY games I usually just play a small card with games I feel the lines will be way different come game time. Wisky will be playing @AZState (possible loss), back home for Purdue (improved team), then back on roaf to Ohio State. If they lose one of those games before Ohio State, line might be a bit higher with Ohio State breezing thru their schedule at time With Buff, SDSU, Cal, and Florida AM.
Not quite the same situation with LSU. LSU will be at home after playing Bama prior week (bad spot?). I just feel like Manziels success last year is really drawing the public away from going against them. He will be without 2 highly touted/drafted OT...big loss...against a defense that could arguably be the best in the SEC (rep anyway).
Only one other im eyeing up: BC pk vs. Wake Forest. Still looking into it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.