Also just a thought. As boring as the Texans offense was last week, they did come with-in one possession of covering the spread. Ravens have a much more prolific offense then Texans. I don't think this is a hard one.
Texans 416 points...
Ravens 398 points.....
Clueless Clown.....
Stats are for squares. Thats why there is so many, so many categories and most importantly they are made so readily available to the public squares like yourself. Im sure Denver had more points scored in the regular season then the Ravens and how did that work out? You probably had Denver.
Texans 416 points...
Ravens 398 points.....
Clueless Clown.....
Stats are for squares. Thats why there is so many, so many categories and most importantly they are made so readily available to the public squares like yourself. Im sure Denver had more points scored in the regular season then the Ravens and how did that work out? You probably had Denver.
That will be like saying, if NE goes up 7-0, all they have to do is a FG better scoring-wise than Hou to cover.
That will be like saying, if NE goes up 7-0, all they have to do is a FG better scoring-wise than Hou to cover.
That will be like saying, if NE goes up 7-0, all they have to do is a FG better scoring-wise than Hou to cover.
But the question is If the Ravens go up first 7-0. Thats what this thread is about. Also SF was up 4 tds when the Pats came back. SF lost intensity and played soft after such a big lead. I think you would have an argument if the Pats were leading by 28 points in that game.
Ravens can also score in a hurry. More importantly and its the obvious bait. -9 spread asking for action on the Pats. A bait spread covers very seldom. The Pats did it last week. Can they do it 2 weeks in a row? If i was betting the Pats I'd feel better if the line was -10.5
That will be like saying, if NE goes up 7-0, all they have to do is a FG better scoring-wise than Hou to cover.
But the question is If the Ravens go up first 7-0. Thats what this thread is about. Also SF was up 4 tds when the Pats came back. SF lost intensity and played soft after such a big lead. I think you would have an argument if the Pats were leading by 28 points in that game.
Ravens can also score in a hurry. More importantly and its the obvious bait. -9 spread asking for action on the Pats. A bait spread covers very seldom. The Pats did it last week. Can they do it 2 weeks in a row? If i was betting the Pats I'd feel better if the line was -10.5
But the question is If the Ravens go up first 7-0. Thats what this thread is about. Also SF was up 4 tds when the Pats came back. SF lost intensity and played soft after such a big lead. I think you would have an argument if the Pats were leading by 28 points in that game.
Ravens can also score in a hurry. More importantly and its the obvious bait. -9 spread asking for action on the Pats. A bait spread covers very seldom. The Pats did it last week. Can they do it 2 weeks in a row? If i was betting the Pats I'd feel better if the line was -10.5
But the question is If the Ravens go up first 7-0. Thats what this thread is about. Also SF was up 4 tds when the Pats came back. SF lost intensity and played soft after such a big lead. I think you would have an argument if the Pats were leading by 28 points in that game.
Ravens can also score in a hurry. More importantly and its the obvious bait. -9 spread asking for action on the Pats. A bait spread covers very seldom. The Pats did it last week. Can they do it 2 weeks in a row? If i was betting the Pats I'd feel better if the line was -10.5
But the question is If the Ravens go up first 7-0. Thats what this thread is about. Also SF was up 4 tds when the Pats came back. SF lost intensity and played soft after such a big lead. I think you would have an argument if the Pats were leading by 28 points in that game.
Ravens can also score in a hurry. More importantly and its the obvious bait. -9 spread asking for action on the Pats. A bait spread covers very seldom. The Pats did it last week. Can they do it 2 weeks in a row? If i was betting the Pats I'd feel better if the line was -10.5
But the question is If the Ravens go up first 7-0. Thats what this thread is about. Also SF was up 4 tds when the Pats came back. SF lost intensity and played soft after such a big lead. I think you would have an argument if the Pats were leading by 28 points in that game.
Ravens can also score in a hurry. More importantly and its the obvious bait. -9 spread asking for action on the Pats. A bait spread covers very seldom. The Pats did it last week. Can they do it 2 weeks in a row? If i was betting the Pats I'd feel better if the line was -10.5
But the question is If the Ravens go up first 7-0. Thats what this thread is about. Also SF was up 4 tds when the Pats came back. SF lost intensity and played soft after such a big lead. I think you would have an argument if the Pats were leading by 28 points in that game.
Ravens can also score in a hurry. More importantly and its the obvious bait. -9 spread asking for action on the Pats. A bait spread covers very seldom. The Pats did it last week. Can they do it 2 weeks in a row? If i was betting the Pats I'd feel better if the line was -10.5
Based on these two teams, I don't think it's an obvious bait at all. They will have plently of action at 9 on Bal.
But the question is If the Ravens go up first 7-0. Thats what this thread is about. Also SF was up 4 tds when the Pats came back. SF lost intensity and played soft after such a big lead. I think you would have an argument if the Pats were leading by 28 points in that game.
Ravens can also score in a hurry. More importantly and its the obvious bait. -9 spread asking for action on the Pats. A bait spread covers very seldom. The Pats did it last week. Can they do it 2 weeks in a row? If i was betting the Pats I'd feel better if the line was -10.5
Based on these two teams, I don't think it's an obvious bait at all. They will have plently of action at 9 on Bal.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.