hey quick question cali, could you elaborate on "3. 2H bet" ? i dont quite understand slam and over (double it) etc..
for 4, which team would you give the "sucker bet" to? dogs are winning by dd so you would bet on the dogs or the favorites?
for the totals you would always under the lowest # and over the highest #?
thanks for answering bro!
1/yeah , its very classic 2H bet : yesterday was 2 games for the example : CHAR/ DET : 1H : way over 59-60 . and 2H : o/u = 98 . IF you bet the game $100 = UNDER . then you saw you already lost on the UNDER . then 2H : you gotta double the bet $200 on the UNDER . In the end , you won back $200 on under 2H -$100 lost on under game = $100 won .
Its also happened on LAL/DEN game = 1H : 60-60 . and 2H : o/u=106.5.
2/" sucker bet " Ex: Sat game : LAC /GS : LAC lead by 24 by 1H , 2H line : GS -3.5 = sucker bet . the example : DOG + 8 @FG. 1H :DOG win by dd ( 11pts) . 2H : FAVOR -3 = sucker bet . If Favor -7 or 8 on 2H , then you mind reconsider . but FAVOR -3 = is sucker bet to lure ppl in on betting the Favor more , cz now FG : FAVOR +8 = favor become DOG in this scenario .
3/ yup : under = lowest =184.5 . and over = highest = LAL/DEN =213.5
... you can take noticed these and just make a minimum bet like 1u each time you see it . then you can come out ahead. You dont need to bet a lots , just minimum bet 1u each time , I think you can come out winning at the end of the day.
hey quick question cali, could you elaborate on "3. 2H bet" ? i dont quite understand slam and over (double it) etc..
for 4, which team would you give the "sucker bet" to? dogs are winning by dd so you would bet on the dogs or the favorites?
for the totals you would always under the lowest # and over the highest #?
thanks for answering bro!
1/yeah , its very classic 2H bet : yesterday was 2 games for the example : CHAR/ DET : 1H : way over 59-60 . and 2H : o/u = 98 . IF you bet the game $100 = UNDER . then you saw you already lost on the UNDER . then 2H : you gotta double the bet $200 on the UNDER . In the end , you won back $200 on under 2H -$100 lost on under game = $100 won .
Its also happened on LAL/DEN game = 1H : 60-60 . and 2H : o/u=106.5.
2/" sucker bet " Ex: Sat game : LAC /GS : LAC lead by 24 by 1H , 2H line : GS -3.5 = sucker bet . the example : DOG + 8 @FG. 1H :DOG win by dd ( 11pts) . 2H : FAVOR -3 = sucker bet . If Favor -7 or 8 on 2H , then you mind reconsider . but FAVOR -3 = is sucker bet to lure ppl in on betting the Favor more , cz now FG : FAVOR +8 = favor become DOG in this scenario .
3/ yup : under = lowest =184.5 . and over = highest = LAL/DEN =213.5
... you can take noticed these and just make a minimum bet like 1u each time you see it . then you can come out ahead. You dont need to bet a lots , just minimum bet 1u each time , I think you can come out winning at the end of the day.
And I take your over Detroit all in then spent 2k on stupid garbage game like kent that a waste , football now remind me playing video game upper level getting harder and harder ohh yea check this out to abb
And I take your over Detroit all in then spent 2k on stupid garbage game like kent that a waste , football now remind me playing video game upper level getting harder and harder ohh yea check this out to abb
And I take your over Detroit all in then spent 2k on stupid garbage game like kent that a waste , football now remind me playing video game upper level getting harder and harder ohh yea check this out to abb
haha true . I only play them at regular season , I do not like to bet on play off season , its getting harder to win , why we waste money on it , you know. Like last NBA play off season , I didnt bet on them . I love the regular season , NBA , NFL , CFB.... when many games to chose , and pick . Its easier ( more option ) to win than play off season , only few games or 1 game a day to pick .
And I take your over Detroit all in then spent 2k on stupid garbage game like kent that a waste , football now remind me playing video game upper level getting harder and harder ohh yea check this out to abb
haha true . I only play them at regular season , I do not like to bet on play off season , its getting harder to win , why we waste money on it , you know. Like last NBA play off season , I didnt bet on them . I love the regular season , NBA , NFL , CFB.... when many games to chose , and pick . Its easier ( more option ) to win than play off season , only few games or 1 game a day to pick .
Which mean take away the really high percent and the really low percent out then you got the result if u guarantees that team gonna win then we might hit both
Which mean take away the really high percent and the really low percent out then you got the result if u guarantees that team gonna win then we might hit both
Which tell u the result if u choose Miami gotta u with under
If u like was gotta go with over rather win both or lose both
For me . I think different : IF you pick DOG to win or cover the spread . then they gotta score a lots more than usual as other predict . so the game go OVER.
and If FAVOR win or cover ATS , then they held the DOG in low scoring . So the game go UNDER.
I have the formula in my rule of betting in this situation .
QUOTE Originally Posted by abadboycali:
x3- rice - love the formula : DOG + OVER n FAVOR + UNDER man , haha after all : today if you follow the formula ; you have OKC + UNDER + MIA + UNDER + CHAR + OVER + MEM + UNDER + DEN+ OVER : its good to do this parlay of 5 ( pick 2 games + 1 last game to hedge out the bet ) or parlay of 7 ( 3 games + 1 last game )
or the lowest MEM/PHO = UNDER . the highest DEN/LAL = OVER
Which tell u the result if u choose Miami gotta u with under
If u like was gotta go with over rather win both or lose both
For me . I think different : IF you pick DOG to win or cover the spread . then they gotta score a lots more than usual as other predict . so the game go OVER.
and If FAVOR win or cover ATS , then they held the DOG in low scoring . So the game go UNDER.
I have the formula in my rule of betting in this situation .
QUOTE Originally Posted by abadboycali:
x3- rice - love the formula : DOG + OVER n FAVOR + UNDER man , haha after all : today if you follow the formula ; you have OKC + UNDER + MIA + UNDER + CHAR + OVER + MEM + UNDER + DEN+ OVER : its good to do this parlay of 5 ( pick 2 games + 1 last game to hedge out the bet ) or parlay of 7 ( 3 games + 1 last game )
or the lowest MEM/PHO = UNDER . the highest DEN/LAL = OVER
Cause wah make me say like this because remember NYK playing with Magic it came out favor over , and Spur playing with Bucks thought it came out Spur Under Came out Spurs Over
01/05/13 Saturday
NYK %58. Over 46%
Magic %42. Under 64%
NYK/Over 104%
Magic/Under 108%
NYK/ Under 122% to high cant be
Magic/Over 88% to low
So the result rather NYK/Over or Magic/Under
Overall I still love your pick bro 1h, 2h whole gm too, you nasty , I respect ur system too bro
Cause wah make me say like this because remember NYK playing with Magic it came out favor over , and Spur playing with Bucks thought it came out Spur Under Came out Spurs Over
01/05/13 Saturday
NYK %58. Over 46%
Magic %42. Under 64%
NYK/Over 104%
Magic/Under 108%
NYK/ Under 122% to high cant be
Magic/Over 88% to low
So the result rather NYK/Over or Magic/Under
Overall I still love your pick bro 1h, 2h whole gm too, you nasty , I respect ur system too bro
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.