And TexasD can S my D, I hit 4/4 7 point teasers today for 245.00.
And no, I won't take your 3 point bet. Because that's not the argument or point here. If someone had Michigan as part of a teaser, it wasn't a 3 point teaser they were worried about losing. You may have a point in regards to buying a point or two, but make sure you're arguing correctly, before asking more people to read your statistics. I've traded futures and options for years, and could give less of a darn when it comes to your tutoring.
Woa, woa, woa man....watch YOURSELF. My comments on buying points were based off the original poster buying 4 points regardless of whether he called it a teaser, parlay, or straight bet. my data was based off of 0 to 3 points and 4 points ain't far off of the statistics. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF HE "TEASED" 4 ON THE GAME OR "BOUGHT 4" ON THE SINGLE GAME....THE PROBABILITIES OF 4 POINTS ARE THE SAME AS "TEASING 4" IN A TEASER, REGARDLESS OF IT BEING IN A PARLAY.
BOTTOM LINE IS HE BOUGHT 4 POINTS ON THE GAME AND IT'S NOT FAR OFF OF MY 3 POINT STATISTICS IN WHICH ON AVERAGE, THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BUYING 0.5 POINTS AND 3 POINTS ON A GRAPH IS LINEAR.
WHAT? NOW YOU WANNA BRING IN BUYING 7 POINTS??? WHICH IS 3 POINTS MORE THAN HE BOUGHT AS COMPARED TO 1 POINT OFF OF MY DATA?
I'm not saying you can't win teasers, parlays, or straight games where points are bought....IT'S THE ADDED JUICE YOU ARE PAYING ON THE 87% OF THE GAMES WHERE 3 POINTS DID NOT MATTER.....OR ON A LINEAR GRAPH WHERE THE GRAPH IS NEARLY A STRAIGHT LINE, 4 POINTS WOULD APPROXIMATELY AFFECT 17% OF THE GAMES AS OPPOSED TO 12.55% OF THE GAMES ON 3 POINTS.
And what do you pay in "juice" for 4 points? YOU PAY OVER 100% JUICE ON 4 POINTS!!! (3 points is -195)
Best of Luck, but 4 points ON A SINGLE GAME or 4 points IN A TEASER, HAVE THE SAME PROBABILITIES AND THE SAME JUICE....PERIOD.
And TexasD can S my D, I hit 4/4 7 point teasers today for 245.00.
And no, I won't take your 3 point bet. Because that's not the argument or point here. If someone had Michigan as part of a teaser, it wasn't a 3 point teaser they were worried about losing. You may have a point in regards to buying a point or two, but make sure you're arguing correctly, before asking more people to read your statistics. I've traded futures and options for years, and could give less of a darn when it comes to your tutoring.
Woa, woa, woa man....watch YOURSELF. My comments on buying points were based off the original poster buying 4 points regardless of whether he called it a teaser, parlay, or straight bet. my data was based off of 0 to 3 points and 4 points ain't far off of the statistics. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF HE "TEASED" 4 ON THE GAME OR "BOUGHT 4" ON THE SINGLE GAME....THE PROBABILITIES OF 4 POINTS ARE THE SAME AS "TEASING 4" IN A TEASER, REGARDLESS OF IT BEING IN A PARLAY.
BOTTOM LINE IS HE BOUGHT 4 POINTS ON THE GAME AND IT'S NOT FAR OFF OF MY 3 POINT STATISTICS IN WHICH ON AVERAGE, THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BUYING 0.5 POINTS AND 3 POINTS ON A GRAPH IS LINEAR.
WHAT? NOW YOU WANNA BRING IN BUYING 7 POINTS??? WHICH IS 3 POINTS MORE THAN HE BOUGHT AS COMPARED TO 1 POINT OFF OF MY DATA?
I'm not saying you can't win teasers, parlays, or straight games where points are bought....IT'S THE ADDED JUICE YOU ARE PAYING ON THE 87% OF THE GAMES WHERE 3 POINTS DID NOT MATTER.....OR ON A LINEAR GRAPH WHERE THE GRAPH IS NEARLY A STRAIGHT LINE, 4 POINTS WOULD APPROXIMATELY AFFECT 17% OF THE GAMES AS OPPOSED TO 12.55% OF THE GAMES ON 3 POINTS.
And what do you pay in "juice" for 4 points? YOU PAY OVER 100% JUICE ON 4 POINTS!!! (3 points is -195)
Best of Luck, but 4 points ON A SINGLE GAME or 4 points IN A TEASER, HAVE THE SAME PROBABILITIES AND THE SAME JUICE....PERIOD.
I DON'T POST IT TO SAY PEOPLE ARE DUMB FOR DOING IT...I POST IT TO OPEN EYES TO PEOPLE WHO HAVEN'T LOOKED AT HOW THEY GAMBLE.
IT'S REAL EASY FOR PEOPLE TO POINT OUT THE TIMES WHERE BUYING POINTS HELPED THEM, BUT IT'S THE 87%+ (ON 3 POINTS) OF THE TIME WHERE THE POINTS DID NOT MATTER WHERE THEY DON'T LOOK AT WHAT THEY'VE REALLY LOST!
I DON'T POST IT TO SAY PEOPLE ARE DUMB FOR DOING IT...I POST IT TO OPEN EYES TO PEOPLE WHO HAVEN'T LOOKED AT HOW THEY GAMBLE.
IT'S REAL EASY FOR PEOPLE TO POINT OUT THE TIMES WHERE BUYING POINTS HELPED THEM, BUT IT'S THE 87%+ (ON 3 POINTS) OF THE TIME WHERE THE POINTS DID NOT MATTER WHERE THEY DON'T LOOK AT WHAT THEY'VE REALLY LOST!
This guy is a friggin joke, and I'm tired of his posts. "Ain't far off" sounds very mathematical and something I'd want to wager my money on confidentially. Maybe you can pick 3 or 4 games teasing doesn't work after the games are played as evidence of your intelligence much like your San Diego play. Go preach somewhere else, loser. Your data Is limited and you're trying to make it stretch. Garbage in / garbage out. You've probably sold a trading system or two in your day.
Quote: Originally Posted by TexasD]
Woa, woa, woa man....watch YOURSELF. My comments on buying points were based off the original poster buying 4 points regardless of whether he called it a teaser, parlay, or straight bet. my data was based off of 0 to 3 points and 4 points ain't far off of the statistics. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF HE "TEASED" 4 ON THE GAME OR "BOUGHT 4" ON THE SINGLE GAME....THE PROBABILITIES OF 4 POINTS ARE THE SAME AS "TEASING 4" IN A TEASER, REGARDLESS OF IT BEING IN A PARLAY.
BOTTOM LINE IS HE BOUGHT 4 POINTS ON THE GAME AND IT'S NOT FAR OFF OF MY 3 POINT STATISTICS IN WHICH ON AVERAGE, THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BUYING 0.5 POINTS AND 3 POINTS ON A GRAPH IS LINEAR.
WHAT? NOW YOU WANNA BRING IN BUYING 7 POINTS??? WHICH IS 3 POINTS MORE THAN HE BOUGHT AS COMPARED TO 1 POINT OFF OF MY DATA?
I'm not saying you can't win teasers, parlays, or straight games where points are bought....IT'S THE ADDED JUICE YOU ARE PAYING ON THE 87% OF THE GAMES WHERE 3 POINTS DID NOT MATTER.....OR ON A LINEAR GRAPH WHERE THE GRAPH IS NEARLY A STRAIGHT LINE, 4 POINTS WOULD APPROXIMATELY AFFECT 17% OF THE GAMES AS OPPOSED TO 12.55% OF THE GAMES ON 3 POINTS.
And what do you pay in "juice" for 4 points? YOU PAY OVER 100% JUICE ON 4 POINTS!!! (3 points is -195)
Best of Luck, but 4 points ON A SINGLE GAME or 4 points IN A TEASER, HAVE THE SAME PROBABILITIES AND THE SAME JUICE....PERIOD. [/Quote]
This guy is a friggin joke, and I'm tired of his posts. "Ain't far off" sounds very mathematical and something I'd want to wager my money on confidentially. Maybe you can pick 3 or 4 games teasing doesn't work after the games are played as evidence of your intelligence much like your San Diego play. Go preach somewhere else, loser. Your data Is limited and you're trying to make it stretch. Garbage in / garbage out. You've probably sold a trading system or two in your day.
Quote: Originally Posted by TexasD]
Woa, woa, woa man....watch YOURSELF. My comments on buying points were based off the original poster buying 4 points regardless of whether he called it a teaser, parlay, or straight bet. my data was based off of 0 to 3 points and 4 points ain't far off of the statistics. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF HE "TEASED" 4 ON THE GAME OR "BOUGHT 4" ON THE SINGLE GAME....THE PROBABILITIES OF 4 POINTS ARE THE SAME AS "TEASING 4" IN A TEASER, REGARDLESS OF IT BEING IN A PARLAY.
BOTTOM LINE IS HE BOUGHT 4 POINTS ON THE GAME AND IT'S NOT FAR OFF OF MY 3 POINT STATISTICS IN WHICH ON AVERAGE, THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BUYING 0.5 POINTS AND 3 POINTS ON A GRAPH IS LINEAR.
WHAT? NOW YOU WANNA BRING IN BUYING 7 POINTS??? WHICH IS 3 POINTS MORE THAN HE BOUGHT AS COMPARED TO 1 POINT OFF OF MY DATA?
I'm not saying you can't win teasers, parlays, or straight games where points are bought....IT'S THE ADDED JUICE YOU ARE PAYING ON THE 87% OF THE GAMES WHERE 3 POINTS DID NOT MATTER.....OR ON A LINEAR GRAPH WHERE THE GRAPH IS NEARLY A STRAIGHT LINE, 4 POINTS WOULD APPROXIMATELY AFFECT 17% OF THE GAMES AS OPPOSED TO 12.55% OF THE GAMES ON 3 POINTS.
And what do you pay in "juice" for 4 points? YOU PAY OVER 100% JUICE ON 4 POINTS!!! (3 points is -195)
Best of Luck, but 4 points ON A SINGLE GAME or 4 points IN A TEASER, HAVE THE SAME PROBABILITIES AND THE SAME JUICE....PERIOD. [/Quote]
"Ain't far off" - I'm dying to put my hard earned money on your thoughts. Please enlighten us all with three or four games a teaser failed after the game has been played, like your San Diego play. What a friggin joke. I hope people aren't buying into your garbage. Virgin.
"Ain't far off" - I'm dying to put my hard earned money on your thoughts. Please enlighten us all with three or four games a teaser failed after the game has been played, like your San Diego play. What a friggin joke. I hope people aren't buying into your garbage. Virgin.
"Ain't far off" - I'm dying to put my hard earned money on your thoughts. Please enlighten us all with three or four games a teaser failed after the game has been played, like your San Diego play. What a friggin joke. I hope people aren't buying into your garbage. Virgin.
What is your deal? You finally get to use your second handle on Covers? These are pretty much your first posts when you opened your other name back in November of 2011. Just fishin' ain't you? Best of Luck on that.
I NEVER SAID SAN DIEGO WAS A PLAY AT ALL, BUT YOU CAN KEEP CRYING LIKE A CHILD IF YOU WANT.
15 posts...you must really be helpful in this forum POSTING ALL YOUR KNOWLEDGEABLE PLAYS, HUH?
"Ain't far off" - I'm dying to put my hard earned money on your thoughts. Please enlighten us all with three or four games a teaser failed after the game has been played, like your San Diego play. What a friggin joke. I hope people aren't buying into your garbage. Virgin.
What is your deal? You finally get to use your second handle on Covers? These are pretty much your first posts when you opened your other name back in November of 2011. Just fishin' ain't you? Best of Luck on that.
I NEVER SAID SAN DIEGO WAS A PLAY AT ALL, BUT YOU CAN KEEP CRYING LIKE A CHILD IF YOU WANT.
15 posts...you must really be helpful in this forum POSTING ALL YOUR KNOWLEDGEABLE PLAYS, HUH?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.