You really are f******* stupid
I'm not the one who is trying to bog the server down with links from 2007 and who has demonstrated he doesn't know who Phil Jones is.
You are.
Everybody reading can draw their own conclusions.
You really are f******* stupid
I'm not the one who is trying to bog the server down with links from 2007 and who has demonstrated he doesn't know who Phil Jones is.
You are.
Everybody reading can draw their own conclusions.
You really are f******* stupid
I'm not the one who is trying to bog the server down with links from 2007 and who has demonstrated he doesn't know who Phil Jones is.
You are.
Everybody reading can draw their own conclusions.
These Democrats don't know how to quit saying stupid things:
Stronger gun control laws would have prevented the accused Boston bombers from getting firearms and could prevent future terror attacks, according to a New York Democratic lawmaker.
Rep. Carolyn Maloney said on Monday that tighter background checks and increased penalties for straw purchasers would help thwart terrorism, citing Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the suspects in the Boston Marathon bombing, who waged a late-night firefight with police and are accused of shooting and killing an MIT security guard.
This wouldn’t have prevented the Boston bombings — because, you know, they were bombings.
They’re really pushing to have a constitutional right blocked by your placement on a secret list put together by unaccountable bureaucrats with no due process. Just to be clear what they’re really talking about.
These Democrats don't know how to quit saying stupid things:
Stronger gun control laws would have prevented the accused Boston bombers from getting firearms and could prevent future terror attacks, according to a New York Democratic lawmaker.
Rep. Carolyn Maloney said on Monday that tighter background checks and increased penalties for straw purchasers would help thwart terrorism, citing Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the suspects in the Boston Marathon bombing, who waged a late-night firefight with police and are accused of shooting and killing an MIT security guard.
This wouldn’t have prevented the Boston bombings — because, you know, they were bombings.
They’re really pushing to have a constitutional right blocked by your placement on a secret list put together by unaccountable bureaucrats with no due process. Just to be clear what they’re really talking about.
You really are f******* stupid
I'm not the one who is trying to bog the server down with links from 2007 and who has demonstrated he doesn't know who Phil Jones is.
You are.
Everybody reading can draw their own conclusions.
You really are f******* stupid
I'm not the one who is trying to bog the server down with links from 2007 and who has demonstrated he doesn't know who Phil Jones is.
You are.
Everybody reading can draw their own conclusions.
But hey! Whatever links some truckdriver posts on the internet just cancels out everything right....
Notice that he takes to the Internet to proclaim "everybody said so" as if that is persuasive.
Meanwhile:
In this respect, we could be in for a cooling period that lasts 200-250 years. The period of low solar activity could start in 2030-2040 but it won’t be as pervasive as in the late 17th century".
Read more: https://english.ruvr.ru/2013_04_22/Cooling-in-the-Arctic-what-to-expect/
Yes, despite the fact that there is super-duper, irrefutable "evidence" of global warming, Russian scientists are predicting global cooling.
What is even funnier about stilin's behavior here, is that he doesn't recognize he's not posting any information more current than 4 years ago.
Everyone reading can draw their own conclusions.
But hey! Whatever links some truckdriver posts on the internet just cancels out everything right....
Notice that he takes to the Internet to proclaim "everybody said so" as if that is persuasive.
Meanwhile:
In this respect, we could be in for a cooling period that lasts 200-250 years. The period of low solar activity could start in 2030-2040 but it won’t be as pervasive as in the late 17th century".
Read more: https://english.ruvr.ru/2013_04_22/Cooling-in-the-Arctic-what-to-expect/
Yes, despite the fact that there is super-duper, irrefutable "evidence" of global warming, Russian scientists are predicting global cooling.
What is even funnier about stilin's behavior here, is that he doesn't recognize he's not posting any information more current than 4 years ago.
Everyone reading can draw their own conclusions.
But hey! Whatever links some truckdriver posts on the internet just cancels out everything right....
Notice that he takes to the Internet to proclaim "everybody said so" as if that is persuasive.
Meanwhile:
In this respect, we could be in for a cooling period that lasts 200-250 years. The period of low solar activity could start in 2030-2040 but it won’t be as pervasive as in the late 17th century".
Read more: https://english.ruvr.ru/2013_04_22/Cooling-in-the-Arctic-what-to-expect/
Yes, despite the fact that there is super-duper, irrefutable "evidence" of global warming, Russian scientists are predicting global cooling.
What is even funnier about stilin's behavior here, is that he doesn't recognize he's not posting any information more current than 4 years ago.
Everyone reading can draw their own conclusions.
But hey! Whatever links some truckdriver posts on the internet just cancels out everything right....
Notice that he takes to the Internet to proclaim "everybody said so" as if that is persuasive.
Meanwhile:
In this respect, we could be in for a cooling period that lasts 200-250 years. The period of low solar activity could start in 2030-2040 but it won’t be as pervasive as in the late 17th century".
Read more: https://english.ruvr.ru/2013_04_22/Cooling-in-the-Arctic-what-to-expect/
Yes, despite the fact that there is super-duper, irrefutable "evidence" of global warming, Russian scientists are predicting global cooling.
What is even funnier about stilin's behavior here, is that he doesn't recognize he's not posting any information more current than 4 years ago.
Everyone reading can draw their own conclusions.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.