my point is that romney and many of the aliases in here point to staples success as a romney success. it most certainly is and was not.
While I'm at it WSC I don't think I saw your post to AHD yesterday when he compared Zimmerman to Hitler.
I surely expected someone other than myself to let him know that was out of line or ridiculous.
Maybe we should appeal to Rizzo to recruit a couple conservative Moderators to balance you and djbrow out.
What do you think?
While I'm at it WSC I don't think I saw your post to AHD yesterday when he compared Zimmerman to Hitler.
I surely expected someone other than myself to let him know that was out of line or ridiculous.
Maybe we should appeal to Rizzo to recruit a couple conservative Moderators to balance you and djbrow out.
What do you think?
Sometimes we have to come accross as whining to get a pinch of justice in here.
It's OK....we're getting well used to the conservatives only getting called out on stuff.
Regarding AHD....does that mean you will now read his post where he compares Hitler to Zimmerman and let him know it aint right?
You could use the positive PR you know!
Sometimes we have to come accross as whining to get a pinch of justice in here.
It's OK....we're getting well used to the conservatives only getting called out on stuff.
Regarding AHD....does that mean you will now read his post where he compares Hitler to Zimmerman and let him know it aint right?
You could use the positive PR you know!
Sometimes we have to come accross as whining to get a pinch of justice in here.
It's OK....we're getting well used to the conservatives only getting called out on stuff.
Regarding AHD....does that mean you will now read his post where he compares Hitler to Zimmerman and let him know it aint right?
You could use the positive PR you know!
Sometimes we have to come accross as whining to get a pinch of justice in here.
It's OK....we're getting well used to the conservatives only getting called out on stuff.
Regarding AHD....does that mean you will now read his post where he compares Hitler to Zimmerman and let him know it aint right?
You could use the positive PR you know!
Three reasons why you should MYOB:
1.This is not a Sarah Palin thread.
2.This is not a Tea Party thread.
3. See # 1 and # 2
If you were such an 'independent' you would critique the liberals every now and then.
Three reasons why you should MYOB:
1.This is not a Sarah Palin thread.
2.This is not a Tea Party thread.
3. See # 1 and # 2
If you were such an 'independent' you would critique the liberals every now and then.
and the other people point to all of Bains failures and say "Romneys fault" whether he was there or not or whether he may or may not have supported it or not.
again, what's your point.............
and the other people point to all of Bains failures and say "Romneys fault" whether he was there or not or whether he may or may not have supported it or not.
again, what's your point.............
the liberal ion you bleeds all over this forum.
Its called comparing candidates................dont get your panties in a knot everytime someone compares a situation of Romneys experience to that of Obamas
the liberal ion you bleeds all over this forum.
Its called comparing candidates................dont get your panties in a knot everytime someone compares a situation of Romneys experience to that of Obamas
and the other people point to all of Bains failures and say "Romneys fault" whether he was there or not or whether he may or may not have supported it or not.
again, what's your point.............
and the other people point to all of Bains failures and say "Romneys fault" whether he was there or not or whether he may or may not have supported it or not.
again, what's your point.............
the liberal ion you bleeds all over this forum.
Its called comparing candidates................dont get your panties in a knot everytime someone compares a situation of Romneys experience to that of Obamas
the liberal ion you bleeds all over this forum.
Its called comparing candidates................dont get your panties in a knot everytime someone compares a situation of Romneys experience to that of Obamas
I know silly ass. I was in the middle of posting that for WSC.
Mainstream media will never touch this....for obvious reasons.
I know silly ass. I was in the middle of posting that for WSC.
Mainstream media will never touch this....for obvious reasons.
And by skeptical, I know, I know...you meant to say biased.
And by skeptical, I know, I know...you meant to say biased.
And by skeptical, I know, I know...you meant to say biased.
And by skeptical, I know, I know...you meant to say biased.
keep on topic as long as it suits your agenda
there is no deflection here at all.
Mitt has practical biz experience whether he liked the staples deal or not.....Obama does not.
That is comparing candidates and is not "propping one up" as you say.
Are you telling me when you look at candidate A and B you dont have a thought process or a way to compare the two so you can make an eduducated choice?
Or maybe you just pull whatever handle is labeled D and not bother vetting or comparing one candidate to another?
keep on topic as long as it suits your agenda
there is no deflection here at all.
Mitt has practical biz experience whether he liked the staples deal or not.....Obama does not.
That is comparing candidates and is not "propping one up" as you say.
Are you telling me when you look at candidate A and B you dont have a thought process or a way to compare the two so you can make an eduducated choice?
Or maybe you just pull whatever handle is labeled D and not bother vetting or comparing one candidate to another?
keep on topic as long as it suits your agenda
there is no deflection here at all.
Mitt has practical biz experience whether he liked the staples deal or not.....Obama does not.
That is comparing candidates and is not "propping one up" as you say.
Are you telling me when you look at candidate A and B you dont have a thought process or a way to compare the two so you can make an eduducated choice?
Or maybe you just pull whatever handle is labeled D and not bother vetting or comparing one candidate to another?
keep on topic as long as it suits your agenda
there is no deflection here at all.
Mitt has practical biz experience whether he liked the staples deal or not.....Obama does not.
That is comparing candidates and is not "propping one up" as you say.
Are you telling me when you look at candidate A and B you dont have a thought process or a way to compare the two so you can make an eduducated choice?
Or maybe you just pull whatever handle is labeled D and not bother vetting or comparing one candidate to another?
Mainstream sites would never carry a story of this nature. Their grip on O's ball sack is every bit as tight as yours.
Mainstream sites would never carry a story of this nature. Their grip on O's ball sack is every bit as tight as yours.
Mainstream sites would never carry a story of this nature. Their grip on O's ball sack is every bit as tight as yours.
Mainstream sites would never carry a story of this nature. Their grip on O's ball sack is every bit as tight as yours.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.