Because. A sucker punch is the most likely that would have broken his nose. If not a sucker punch then may have been partially blocked.
If you're carrying a concealed weopon aren't you doing everything possible to avoid physical confrontation that may lead to that gun being stolen from you?
Because. A sucker punch is the most likely that would have broken his nose. If not a sucker punch then may have been partially blocked.
If you're carrying a concealed weopon aren't you doing everything possible to avoid physical confrontation that may lead to that gun being stolen from you?
You didn't read post #1 and #2?
You didn't read post #1 and #2?
You didn't read post #1 and #2?
You didn't read post #1 and #2?
You didn't read post #1 and #2?
You didn't read post #1 and #2?
Because. A sucker punch is the most likely that would have broken his nose. If not a sucker punch then may have been partially blocked.
If you're carrying a concealed weopon aren't you doing everything possible to avoid physical confrontation that may lead to that gun being stolen from you?
Because. A sucker punch is the most likely that would have broken his nose. If not a sucker punch then may have been partially blocked.
If you're carrying a concealed weopon aren't you doing everything possible to avoid physical confrontation that may lead to that gun being stolen from you?
If you read post 1 and 2 you would see that there were a couple of guys that got away and Zimmerman didn't want that to happen again.
Besides, he has as much right to be anywhere on the complex as Trayvon did so what is the big deal?
The dispatcher or any peace officer would not be able to lawfully tell Zimmerman he couldn't follow Trayvon.
All of that bs doesn't even MATTER because person A has the right to ask person B a question and vica versa.
The only thing that matters is who started the physical fight and who caused the other to feel at some point that they were in danger of serious bodily harm or death. Period.
If you read post 1 and 2 you would see that there were a couple of guys that got away and Zimmerman didn't want that to happen again.
Besides, he has as much right to be anywhere on the complex as Trayvon did so what is the big deal?
The dispatcher or any peace officer would not be able to lawfully tell Zimmerman he couldn't follow Trayvon.
All of that bs doesn't even MATTER because person A has the right to ask person B a question and vica versa.
The only thing that matters is who started the physical fight and who caused the other to feel at some point that they were in danger of serious bodily harm or death. Period.
If you read post 1 and 2 you would see that there were a couple of guys that got away and Zimmerman didn't want that to happen again.
Besides, he has as much right to be anywhere on the complex as Trayvon did so what is the big deal?
The dispatcher or any peace officer would not be able to lawfully tell Zimmerman he couldn't follow Trayvon.
All of that bs doesn't even MATTER because person A has the right to ask person B a question and vica versa.
The only thing that matters is who started the physical fight and who caused the other to feel at some point that they were in danger of serious bodily harm or death. Period.
If you read post 1 and 2 you would see that there were a couple of guys that got away and Zimmerman didn't want that to happen again.
Besides, he has as much right to be anywhere on the complex as Trayvon did so what is the big deal?
The dispatcher or any peace officer would not be able to lawfully tell Zimmerman he couldn't follow Trayvon.
All of that bs doesn't even MATTER because person A has the right to ask person B a question and vica versa.
The only thing that matters is who started the physical fight and who caused the other to feel at some point that they were in danger of serious bodily harm or death. Period.
Well isnt that obvious? But how was he supposed to know for certain that he wouldn't be able to ask Trayvon what he was doing there without being sucker punched.
I don't believe Zimmerman started any fight because of the before mentioned fact that he had a concealed weopon and that just isn't smart to 'wrastle' while you're concealing.
Well isnt that obvious? But how was he supposed to know for certain that he wouldn't be able to ask Trayvon what he was doing there without being sucker punched.
I don't believe Zimmerman started any fight because of the before mentioned fact that he had a concealed weopon and that just isn't smart to 'wrastle' while you're concealing.
As far as the concealment goes. Zimmerman knew he had a gun concealed on him. People that have guns on them are far less willing to initiate a physical confrontation because the gun would be much more likely to be taken from them and used against them.
Thats why I believe there was a sucker punch because Zimmerman would have been stupid to start somthing due to the above paragraph.
As far as the concealment goes. Zimmerman knew he had a gun concealed on him. People that have guns on them are far less willing to initiate a physical confrontation because the gun would be much more likely to be taken from them and used against them.
Thats why I believe there was a sucker punch because Zimmerman would have been stupid to start somthing due to the above paragraph.
You would have tried to make sure he didn't get away too if you cared about the neighborhood. Who knew that it would lead to what it did?
Hindsight is 20/20. Easy to monday morning qb that one dude.
You would have tried to make sure he didn't get away too if you cared about the neighborhood. Who knew that it would lead to what it did?
Hindsight is 20/20. Easy to monday morning qb that one dude.
Even more interesting as to your last 4 months or more of posting on this forum.
Seems to me that you post 95% about the posters that have the balls to have a take, and 5% posting anything else.
What is your value to the forum these days?
Is it calling out aliases?
Is it calling out cut/paste tea party sarah palin rhetoric?
What is your value to the forum going forward?
Cause it surely isn't debating current events.
Even more interesting as to your last 4 months or more of posting on this forum.
Seems to me that you post 95% about the posters that have the balls to have a take, and 5% posting anything else.
What is your value to the forum these days?
Is it calling out aliases?
Is it calling out cut/paste tea party sarah palin rhetoric?
What is your value to the forum going forward?
Cause it surely isn't debating current events.
Why be so disrespectful with the truth?
The so called officer never identified himself as a ATF agent until after he pushed him.
If you have a gun and start a fight then you are even more ignorant than I thought.
I don't think Trayvon is a violent thug, but I don't he is an innocent little kid like they tried to portray him either.
The broken nose doesn't prove who threw the first punch, but that, and the lacerations on the back of his head prove that he was assaulted at some point and I've heard nothing to prove that Trayvon was assaulted at ANY point.
I just chose to believe the most likely scenario.
I don't have a huge issue with him being arrested, I think there is not enough evidence for a conviction of murder 2.
You don't have to be a violent person to shoot someone in self defense. If 45 other calls to police didn't end up with this outcome, I think its safe to say that he is not a Jekyl and hyde.
Zimmerman had no way of knowing that Trayvon would have assaulted him when the two of them met.
Why be so disrespectful with the truth?
The so called officer never identified himself as a ATF agent until after he pushed him.
If you have a gun and start a fight then you are even more ignorant than I thought.
I don't think Trayvon is a violent thug, but I don't he is an innocent little kid like they tried to portray him either.
The broken nose doesn't prove who threw the first punch, but that, and the lacerations on the back of his head prove that he was assaulted at some point and I've heard nothing to prove that Trayvon was assaulted at ANY point.
I just chose to believe the most likely scenario.
I don't have a huge issue with him being arrested, I think there is not enough evidence for a conviction of murder 2.
You don't have to be a violent person to shoot someone in self defense. If 45 other calls to police didn't end up with this outcome, I think its safe to say that he is not a Jekyl and hyde.
Zimmerman had no way of knowing that Trayvon would have assaulted him when the two of them met.
Why be so disrespectful with the truth?
The so called officer never identified himself as a ATF agent until after he pushed him.
If you have a gun and start a fight then you are even more ignorant than I thought.
I don't think Trayvon is a violent thug, but I don't he is an innocent little kid like they tried to portray him either.
The broken nose doesn't prove who threw the first punch, but that, and the lacerations on the back of his head prove that he was assaulted at some point and I've heard nothing to prove that Trayvon was assaulted at ANY point.
I just chose to believe the most likely scenario.
I don't have a huge issue with him being arrested, I think there is not enough evidence for a conviction of murder 2.
You don't have to be a violent person to shoot someone in self defense. If 45 other calls to police didn't end up with this outcome, I think its safe to say that he is not a Jekyl and hyde.
Zimmerman had no way of knowing that Trayvon would have assaulted him when the two of them met.
Why be so disrespectful with the truth?
The so called officer never identified himself as a ATF agent until after he pushed him.
If you have a gun and start a fight then you are even more ignorant than I thought.
I don't think Trayvon is a violent thug, but I don't he is an innocent little kid like they tried to portray him either.
The broken nose doesn't prove who threw the first punch, but that, and the lacerations on the back of his head prove that he was assaulted at some point and I've heard nothing to prove that Trayvon was assaulted at ANY point.
I just chose to believe the most likely scenario.
I don't have a huge issue with him being arrested, I think there is not enough evidence for a conviction of murder 2.
You don't have to be a violent person to shoot someone in self defense. If 45 other calls to police didn't end up with this outcome, I think its safe to say that he is not a Jekyl and hyde.
Zimmerman had no way of knowing that Trayvon would have assaulted him when the two of them met.
I asked why you have been so disrespectful with the truth in response to your statement about Zimmerman assaulting a police officer. We both know that he was never charged for that and the officer didnt identify himself as such at first.
My nose has never broken itself and my head has never lacerated itself. Zimmerman did not assault himself. The broken nose is insignificant by itself. The lacerations on the back of his head help to corroborate his story that Trayvon pounded his head into the sidewalk.
Since lack of wounds or bruises can prove nothing why bring them up? You cannot assume Zimmerman threw any punches or assaulted Trayvon without somthing to back it up...witness statements or bruising or black eye or whatever. You cannot make it up though.
Consumed with anger....thats bs...He didn't even sound angry on the call to police. You know how to detect anger dont you?
I asked why you have been so disrespectful with the truth in response to your statement about Zimmerman assaulting a police officer. We both know that he was never charged for that and the officer didnt identify himself as such at first.
My nose has never broken itself and my head has never lacerated itself. Zimmerman did not assault himself. The broken nose is insignificant by itself. The lacerations on the back of his head help to corroborate his story that Trayvon pounded his head into the sidewalk.
Since lack of wounds or bruises can prove nothing why bring them up? You cannot assume Zimmerman threw any punches or assaulted Trayvon without somthing to back it up...witness statements or bruising or black eye or whatever. You cannot make it up though.
Consumed with anger....thats bs...He didn't even sound angry on the call to police. You know how to detect anger dont you?
I asked why you have been so disrespectful with the truth in response to your statement about Zimmerman assaulting a police officer. We both know that he was never charged for that and the officer didnt identify himself as such at first.
My nose has never broken itself and my head has never lacerated itself. Zimmerman did not assault himself. The broken nose is insignificant by itself. The lacerations on the back of his head help to corroborate his story that Trayvon pounded his head into the sidewalk.
Since lack of wounds or bruises can prove nothing why bring them up? You cannot assume Zimmerman threw any punches or assaulted Trayvon without somthing to back it up...witness statements or bruising or black eye or whatever. You cannot make it up though.
Consumed with anger....thats bs...He didn't even sound angry on the call to police. You know how to detect anger dont you?
I asked why you have been so disrespectful with the truth in response to your statement about Zimmerman assaulting a police officer. We both know that he was never charged for that and the officer didnt identify himself as such at first.
My nose has never broken itself and my head has never lacerated itself. Zimmerman did not assault himself. The broken nose is insignificant by itself. The lacerations on the back of his head help to corroborate his story that Trayvon pounded his head into the sidewalk.
Since lack of wounds or bruises can prove nothing why bring them up? You cannot assume Zimmerman threw any punches or assaulted Trayvon without somthing to back it up...witness statements or bruising or black eye or whatever. You cannot make it up though.
Consumed with anger....thats bs...He didn't even sound angry on the call to police. You know how to detect anger dont you?
Again you disrespect the truth.
The DISPATCHER merely advised him not to follow.
He may have been arrested for the ATF thing...CHARGES DROPPED. Very key. You have convicted him for that.
...And he sounded like a victim on the recorded call to police. Tremored "Hes coming to check me out" about to pee his pants.
Again...didnt sound angry on that call. Again, you do know how to recognize rage don't you?
Again you disrespect the truth.
The DISPATCHER merely advised him not to follow.
He may have been arrested for the ATF thing...CHARGES DROPPED. Very key. You have convicted him for that.
...And he sounded like a victim on the recorded call to police. Tremored "Hes coming to check me out" about to pee his pants.
Again...didnt sound angry on that call. Again, you do know how to recognize rage don't you?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.