Under a month now, starting to look at week 1.. here's what I'm thinking... let's have a discussion... nothing set it stone yet- still some time to figure it out...week 1/2 can always be tricky and can be your opinion vs the sportsbook... situations come out way more as the season unfolds (where most of my bets live)
Week 1
Tulane -3 vs FIU
Even though Tulane only returns 3 O starters, they return QB McMillan who went 5-1 in his 6 starts last year. What I like, especially early on, is Ds are usually ahead of the O. Tulane has 8 starters back, including entire DL that was 16th in the country at Havoc % last year. FIU was 105th in D Eff per S&P and 111th in rush eff D LY- while Tulane was 23rd in the country in rush O LY. Tulane 31-24
Rutgers -14.5 vs UMASS
Somehow I talked myself into this, even with @Iowa next week for the Scarlet Knights. Rutgers came out swinging LY (beat Texas ST by 28) and UMASS might be worst team in FBS. They only return 3 D starters too boot. I just don't see how UMASS scores here... Rutgers- 34-3
VT -2.5 at BC
Feel this will be ver public play as BC loses a ton on both sides of the ball (5 O starters back, 4 D back). BC also replacing entire secondary. VT brings back 8 on D, and even though they sucked vs the run, I'm banking on an improvement with so many people back- including their entire secondary. VT 27-17
Missouri -15 at Wyoming
Tigers return 7 O starters and have Clemson transfer Bryant. Better yet, they return good chunk of their D- Missouri 7th in run eff and Wyoming can't really throw the ball. If they take the game seriously, like WSU did last year- Cowboys get run out... Missouri- 41-17
Tennessee -25.5 vs. Georgia State
Off 5-7 year and less than stellar results against inferior teams, now is the time for a blowout and blowout early. Tenn returns 7 O starters against a GSU team that was 127th in D Eff, 128th in explosive D and 126th in pass eff D LY. No real lookahead for Vols early who score early and often... Tenn 49-10
Also, small leans to Wake -3.5 (Utah St loses a TON from last year), Wash State -33.5(NMSU is 2nd worst team behind UMASS and should score 50) and Pitt +3 (not buying UVA hype just yet)
Under a month now, starting to look at week 1.. here's what I'm thinking... let's have a discussion... nothing set it stone yet- still some time to figure it out...week 1/2 can always be tricky and can be your opinion vs the sportsbook... situations come out way more as the season unfolds (where most of my bets live)
Week 1
Tulane -3 vs FIU
Even though Tulane only returns 3 O starters, they return QB McMillan who went 5-1 in his 6 starts last year. What I like, especially early on, is Ds are usually ahead of the O. Tulane has 8 starters back, including entire DL that was 16th in the country at Havoc % last year. FIU was 105th in D Eff per S&P and 111th in rush eff D LY- while Tulane was 23rd in the country in rush O LY. Tulane 31-24
Rutgers -14.5 vs UMASS
Somehow I talked myself into this, even with @Iowa next week for the Scarlet Knights. Rutgers came out swinging LY (beat Texas ST by 28) and UMASS might be worst team in FBS. They only return 3 D starters too boot. I just don't see how UMASS scores here... Rutgers- 34-3
VT -2.5 at BC
Feel this will be ver public play as BC loses a ton on both sides of the ball (5 O starters back, 4 D back). BC also replacing entire secondary. VT brings back 8 on D, and even though they sucked vs the run, I'm banking on an improvement with so many people back- including their entire secondary. VT 27-17
Missouri -15 at Wyoming
Tigers return 7 O starters and have Clemson transfer Bryant. Better yet, they return good chunk of their D- Missouri 7th in run eff and Wyoming can't really throw the ball. If they take the game seriously, like WSU did last year- Cowboys get run out... Missouri- 41-17
Tennessee -25.5 vs. Georgia State
Off 5-7 year and less than stellar results against inferior teams, now is the time for a blowout and blowout early. Tenn returns 7 O starters against a GSU team that was 127th in D Eff, 128th in explosive D and 126th in pass eff D LY. No real lookahead for Vols early who score early and often... Tenn 49-10
Also, small leans to Wake -3.5 (Utah St loses a TON from last year), Wash State -33.5(NMSU is 2nd worst team behind UMASS and should score 50) and Pitt +3 (not buying UVA hype just yet)
Under a month now, starting to look at week 1.. here's what I'm thinking... let's have a discussion... nothing set it stone yet- still some time to figure it out...week 1/2 can always be tricky and can be your opinion vs the sportsbook... situations come out way more as the season unfolds (where most of my bets live) Week 1 Tulane -3 vs FIU Even though Tulane only returns 3 O starters, they return QB McMillan who went 5-1 in his 6 starts last year. What I like, especially early on, is Ds are usually ahead of the O. Tulane has 8 starters back, including entire DL that was 16th in the country at Havoc % last year. FIU was 105th in D Eff per S&P and 111th in rush eff D LY- while Tulane was 23rd in the country in rush O LY. Tulane 31-24 Rutgers -14.5 vs UMASS Somehow I talked myself into this, even with @Iowa next week for the Scarlet Knights. Rutgers came out swinging LY (beat Texas ST by 28) and UMASS might be worst team in FBS. They only return 3 D starters too boot. I just don't see how UMASS scores here... Rutgers- 34-3 VT -2.5 at BC Feel this will be ver public play as BC loses a ton on both sides of the ball (5 O starters back, 4 D back). BC also replacing entire secondary. VT brings back 8 on D, and even though they sucked vs the run, I'm banking on an improvement with so many people back- including their entire secondary. VT 27-17 Missouri -15 at Wyoming Tigers return 7 O starters and have Clemson transfer Bryant. Better yet, they return good chunk of their D- Missouri 7th in run eff and Wyoming can't really throw the ball. If they take the game seriously, like WSU did last year- Cowboys get run out... Missouri- 41-17 Tennessee -25.5 vs. Georgia State Off 5-7 year and less than stellar results against inferior teams, now is the time for a blowout and blowout early. Tenn returns 7 O starters against a GSU team that was 127th in D Eff, 128th in explosive D and 126th in pass eff D LY. No real lookahead for Vols early who score early and often... Tenn 49-10 Also, small leans to Wake -3.5 (Utah St loses a TON from last year), Wash State -33.5(NMSU is 2nd worst team behind UMASS and should score 50) and Pitt +3 (not buying UVA hype just yet) Thoughts? Comments?
Tennessee worries me. They should kill Georgia State, but as someone who got burned when they failed to cover against UTEP last season, I'm a little gun shy.
Pitt lost their OL and their RBs. I don't like Pitt.
Love Mizzou, Wake, Wazzou for all the reasons that you list.. Rutgers is intriguing, and I completely agree with you about UMASS.
Under a month now, starting to look at week 1.. here's what I'm thinking... let's have a discussion... nothing set it stone yet- still some time to figure it out...week 1/2 can always be tricky and can be your opinion vs the sportsbook... situations come out way more as the season unfolds (where most of my bets live) Week 1 Tulane -3 vs FIU Even though Tulane only returns 3 O starters, they return QB McMillan who went 5-1 in his 6 starts last year. What I like, especially early on, is Ds are usually ahead of the O. Tulane has 8 starters back, including entire DL that was 16th in the country at Havoc % last year. FIU was 105th in D Eff per S&P and 111th in rush eff D LY- while Tulane was 23rd in the country in rush O LY. Tulane 31-24 Rutgers -14.5 vs UMASS Somehow I talked myself into this, even with @Iowa next week for the Scarlet Knights. Rutgers came out swinging LY (beat Texas ST by 28) and UMASS might be worst team in FBS. They only return 3 D starters too boot. I just don't see how UMASS scores here... Rutgers- 34-3 VT -2.5 at BC Feel this will be ver public play as BC loses a ton on both sides of the ball (5 O starters back, 4 D back). BC also replacing entire secondary. VT brings back 8 on D, and even though they sucked vs the run, I'm banking on an improvement with so many people back- including their entire secondary. VT 27-17 Missouri -15 at Wyoming Tigers return 7 O starters and have Clemson transfer Bryant. Better yet, they return good chunk of their D- Missouri 7th in run eff and Wyoming can't really throw the ball. If they take the game seriously, like WSU did last year- Cowboys get run out... Missouri- 41-17 Tennessee -25.5 vs. Georgia State Off 5-7 year and less than stellar results against inferior teams, now is the time for a blowout and blowout early. Tenn returns 7 O starters against a GSU team that was 127th in D Eff, 128th in explosive D and 126th in pass eff D LY. No real lookahead for Vols early who score early and often... Tenn 49-10 Also, small leans to Wake -3.5 (Utah St loses a TON from last year), Wash State -33.5(NMSU is 2nd worst team behind UMASS and should score 50) and Pitt +3 (not buying UVA hype just yet) Thoughts? Comments?
Tennessee worries me. They should kill Georgia State, but as someone who got burned when they failed to cover against UTEP last season, I'm a little gun shy.
Pitt lost their OL and their RBs. I don't like Pitt.
Love Mizzou, Wake, Wazzou for all the reasons that you list.. Rutgers is intriguing, and I completely agree with you about UMASS.
Under a month now, starting to look at week 1.. here's what I'm thinking... let's have a discussion... nothing set it stone yet- still some time to figure it out...week 1/2 can always be tricky and can be your opinion vs the sportsbook... situations come out way more as the season unfolds (where most of my bets live)
Week 1
Tulane -3 vs FIU
Even though Tulane only returns 3 O starters, they return QB McMillan who went 5-1 in his 6 starts last year. What I like, especially early on, is Ds are usually ahead of the O. Tulane has 8 starters back, including entire DL that was 16th in the country at Havoc % last year. FIU was 105th in D Eff per S&P and 111th in rush eff D LY- while Tulane was 23rd in the country in rush O LY. Tulane 31-24
Rutgers -14.5 vs UMASS
Somehow I talked myself into this, even with @Iowa next week for the Scarlet Knights. Rutgers came out swinging LY (beat Texas ST by 28) and UMASS might be worst team in FBS. They only return 3 D starters too boot. I just don't see how UMASS scores here... Rutgers- 34-3
VT -2.5 at BC
Feel this will be ver public play as BC loses a ton on both sides of the ball (5 O starters back, 4 D back). BC also replacing entire secondary. VT brings back 8 on D, and even though they sucked vs the run, I'm banking on an improvement with so many people back- including their entire secondary. VT 27-17
Missouri -15 at Wyoming
Tigers return 7 O starters and have Clemson transfer Bryant. Better yet, they return good chunk of their D- Missouri 7th in run eff and Wyoming can't really throw the ball. If they take the game seriously, like WSU did last year- Cowboys get run out... Missouri- 41-17
Tennessee -25.5 vs. Georgia State
Off 5-7 year and less than stellar results against inferior teams, now is the time for a blowout and blowout early. Tenn returns 7 O starters against a GSU team that was 127th in D Eff, 128th in explosive D and 126th in pass eff D LY. No real lookahead for Vols early who score early and often... Tenn 49-10
Also, small leans to Wake -3.5 (Utah St loses a TON from last year), Wash State -33.5(NMSU is 2nd worst team behind UMASS and should score 50) and Pitt +3 (not buying UVA hype just yet)
Thoughts? Comments?
VT is vastly improving this season, both offensively and defensively, they will make a run for the ACC if not win it. BC has lost most of their defense and some of the offense as well.
You said it for the reasons for Missouri winning. Totally agree.
Tennessee had a great offense at times last season, and they should improve on every level this season. They will handle week 1
Under a month now, starting to look at week 1.. here's what I'm thinking... let's have a discussion... nothing set it stone yet- still some time to figure it out...week 1/2 can always be tricky and can be your opinion vs the sportsbook... situations come out way more as the season unfolds (where most of my bets live)
Week 1
Tulane -3 vs FIU
Even though Tulane only returns 3 O starters, they return QB McMillan who went 5-1 in his 6 starts last year. What I like, especially early on, is Ds are usually ahead of the O. Tulane has 8 starters back, including entire DL that was 16th in the country at Havoc % last year. FIU was 105th in D Eff per S&P and 111th in rush eff D LY- while Tulane was 23rd in the country in rush O LY. Tulane 31-24
Rutgers -14.5 vs UMASS
Somehow I talked myself into this, even with @Iowa next week for the Scarlet Knights. Rutgers came out swinging LY (beat Texas ST by 28) and UMASS might be worst team in FBS. They only return 3 D starters too boot. I just don't see how UMASS scores here... Rutgers- 34-3
VT -2.5 at BC
Feel this will be ver public play as BC loses a ton on both sides of the ball (5 O starters back, 4 D back). BC also replacing entire secondary. VT brings back 8 on D, and even though they sucked vs the run, I'm banking on an improvement with so many people back- including their entire secondary. VT 27-17
Missouri -15 at Wyoming
Tigers return 7 O starters and have Clemson transfer Bryant. Better yet, they return good chunk of their D- Missouri 7th in run eff and Wyoming can't really throw the ball. If they take the game seriously, like WSU did last year- Cowboys get run out... Missouri- 41-17
Tennessee -25.5 vs. Georgia State
Off 5-7 year and less than stellar results against inferior teams, now is the time for a blowout and blowout early. Tenn returns 7 O starters against a GSU team that was 127th in D Eff, 128th in explosive D and 126th in pass eff D LY. No real lookahead for Vols early who score early and often... Tenn 49-10
Also, small leans to Wake -3.5 (Utah St loses a TON from last year), Wash State -33.5(NMSU is 2nd worst team behind UMASS and should score 50) and Pitt +3 (not buying UVA hype just yet)
Thoughts? Comments?
VT is vastly improving this season, both offensively and defensively, they will make a run for the ACC if not win it. BC has lost most of their defense and some of the offense as well.
You said it for the reasons for Missouri winning. Totally agree.
Tennessee had a great offense at times last season, and they should improve on every level this season. They will handle week 1
Love Wake...Utah St only returns 2 starters on O...new coach new coordinators...Something people have not talked about is the humidity in WF, North Carolina on August 31, 2019...Utah St does have a solid D and Utah St QB Love is a pro prospect. WF continuity at HC, coordinators, and QB playing at home in a must win situation is enough for me to list WF as my #2 selection of the week. My other potential plays are Rutgers, South Carolina, and Alabama ATS...
Love Wake...Utah St only returns 2 starters on O...new coach new coordinators...Something people have not talked about is the humidity in WF, North Carolina on August 31, 2019...Utah St does have a solid D and Utah St QB Love is a pro prospect. WF continuity at HC, coordinators, and QB playing at home in a must win situation is enough for me to list WF as my #2 selection of the week. My other potential plays are Rutgers, South Carolina, and Alabama ATS...
Looks like you've found that SPORTS ALMANAC...........
* me?......I keep mind cemented deep in my basement....gonna bust it out this year John Wick style...........ha
Like all of those.....Wazzu /Pitt not so much....kinda like Va
Note on Mizzou / Wyo......not a deal breaker / just a factor to consider......esp if a long road trip involved by favorite
* Mizzou in CLASS on 8/19....meaning the hours they can work are restricted (20 hrs/ week it seems?)....more so than Wyo...who starts school 9/4 ...the number of practices are the same
= many more distractions > less focus......BOL buddy......
Humble when ambitious - gracious when successful - resilient when you fail.
Looks like you've found that SPORTS ALMANAC...........
* me?......I keep mind cemented deep in my basement....gonna bust it out this year John Wick style...........ha
Like all of those.....Wazzu /Pitt not so much....kinda like Va
Note on Mizzou / Wyo......not a deal breaker / just a factor to consider......esp if a long road trip involved by favorite
* Mizzou in CLASS on 8/19....meaning the hours they can work are restricted (20 hrs/ week it seems?)....more so than Wyo...who starts school 9/4 ...the number of practices are the same
= many more distractions > less focus......BOL buddy......
Looks like you've found that SPORTS ALMANAC...........
* me?......I keep mind cemented deep in my basement....gonna bust it out this year John Wick style...........ha
Like all of those.....Wazzu /Pitt not so much....kinda like Va
Note on Mizzou / Wyo......not a deal breaker / just a factor to consider......esp if a long road trip involved by favorite
* Mizzou in CLASS on 8/19....meaning the hours they can work are restricted (20 hrs/ week it seems?)....more so than Wyo...who starts school 9/4 ...the number of practices are the same
= many more distractions > less focus......BOL buddy......
Good stuff again BA...I initially liked Mizzou, but with a new QB, and like you said, on the road, with those restrictions, may just mean a WYO cover. No play for me...
Looks like you've found that SPORTS ALMANAC...........
* me?......I keep mind cemented deep in my basement....gonna bust it out this year John Wick style...........ha
Like all of those.....Wazzu /Pitt not so much....kinda like Va
Note on Mizzou / Wyo......not a deal breaker / just a factor to consider......esp if a long road trip involved by favorite
* Mizzou in CLASS on 8/19....meaning the hours they can work are restricted (20 hrs/ week it seems?)....more so than Wyo...who starts school 9/4 ...the number of practices are the same
= many more distractions > less focus......BOL buddy......
Good stuff again BA...I initially liked Mizzou, but with a new QB, and like you said, on the road, with those restrictions, may just mean a WYO cover. No play for me...
VT is vastly improving this season, both offensively and defensively, they will make a run for the ACC if not win it. BC has lost most of their defense and some of the offense as well.
You said it for the reasons for Missouri winning. Totally agree.
Tennessee had a great offense at times last season, and they should improve on every level this season. They will handle week 1
Will see how Bud Foster now retiring moves (if at all) the line and what the kids think.. would thinkthis motivates the D to go super hard early and late? But again, these are kids... would like to read about their mindset before locking in Hokies- and yea, public play, but I'm OK with that in week 1
VT is vastly improving this season, both offensively and defensively, they will make a run for the ACC if not win it. BC has lost most of their defense and some of the offense as well.
You said it for the reasons for Missouri winning. Totally agree.
Tennessee had a great offense at times last season, and they should improve on every level this season. They will handle week 1
Will see how Bud Foster now retiring moves (if at all) the line and what the kids think.. would thinkthis motivates the D to go super hard early and late? But again, these are kids... would like to read about their mindset before locking in Hokies- and yea, public play, but I'm OK with that in week 1
Love Wake...Utah St only returns 2 starters on O...new coach new coordinators...Something people have not talked about is the humidity in WF, North Carolina on August 31, 2019...Utah St does have a solid D and Utah St QB Love is a pro prospect. WF continuity at HC, coordinators, and QB playing at home in a must win situation is enough for me to list WF as my #2 selection of the week. My other potential plays are Rutgers, South Carolina, and Alabama ATS...
Yea, Love is a monster- only thing that's keeping me at bay here... Also Utah St's sneaky good D LY and Wake 116th in explosiveness.. maybe Wake win, but more than a FG becomes dicey?
Love Wake...Utah St only returns 2 starters on O...new coach new coordinators...Something people have not talked about is the humidity in WF, North Carolina on August 31, 2019...Utah St does have a solid D and Utah St QB Love is a pro prospect. WF continuity at HC, coordinators, and QB playing at home in a must win situation is enough for me to list WF as my #2 selection of the week. My other potential plays are Rutgers, South Carolina, and Alabama ATS...
Yea, Love is a monster- only thing that's keeping me at bay here... Also Utah St's sneaky good D LY and Wake 116th in explosiveness.. maybe Wake win, but more than a FG becomes dicey?
Ole Miss installing new O/D, returns only 9 total starters (3 on D).. Ole MIss rush D last year 110th in country while Memphis returns 6 starters on O (including QB) and was 5th in rush O LY... not too keen on laying the points, but PK at home vs SEC bottom feeder Ill bite
Memphis- 38-28
SCe
Same thing here, basic PK with better team (even on neutral field) going against team with newish QB and new systems/coaching staff... early on , I'll trust returning QBs and teams that have fewer unknowns... maybe Cocks blow them out? But at a basic PK, its enough to find out
Ole Miss installing new O/D, returns only 9 total starters (3 on D).. Ole MIss rush D last year 110th in country while Memphis returns 6 starters on O (including QB) and was 5th in rush O LY... not too keen on laying the points, but PK at home vs SEC bottom feeder Ill bite
Memphis- 38-28
SCe
Same thing here, basic PK with better team (even on neutral field) going against team with newish QB and new systems/coaching staff... early on , I'll trust returning QBs and teams that have fewer unknowns... maybe Cocks blow them out? But at a basic PK, its enough to find out
Looked further and ended up playing UVA -2 at Pitt (was in Vegas last week and Circa was only book that didn't have UVA at -2.5 or -3)
Initally leaned Pitt, but then saw how much Pitt lost on offense and even if their new OC wants to throw it, they'll be playing into the hands of one of the best secondary's in the country. Pitt also lost their best D player (DE Weaver) for the year. So I'll ride with the Hoos 27-17
Looked further and ended up playing UVA -2 at Pitt (was in Vegas last week and Circa was only book that didn't have UVA at -2.5 or -3)
Initally leaned Pitt, but then saw how much Pitt lost on offense and even if their new OC wants to throw it, they'll be playing into the hands of one of the best secondary's in the country. Pitt also lost their best D player (DE Weaver) for the year. So I'll ride with the Hoos 27-17
Pitt has been able to FORCE...Va to play THEIR game in the past.....in the trenches
Now it will likely be the opposite...Pitt will probably still be a running / physical team...but PN will no doubt let new OC Whipple throw the ball a lot more.....which plays into the strength of the Cav D
>> Pitt has essentially LOST their identity (2 great RB's/OL)
Virginia has been a TERRIBLE road team under Bronco...only winning FOUR of 17 (9-8 ATS).....3/12 on ACC road (5-7 ATS)
> while Pitt (ACC home) has won 9/12 (8-4 ATS / 6-1 run)
Humble when ambitious - gracious when successful - resilient when you fail.
Pitt has been able to FORCE...Va to play THEIR game in the past.....in the trenches
Now it will likely be the opposite...Pitt will probably still be a running / physical team...but PN will no doubt let new OC Whipple throw the ball a lot more.....which plays into the strength of the Cav D
>> Pitt has essentially LOST their identity (2 great RB's/OL)
Virginia has been a TERRIBLE road team under Bronco...only winning FOUR of 17 (9-8 ATS).....3/12 on ACC road (5-7 ATS)
> while Pitt (ACC home) has won 9/12 (8-4 ATS / 6-1 run)
So Car will win by 2 TD's or more against UNC. Gamecock Defense has greatly improved, and have depth for the first time in a long time. Mack Brown named a true Freshman QB, and I think he'll see a lot of pressure. As a disclaimer, I live in Columbia and see a TON of report on the locals... I think this game is an easy one for SC.
So Car will win by 2 TD's or more against UNC. Gamecock Defense has greatly improved, and have depth for the first time in a long time. Mack Brown named a true Freshman QB, and I think he'll see a lot of pressure. As a disclaimer, I live in Columbia and see a TON of report on the locals... I think this game is an easy one for SC.
So Car will win by 2 TD's or more against UNC. Gamecock Defense has greatly improved, and have depth for the first time in a long time. Mack Brown named a true Freshman QB, and I think he'll see a lot of pressure. As a disclaimer, I live in Columbia and see a TON of report on the locals... I think this game is an easy one for SC.
Line seems to be in agreement with you... Cocks up to -8 right now... would think this continues to climb as we get closer to kick and people realize UNC is starting a frosh QB and installing an entire new system on both sides
So Car will win by 2 TD's or more against UNC. Gamecock Defense has greatly improved, and have depth for the first time in a long time. Mack Brown named a true Freshman QB, and I think he'll see a lot of pressure. As a disclaimer, I live in Columbia and see a TON of report on the locals... I think this game is an easy one for SC.
Line seems to be in agreement with you... Cocks up to -8 right now... would think this continues to climb as we get closer to kick and people realize UNC is starting a frosh QB and installing an entire new system on both sides
Pitt has been able to FORCE...Va to play THEIR game in the past.....in the trenches
Now it will likely be the opposite...Pitt will probably still be a running / physical team...but PN will no doubt let new OC Whipple throw the ball a lot more.....which plays into the strength of the Cav D
>> Pitt has essentially LOST their identity (2 great RB's/OL)
Virginia has been a TERRIBLE road team under Bronco...only winning FOUR of 17 (9-8 ATS).....3/12 on ACC road (5-7 ATS)
> while Pitt (ACC home) has won 9/12 (8-4 ATS / 6-1 run)
I keep waiting for this line to move, and it's not yet... Pitt getting love from winning division last year? others (myself earlier this month), not buying UVA in road game yet?
And maybe you are right on- can this be UVA's time... this is huge game for their division chances... can they actually take the step? I'm betting on yes
Pitt has been able to FORCE...Va to play THEIR game in the past.....in the trenches
Now it will likely be the opposite...Pitt will probably still be a running / physical team...but PN will no doubt let new OC Whipple throw the ball a lot more.....which plays into the strength of the Cav D
>> Pitt has essentially LOST their identity (2 great RB's/OL)
Virginia has been a TERRIBLE road team under Bronco...only winning FOUR of 17 (9-8 ATS).....3/12 on ACC road (5-7 ATS)
> while Pitt (ACC home) has won 9/12 (8-4 ATS / 6-1 run)
I keep waiting for this line to move, and it's not yet... Pitt getting love from winning division last year? others (myself earlier this month), not buying UVA in road game yet?
And maybe you are right on- can this be UVA's time... this is huge game for their division chances... can they actually take the step? I'm betting on yes
This ended up being a bigger week 1 card than I usually play...
Iowa -21.5 vs Miami Oh
Not sure how Miami scores here..and Stanley back for Iowa... even though front 7 more or less new for Iowa, like them to apply pressure to new Miami QB
Iowa 31-6
Indiana vs Ball State, Under 60
Don't see that much scoring here even with IU going back to a more up tempo look.. think they will run the ball quite a bit- something BSU can't stop...
This ended up being a bigger week 1 card than I usually play...
Iowa -21.5 vs Miami Oh
Not sure how Miami scores here..and Stanley back for Iowa... even though front 7 more or less new for Iowa, like them to apply pressure to new Miami QB
Iowa 31-6
Indiana vs Ball State, Under 60
Don't see that much scoring here even with IU going back to a more up tempo look.. think they will run the ball quite a bit- something BSU can't stop...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.