Waste of points teasing thru 0.
Won't be surprised if Arizona gets smoked and Atlanta losses.
shaps: just beware the RAIDERS have been absolute monsters on the road within the division and they are coming off a fantastic come from behind win vs PITTSPURGH. I have posted the trend for Oakland below:
Divisional Road Dogs (since 2009) ATS 9-0, SUP 8-1
shaps: just beware the RAIDERS have been absolute monsters on the road within the division and they are coming off a fantastic come from behind win vs PITTSPURGH. I have posted the trend for Oakland below:
Divisional Road Dogs (since 2009) ATS 9-0, SUP 8-1
PTB: Great job last week way to run and gun my friend.
SAINTS? Talk about ball busting losses. Don't forget that NOR was leading in the 3Q by 18 points in an absolutely must win situation in the toughest place to play in the NFL, well off last year's stats anyways, and managed to score zero points the rest of the way and lose the game in OT. I think we've got two teams off crushing losses. Plus, NOR's defense sucks but what can you say about NOR offense - far from good my friend. Tread lightly!
PTB: Great job last week way to run and gun my friend.
SAINTS? Talk about ball busting losses. Don't forget that NOR was leading in the 3Q by 18 points in an absolutely must win situation in the toughest place to play in the NFL, well off last year's stats anyways, and managed to score zero points the rest of the way and lose the game in OT. I think we've got two teams off crushing losses. Plus, NOR's defense sucks but what can you say about NOR offense - far from good my friend. Tread lightly!
Nice information - thanks!
No Revis, SFR off of a loss, the teams spends a week on the road together. Hmmmm some interesting things to think about.
Nice information - thanks!
No Revis, SFR off of a loss, the teams spends a week on the road together. Hmmmm some interesting things to think about.
Remember, last year BALTIMORE followed up big wins vs PITTSPURGH (twice) and HOUSTON with road losses. Still, I think Ravens have a daunting home record. I agree this is an incredibly flat spot for the Ravens and don't forget the tragic circumstances surrounding T. Smith. I had half a unit on CLEVELAND last week and I have little faith in their aerial attack: Gordon is green, Benjamin and Little have problems catching the ball, and let's face it who knows what you will get from Weeden in such a hostile environment. Last year these teams split vs the numbers with Cleveland covering on the road. I'd feel a lot more confident with Joe Haden in the Browns line up. Slight lean to the Browns with a boat load of points.
Remember, last year BALTIMORE followed up big wins vs PITTSPURGH (twice) and HOUSTON with road losses. Still, I think Ravens have a daunting home record. I agree this is an incredibly flat spot for the Ravens and don't forget the tragic circumstances surrounding T. Smith. I had half a unit on CLEVELAND last week and I have little faith in their aerial attack: Gordon is green, Benjamin and Little have problems catching the ball, and let's face it who knows what you will get from Weeden in such a hostile environment. Last year these teams split vs the numbers with Cleveland covering on the road. I'd feel a lot more confident with Joe Haden in the Browns line up. Slight lean to the Browns with a boat load of points.
Posted: 9/25/2012 5:11:16 PM i was thinking a diff 10 pt teaser, lmk what u think..pats +6 ( noway in hell they lose 3 in a row) sf +6 (worried about this one simply because the jets will have to give it there all to even b close in this one) pack +18 (packers have all this shit going on, noway they'll be even cue, plus ill take drew brees +18 against anyone) let me know what u think, thanks man and good luck! The Pack is -8 big guy. Teasing them would put you @ +2 |
Posted: 9/25/2012 5:11:16 PM i was thinking a diff 10 pt teaser, lmk what u think..pats +6 ( noway in hell they lose 3 in a row) sf +6 (worried about this one simply because the jets will have to give it there all to even b close in this one) pack +18 (packers have all this shit going on, noway they'll be even cue, plus ill take drew brees +18 against anyone) let me know what u think, thanks man and good luck! The Pack is -8 big guy. Teasing them would put you @ +2 |
As for SFR vs the JETS, I was thinking about Bellichick's fantastic ATS record post losing so I checked out how Harbaugh did last year in these situations:
L DAL 24-27
W CIN 13-8
L BAL 6-16
W STL 26-0
L ARZ 19-21
W PIT 20-3
Harbaugh POST LOSS 3-0 ATS but even more interesting all of these games went under the number with SFR allowing a meager 11 points in all of these games combined. I haven't read the STATS for the game but I get the impression they were gouged a little bit on defense last week which makes me think Harbaugh will be spitting fire this week. Revis is out so the OU might be a little bit higher than expected and you know what teams do when they lose a superstar like REVIS they buckle down and concentrate harder and collectively play better. I don't think the JETS offense creates the same problems for SFR as a mobile Ponder, AP running the ball, and an electrifying Harvin. The Jets don't have a blue chip running back and they have the youngest, and one of the weakest, sets of receivers in the league. I gotta HUNCH this thing smells like an under. Jets have gone over the total in 2 of their 3 games but I had half a unit on the under last week and that game should have went under the numbers - sometimes the ball bounces the wrong way. Anyways - GOOD LUCK!
As for SFR vs the JETS, I was thinking about Bellichick's fantastic ATS record post losing so I checked out how Harbaugh did last year in these situations:
L DAL 24-27
W CIN 13-8
L BAL 6-16
W STL 26-0
L ARZ 19-21
W PIT 20-3
Harbaugh POST LOSS 3-0 ATS but even more interesting all of these games went under the number with SFR allowing a meager 11 points in all of these games combined. I haven't read the STATS for the game but I get the impression they were gouged a little bit on defense last week which makes me think Harbaugh will be spitting fire this week. Revis is out so the OU might be a little bit higher than expected and you know what teams do when they lose a superstar like REVIS they buckle down and concentrate harder and collectively play better. I don't think the JETS offense creates the same problems for SFR as a mobile Ponder, AP running the ball, and an electrifying Harvin. The Jets don't have a blue chip running back and they have the youngest, and one of the weakest, sets of receivers in the league. I gotta HUNCH this thing smells like an under. Jets have gone over the total in 2 of their 3 games but I had half a unit on the under last week and that game should have went under the numbers - sometimes the ball bounces the wrong way. Anyways - GOOD LUCK!
As for SFR vs the JETS, I was thinking about Bellichick's fantastic ATS record post losing so I checked out how Harbaugh did last year in these situations:
L DAL 24-27
W CIN 13-8
L BAL 6-16
W STL 26-0
L ARZ 19-21
W PIT 20-3
Harbaugh POST LOSS 3-0 ATS but even more interesting all of these games went under the number with SFR allowing a meager 11 points in all of these games combined. I haven't read the STATS for the game but I get the impression they were gouged a little bit on defense last week which makes me think Harbaugh will be spitting fire this week. Revis is out so the OU might be a little bit higher than expected and you know what teams do when they lose a superstar like REVIS they buckle down and concentrate harder and collectively play better. I don't think the JETS offense creates the same problems for SFR as a mobile Ponder, AP running the ball, and an electrifying Harvin. The Jets don't have a blue chip running back and they have the youngest, and one of the weakest, sets of receivers in the league. I gotta HUNCH this thing smells like an under. Jets have gone over the total in 2 of their 3 games but I had half a unit on the under last week and that game should have went under the numbers - sometimes the ball bounces the wrong way. Anyways - GOOD LUCK!
As for SFR vs the JETS, I was thinking about Bellichick's fantastic ATS record post losing so I checked out how Harbaugh did last year in these situations:
L DAL 24-27
W CIN 13-8
L BAL 6-16
W STL 26-0
L ARZ 19-21
W PIT 20-3
Harbaugh POST LOSS 3-0 ATS but even more interesting all of these games went under the number with SFR allowing a meager 11 points in all of these games combined. I haven't read the STATS for the game but I get the impression they were gouged a little bit on defense last week which makes me think Harbaugh will be spitting fire this week. Revis is out so the OU might be a little bit higher than expected and you know what teams do when they lose a superstar like REVIS they buckle down and concentrate harder and collectively play better. I don't think the JETS offense creates the same problems for SFR as a mobile Ponder, AP running the ball, and an electrifying Harvin. The Jets don't have a blue chip running back and they have the youngest, and one of the weakest, sets of receivers in the league. I gotta HUNCH this thing smells like an under. Jets have gone over the total in 2 of their 3 games but I had half a unit on the under last week and that game should have went under the numbers - sometimes the ball bounces the wrong way. Anyways - GOOD LUCK!
Good Luck prime!!! Wating you get the ravens bet, really curious to see your 5 team parlay!!!
What do you think on the raiders game you think the can win outright?
Good Luck prime!!! Wating you get the ravens bet, really curious to see your 5 team parlay!!!
What do you think on the raiders game you think the can win outright?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.