just got tickets to the SENATORS game tonite, so if the Mets should win game 1.. the play for game 2 will be TO WIN the same amounts as game 1 ..the extra losses from game 1 i will spread over other teams lines...hopefully it wont come to that..
just got tickets to the SENATORS game tonite, so if the Mets should win game 1.. the play for game 2 will be TO WIN the same amounts as game 1 ..the extra losses from game 1 i will spread over other teams lines...hopefully it wont come to that..
Minnesota has lost 3 in a row, so boost souls be a play also, both teams struggling, gonna hold off tonight and just pick up play tomorrow
yup, but Minny Lose is to win 1.33u, Boston lose is to win 2.33u . hence the actual bet is on boston to L for 1u ..but my lines for each team will be updated as if both were bet independently..
Minnesota has lost 3 in a row, so boost souls be a play also, both teams struggling, gonna hold off tonight and just pick up play tomorrow
yup, but Minny Lose is to win 1.33u, Boston lose is to win 2.33u . hence the actual bet is on boston to L for 1u ..but my lines for each team will be updated as if both were bet independently..
Boston lost on the 29th, they should only be a play for oak to lose. As far as the system goes, I have been having some success with it, but I haven't been playing every game, I an using it in conjunction with other systems (Cisco 5 run and dog chase, and now with the rpi system) to come up with plays, I think we should have some filters, especially a bad team filter, for example kc vs. Detroit, I have a hard time taking kc against anyone. I have also been holding off on games where both teams are plays and wait until one of the lines clear, just some thoughts
Boston lost on the 29th, they should only be a play for oak to lose. As far as the system goes, I have been having some success with it, but I haven't been playing every game, I an using it in conjunction with other systems (Cisco 5 run and dog chase, and now with the rpi system) to come up with plays, I think we should have some filters, especially a bad team filter, for example kc vs. Detroit, I have a hard time taking kc against anyone. I have also been holding off on games where both teams are plays and wait until one of the lines clear, just some thoughts
Another example, tonight you have Washington as a play to lose, but if you go back, they are technically a 5th game bet to win in this system, and they are a second game to win in Cisco's 5 run system and a 3rd game to win in his dog chase system. Obviously, in gambling, anything can happen in that game tonight, but according to what some good systems say, Washington is a good bet. Just some things to mull over.
Another example, tonight you have Washington as a play to lose, but if you go back, they are technically a 5th game bet to win in this system, and they are a second game to win in Cisco's 5 run system and a 3rd game to win in his dog chase system. Obviously, in gambling, anything can happen in that game tonight, but according to what some good systems say, Washington is a good bet. Just some things to mull over.
I hear ya Jayray, about betting bad teams.. i cringed betting KC against Verlander today... lol ..thing is, I have to play it the way i backtested it.. In the the end when I backtested, all the lines eventually clear, what I may have underestimated is the number of units required to make this happen, I thought 150 would be more then enough.. not so sure now, may be closer to 200 or 250.. any more thne 250 max, then to me, the system isnt feasible..we will see.
I hear ya Jayray, about betting bad teams.. i cringed betting KC against Verlander today... lol ..thing is, I have to play it the way i backtested it.. In the the end when I backtested, all the lines eventually clear, what I may have underestimated is the number of units required to make this happen, I thought 150 would be more then enough.. not so sure now, may be closer to 200 or 250.. any more thne 250 max, then to me, the system isnt feasible..we will see.
neilsy, just one quick question. Sorry for being lazy to back read the rules. When you say Houston +138 and Houston (SF lose) +138, what does that mean? Does that mean you placed a bet on Houston ML twice? I just don't understand the (lose) thing. Hope you can clear that up. Thanks
neilsy, just one quick question. Sorry for being lazy to back read the rules. When you say Houston +138 and Houston (SF lose) +138, what does that mean? Does that mean you placed a bet on Houston ML twice? I just don't understand the (lose) thing. Hope you can clear that up. Thanks
Basically what it means is that i am playing Houston , because they have won 3 in row.. but i am also playing against San Fran, because they have lost 3 in a row.. so essentially, yes i am betting Houston twice..
Basically what it means is that i am playing Houston , because they have won 3 in row.. but i am also playing against San Fran, because they have lost 3 in a row.. so essentially, yes i am betting Houston twice..
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.