you do realize that you completely ignored the very simple question he asked you? heaven forbid you actually take the time to read what someone said and respond.
My good man. I freely admit that I have done my own personal research on the issue and have made up my mind (unless I see compelling contradicting evidence otherwise) regarding what I believe happened.
If he wants to insist that I (one of the few that have faded the public) am the one who only sees black and white thats his perogotive.
His big talk and his actions are not in line. Show me one instance where he has argued with or pointed out a dumb thing that someone on the other side as me has said.
Is it because all of those guys on the other side are 100% correct?
Is it because he lacks personal integrity to do so? Yes
you do realize that you completely ignored the very simple question he asked you? heaven forbid you actually take the time to read what someone said and respond.
My good man. I freely admit that I have done my own personal research on the issue and have made up my mind (unless I see compelling contradicting evidence otherwise) regarding what I believe happened.
If he wants to insist that I (one of the few that have faded the public) am the one who only sees black and white thats his perogotive.
His big talk and his actions are not in line. Show me one instance where he has argued with or pointed out a dumb thing that someone on the other side as me has said.
Is it because all of those guys on the other side are 100% correct?
Is it because he lacks personal integrity to do so? Yes
I like I said it is like debating with someone that insists that OJ is 100% innocent and they know that because they have followed the facts of the case to prove their initial assumption
I like I said it is like debating with someone that insists that OJ is 100% innocent and they know that because they have followed the facts of the case to prove their initial assumption
Dershowitz went even further in an interview on Fox News Channel’s “Huckabee,” with former Gov. Mike Huckabee, in which he accused Angela Corey of being “aware of most of the evidence in general outline” and said she made “a deliberate, willful, unethical, unprofessional, and illegal decision to withhold that evidence…from the courts and from the affidavit that she filed in support of an overblown second-degree murder prosecution.”
Dershowitz went even further in an interview on Fox News Channel’s “Huckabee,” with former Gov. Mike Huckabee, in which he accused Angela Corey of being “aware of most of the evidence in general outline” and said she made “a deliberate, willful, unethical, unprofessional, and illegal decision to withhold that evidence…from the courts and from the affidavit that she filed in support of an overblown second-degree murder prosecution.”
14, if Zimmerman had just let the police do their jobs Martin would still be alive today as well. I didn't know walking down the street with THC in someone's system justified having someone randomly confront you. I definitely didn't know punching someone is deserving of the death penalty. How do you know it was a sucker punch? We know for sure that Martin just punched Zim with no provocation on Zim's part? Are there witnesses backing this statement? Because if there are then this case should be completely settled already .
Note:
A defendant, under Florida law, loses his "stand your ground" defense if he provoked the encounter — but he retains traditional self-defense if he reasonably believed his life was in danger and his only recourse was to employ deadly force.
14, if Zimmerman had just let the police do their jobs Martin would still be alive today as well. I didn't know walking down the street with THC in someone's system justified having someone randomly confront you. I definitely didn't know punching someone is deserving of the death penalty. How do you know it was a sucker punch? We know for sure that Martin just punched Zim with no provocation on Zim's part? Are there witnesses backing this statement? Because if there are then this case should be completely settled already .
Note:
A defendant, under Florida law, loses his "stand your ground" defense if he provoked the encounter — but he retains traditional self-defense if he reasonably believed his life was in danger and his only recourse was to employ deadly force.
Speaking of doing their job, the New York Times' "reporting" on the case has been generally biased against Zimmerman. It has suggested that if the police had done their job properly the evidence would point to Zimmerman's guilt. Moreover, it included in its reporting an inflammatory item of uncorroborated gossip. This is what it said:
"The reports may give rise to other mysteries as well, including the identity of a woman who called another investigator, less than two full days after the shooting.
The woman refused to identify herself or give any callback numbers, but told the investigator that Mr. Zimmerman "has racist ideologies and that he is fully capable of instigating a confrontation that could have escalated to the point of Zimmerman having to use deadly force."
I think the New York Times should ask itself whether it would have published the contents of a phone call from an unidentified person that made similar inflammatory charges against Trayvon Martin. I believe that the publication of such unsourced gossip—which would be totally inadmissible in any trial—violates the New York Times' own policies. It has some explaining to do.
Speaking of doing their job, the New York Times' "reporting" on the case has been generally biased against Zimmerman. It has suggested that if the police had done their job properly the evidence would point to Zimmerman's guilt. Moreover, it included in its reporting an inflammatory item of uncorroborated gossip. This is what it said:
"The reports may give rise to other mysteries as well, including the identity of a woman who called another investigator, less than two full days after the shooting.
The woman refused to identify herself or give any callback numbers, but told the investigator that Mr. Zimmerman "has racist ideologies and that he is fully capable of instigating a confrontation that could have escalated to the point of Zimmerman having to use deadly force."
I think the New York Times should ask itself whether it would have published the contents of a phone call from an unidentified person that made similar inflammatory charges against Trayvon Martin. I believe that the publication of such unsourced gossip—which would be totally inadmissible in any trial—violates the New York Times' own policies. It has some explaining to do.
I like I said it is like debating with someone that insists that OJ is 100% innocent and they know that because they have followed the facts of the case to prove their initial assumption
You have to post this multiple times and in multiple threads as if you've realized that no one is paying attention to your bullshit like this anymore.
How many more times will you end up posting this same thing which does nothing but further perpetuate your feeling of inadequacy?
Is it possibly because nobody is talking about Sarah Palin or the tea party right now? The two topics that you have memorized your talking points and rhetoric about.
I like I said it is like debating with someone that insists that OJ is 100% innocent and they know that because they have followed the facts of the case to prove their initial assumption
You have to post this multiple times and in multiple threads as if you've realized that no one is paying attention to your bullshit like this anymore.
How many more times will you end up posting this same thing which does nothing but further perpetuate your feeling of inadequacy?
Is it possibly because nobody is talking about Sarah Palin or the tea party right now? The two topics that you have memorized your talking points and rhetoric about.
But it is not the role of a defense lawyer to save the world or the country. His job — his only job — is to get the best result for his client, by all legal and ethical means.
"An advocate, by the sacred duty which he owes his client, knows, in the discharge of that office, but one person in the world, that client and none other . . . Nay, separating even the duties of a patriot from those of an advocate, and casting them, if need be, to the wind, he must go on reckless of the consequences, if his fate it should unhappily be, to involve his country in confusion for his client's protection."
The prosecutor's job is far broader: to do justice to the defendant as well as the alleged victim. As the Supreme Court has said: "The government wins . . . when justice is done."
Let me just say that I love this excerpt. I mentioned the same thing in other threads regarding the prosecution. Even though the honorable djbrow never gave me credit for it.
The prosecution has a responsibility to the defendent to not let a recklessly prosecuted case get to a jury who can issue an equally reckless virdict.
But it is not the role of a defense lawyer to save the world or the country. His job — his only job — is to get the best result for his client, by all legal and ethical means.
"An advocate, by the sacred duty which he owes his client, knows, in the discharge of that office, but one person in the world, that client and none other . . . Nay, separating even the duties of a patriot from those of an advocate, and casting them, if need be, to the wind, he must go on reckless of the consequences, if his fate it should unhappily be, to involve his country in confusion for his client's protection."
The prosecutor's job is far broader: to do justice to the defendant as well as the alleged victim. As the Supreme Court has said: "The government wins . . . when justice is done."
Let me just say that I love this excerpt. I mentioned the same thing in other threads regarding the prosecution. Even though the honorable djbrow never gave me credit for it.
The prosecution has a responsibility to the defendent to not let a recklessly prosecuted case get to a jury who can issue an equally reckless virdict.
WHEN ZIMMERMAN IS FOUND NOT GUILTY. HOW MANY CITIES IN USA DO YOU GUYS THINK WILL HAVE RIOTS IN IT? clearly black people will riot over this in some cities? the news really made a big deal out of it, why because the kid is black???
20 blacks a few weeks after that incident beat up a white man in alabama almost into a coma, but was it on the news very much? NO , i saw 1 article on it in the NY times and that was it. no more story. i bet if 20 whites beat 1 black person up it be all over the news?
why is the news racist for? also after that attack in alabama the black gang was heard saying that is for travon. HOW STUPID ARE SOME OF THOSE PEOPLE, ZIMMERMAN WAS HISPANIC HE IS NOT WHITE
WHEN ZIMMERMAN IS FOUND NOT GUILTY. HOW MANY CITIES IN USA DO YOU GUYS THINK WILL HAVE RIOTS IN IT? clearly black people will riot over this in some cities? the news really made a big deal out of it, why because the kid is black???
20 blacks a few weeks after that incident beat up a white man in alabama almost into a coma, but was it on the news very much? NO , i saw 1 article on it in the NY times and that was it. no more story. i bet if 20 whites beat 1 black person up it be all over the news?
why is the news racist for? also after that attack in alabama the black gang was heard saying that is for travon. HOW STUPID ARE SOME OF THOSE PEOPLE, ZIMMERMAN WAS HISPANIC HE IS NOT WHITE
WHY WAS THIS NEVER MADE NATIONAL NEWS????????????? if the victim here was black it would be all over the news and idiots like jesse jackson and shit and al sharpton would be whining all over it
WHY WAS THIS NEVER MADE NATIONAL NEWS????????????? if the victim here was black it would be all over the news and idiots like jesse jackson and shit and al sharpton would be whining all over it
also after that attack in alabama the black gang was heard saying that
is for travon. HOW STUPID ARE SOME OF THOSE PEOPLE, ZIMMERMAN WAS
HISPANIC HE IS NOT WHITE
there is NO black on white racism ...move along now Obama is Awesome
also after that attack in alabama the black gang was heard saying that
is for travon. HOW STUPID ARE SOME OF THOSE PEOPLE, ZIMMERMAN WAS
HISPANIC HE IS NOT WHITE
there is NO black on white racism ...move along now Obama is Awesome
also after that attack in alabama the black gang was heard saying that is for travon. HOW STUPID ARE SOME OF THOSE PEOPLE, ZIMMERMAN WAS HISPANIC HE IS NOT WHITE
there is NO black on white racism ...move along now Obama is Awesome
THERE IS BLACK ON WHITE CRIME EVERYDAY, the media is just too bias to report it, i bet if 20 kkk people jumped 1 black kid it would be all over the news though????????? but of couse this was 20 spooks jumping a white kid and of course it barely even talked about
also after that attack in alabama the black gang was heard saying that is for travon. HOW STUPID ARE SOME OF THOSE PEOPLE, ZIMMERMAN WAS HISPANIC HE IS NOT WHITE
there is NO black on white racism ...move along now Obama is Awesome
THERE IS BLACK ON WHITE CRIME EVERYDAY, the media is just too bias to report it, i bet if 20 kkk people jumped 1 black kid it would be all over the news though????????? but of couse this was 20 spooks jumping a white kid and of course it barely even talked about
white people should be the last people blacks go after, whites got rid of the native american, im sure whites can wipe out all the blacks in usa if they really wanted to. no slaves? then no blacks?
white people should be the last people blacks go after, whites got rid of the native american, im sure whites can wipe out all the blacks in usa if they really wanted to. no slaves? then no blacks?
You have to post this multiple times and in multiple threads as if you've realized that no one is paying attention to your bullshit like this anymore.
How many more times will you end up posting this same thing which does nothing but further perpetuate your feeling of inadequacy?
Is it possibly because nobody is talking about Sarah Palin or the tea party right now? The two topics that you have memorized your talking points and rhetoric about.
Yet you are making a post about it... Its like you are actually trying prove yourself a liar over and over and over
You have to post this multiple times and in multiple threads as if you've realized that no one is paying attention to your bullshit like this anymore.
How many more times will you end up posting this same thing which does nothing but further perpetuate your feeling of inadequacy?
Is it possibly because nobody is talking about Sarah Palin or the tea party right now? The two topics that you have memorized your talking points and rhetoric about.
Yet you are making a post about it... Its like you are actually trying prove yourself a liar over and over and over
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.