This is just pursuing liberty
by sticking it to the man and avoiding unnecessary government
regulation. There should be no hindrance to politicians taking unlimited
money from whatever group they want. The free market will take care of
any politician that uses money in an inappropriate way because everyone
will boycott them.
He just made millions off his chump followers, and he has a dynasty
to hand off to his son. Why wouldn't he decline a pension he doesn't
need in order to help his family continue to feed from the trough?
I'm fairly confident he'll write another book, or go on a speaking
tour, too, so he'll probably make up plenty of money there, as well.
This is just pursuing liberty
by sticking it to the man and avoiding unnecessary government
regulation. There should be no hindrance to politicians taking unlimited
money from whatever group they want. The free market will take care of
any politician that uses money in an inappropriate way because everyone
will boycott them.
He just made millions off his chump followers, and he has a dynasty
to hand off to his son. Why wouldn't he decline a pension he doesn't
need in order to help his family continue to feed from the trough?
I'm fairly confident he'll write another book, or go on a speaking
tour, too, so he'll probably make up plenty of money there, as well.
So if some clown on mscnbc agrees with his his chief of staff that its
not possible someone is lying here. I guess we all get to pick and
choose who to believe...
Have fun reading through all of this.... "Roll Call found many other instances between 1999 and 2009 where flight dates and
costs listed in House disbursement records appear to match other reimbursements issued to Rep.
Paul, though the public records did not always contain enough information to be certain.9 In
2009, the House began reporting disbursements with far less detail, making it impossible to find
precise information about travel expenses and compare them to other records.10
1 Jonathan Strong, Records Show Ron Paul Trips Paid Twice, Roll Call, February 6, 2012.
2 American Express bill for Ronald E. Paul, closing date October 11, 2000, available at:
So if some clown on mscnbc agrees with his his chief of staff that its
not possible someone is lying here. I guess we all get to pick and
choose who to believe...
Have fun reading through all of this.... "Roll Call found many other instances between 1999 and 2009 where flight dates and
costs listed in House disbursement records appear to match other reimbursements issued to Rep.
Paul, though the public records did not always contain enough information to be certain.9 In
2009, the House began reporting disbursements with far less detail, making it impossible to find
precise information about travel expenses and compare them to other records.10
1 Jonathan Strong, Records Show Ron Paul Trips Paid Twice, Roll Call, February 6, 2012.
2 American Express bill for Ronald E. Paul, closing date October 11, 2000, available at:
excess leverage and hidden markets = fiat currency
gold is the only commonly discussed alternative
As I've said several times, if the rate of which the exchange were at a discount to market prices and those who are ALSO speculating were not rewarded then maybe we have something to discuss.
This is another of those rationalization issues where those complaining about fiat are looking to profit off the inverse and that is very hypocritical.
I also disagree with the results of going on the gold standard aside from the hypocrite gold bug issue.
excess leverage and hidden markets = fiat currency
gold is the only commonly discussed alternative
As I've said several times, if the rate of which the exchange were at a discount to market prices and those who are ALSO speculating were not rewarded then maybe we have something to discuss.
This is another of those rationalization issues where those complaining about fiat are looking to profit off the inverse and that is very hypocritical.
I also disagree with the results of going on the gold standard aside from the hypocrite gold bug issue.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.