Occupy or America??? Occupy or America??
The May Day protests by OccupySF came to a violent conclusion when one of the Occupiers went berserk and started attacking police with bricks, chunks of concrete and then later iron bars, throwing them from the roof of an “occupied” building at the cops below.
Horrifyingly, his aim was off, so instead of hitting the police, he hit a random bystander, who began to bleed profusely. One inch to the right or left, and that brick could have easily killed the victim.
Occupy or America??? Occupy or America??
The May Day protests by OccupySF came to a violent conclusion when one of the Occupiers went berserk and started attacking police with bricks, chunks of concrete and then later iron bars, throwing them from the roof of an “occupied” building at the cops below.
Horrifyingly, his aim was off, so instead of hitting the police, he hit a random bystander, who began to bleed profusely. One inch to the right or left, and that brick could have easily killed the victim.
Hello maintream media??? Do u want to report on Occupy Cleveland Bomb plots?????? Double Standard.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/05/ohio-bomb-plotters-seen-at-occupy-cleveland-protests-video/
Hello maintream media??? Do u want to report on Occupy Cleveland Bomb plots?????? Double Standard.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/05/ohio-bomb-plotters-seen-at-occupy-cleveland-protests-video/
The Occupy movement, IMO is a societal and order disrupting movement created by Communists, to wreak anarchy so they can take over.
If the term “useful idiots” ever had a better example, I’m unaware of it.
These people are disrespectful fools, and in no way even remotely comparable to the Tea Party.
I suspect they’re mostly young and impressionable. They really don’t know how good they have it compared to other geographics and epochs.
The 60s hippies put this crew to shame. They were idealistic, and rejected, for the most part violence. (Bill Ayers being the exception)
Change, IMO, is inevitable. But cannot we now see that change, without a specified articulation of WHAT KIND OF CHANGE, is just unbridled emotion run amok?
I believe these people, I’m sure with some exceptions, are envious, misguided, young people being manipulated by the Socialist elite.
I really wonder what Soros’s motivation is. In reality, I know. He want’s power to control the masses and I’ll bet has a severe Messianic complex.
“Disgrace” immediately comes to mind when I see this lunacy on the news.
The Occupy movement, IMO is a societal and order disrupting movement created by Communists, to wreak anarchy so they can take over.
If the term “useful idiots” ever had a better example, I’m unaware of it.
These people are disrespectful fools, and in no way even remotely comparable to the Tea Party.
I suspect they’re mostly young and impressionable. They really don’t know how good they have it compared to other geographics and epochs.
The 60s hippies put this crew to shame. They were idealistic, and rejected, for the most part violence. (Bill Ayers being the exception)
Change, IMO, is inevitable. But cannot we now see that change, without a specified articulation of WHAT KIND OF CHANGE, is just unbridled emotion run amok?
I believe these people, I’m sure with some exceptions, are envious, misguided, young people being manipulated by the Socialist elite.
I really wonder what Soros’s motivation is. In reality, I know. He want’s power to control the masses and I’ll bet has a severe Messianic complex.
“Disgrace” immediately comes to mind when I see this lunacy on the news.
Obama endorsing Occupy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aH99q2CRNZg
As president, if he was a leader, he could ask for the stop to the violence at Occupy?? But why doesn't he?? He wants the distraction, the chaos.
Obama endorsing Occupy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aH99q2CRNZg
As president, if he was a leader, he could ask for the stop to the violence at Occupy?? But why doesn't he?? He wants the distraction, the chaos.
Obama endorsing Occupy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aH99q2CRNZg
As president, if he was a leader, he could ask for the stop to the violence at Occupy?? But why doesn't he?? He wants the distraction, the chaos.
+15 +16 +17
Obama endorsing Occupy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aH99q2CRNZg
As president, if he was a leader, he could ask for the stop to the violence at Occupy?? But why doesn't he?? He wants the distraction, the chaos.
+15 +16 +17
That guy talking with Hannity lost me when he said the rapes and crimes committed within the Occupy movement were perpetrated by the NYC police by releasing criminals from their custody, and sending them down to the camp to wreak havoc, thereby delegitimizing the movement. That’s believable.
That guy talking with Hannity lost me when he said the rapes and crimes committed within the Occupy movement were perpetrated by the NYC police by releasing criminals from their custody, and sending them down to the camp to wreak havoc, thereby delegitimizing the movement. That’s believable.
Double Standard in the media???
There was no video shown of cars going over the bridge; NBC made it look abandoned. Yet 13,000 people a day travel over that bridge, and the OWS-affiliated suspects allegedly pulled the trigger on what they thought were plastic explosives that would've destroyed the bridge and killed occupants during rush hour. Still, Williams claimed "there was never any real danger associated with the plan."
Well, that might have something to do with the FBI giving the men dummy explosives. Were it not for that, NBC's beloved Dear Leader would've been bumped to the second slot on this "historic day" and dozens of Americans would've become innocent victims of the Occupy Wall Street movement, beloved by the left and supported by countless Democrat politicians.
The background of the accused terrorists was well known by the time NBC went on air; in fact, Tuesday night they did a special West Coast Edition of Nightly News, so they had extra time to research this. They knew these men were with OWS and chose not to report that very relevant fact. Who these people are and what motivates them does matter.
This is a case of even more selective editing by NBC. Are we sure they fired the person who edited that George Zimmerman audio tape?
Double Standard in the media???
There was no video shown of cars going over the bridge; NBC made it look abandoned. Yet 13,000 people a day travel over that bridge, and the OWS-affiliated suspects allegedly pulled the trigger on what they thought were plastic explosives that would've destroyed the bridge and killed occupants during rush hour. Still, Williams claimed "there was never any real danger associated with the plan."
Well, that might have something to do with the FBI giving the men dummy explosives. Were it not for that, NBC's beloved Dear Leader would've been bumped to the second slot on this "historic day" and dozens of Americans would've become innocent victims of the Occupy Wall Street movement, beloved by the left and supported by countless Democrat politicians.
The background of the accused terrorists was well known by the time NBC went on air; in fact, Tuesday night they did a special West Coast Edition of Nightly News, so they had extra time to research this. They knew these men were with OWS and chose not to report that very relevant fact. Who these people are and what motivates them does matter.
This is a case of even more selective editing by NBC. Are we sure they fired the person who edited that George Zimmerman audio tape?
Chilean Terroist group given center stage at Occupy
On May 1st, at Union Sqare in New York, the organizers of Occupy had set up a stage for their invited speakers to speak to the assembled gaggle of malcontents and totalitarians known as "Occupy" (for example, I saw the flags of Red China, Venezuela, Cuba and others--but no American flags). At one point a group took to the stage, started screaming in spanish and displayed a red and black flag with white letters spelling "MIR."
Chilean Terroist group given center stage at Occupy
On May 1st, at Union Sqare in New York, the organizers of Occupy had set up a stage for their invited speakers to speak to the assembled gaggle of malcontents and totalitarians known as "Occupy" (for example, I saw the flags of Red China, Venezuela, Cuba and others--but no American flags). At one point a group took to the stage, started screaming in spanish and displayed a red and black flag with white letters spelling "MIR."
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.