birdiman, that's what I was trying to get at.
You can never backtrack this system because the rankings are constantly changing.
If you're using rankings from this season, it doesn't make any sense whatsoever to base your plays on such limited info.
I question the rankings, do you really believe KC is likely to win 2/3 games on the road against any team considering they've been one of the worst teams in baseball and have only won once in Toronto since 2007 (and I was at that game against Greinke).
BOL with your plays though ![]()
THATS right I did go back every day every game the numbers change... it was quite interesting to see how they rank... they go up and down even if they dont play a game the day before... I am not saying that they are valid... but based on Nabil's suggestion... that is what I came up with based on this season ALONE.
If you're using rankings from this season, it doesn't make any sense whatsoever to base your plays on such limited info.
I question the rankings, do you really believe KC is likely to win 2/3 games on the road against any team considering they've been one of the worst teams in baseball and have only won once in Toronto since 2007 (and I was at that game against Greinke).
BOL with your plays though ![]()
THATS right I did go back every day every game the numbers change... it was quite interesting to see how they rank... they go up and down even if they dont play a game the day before... I am not saying that they are valid... but based on Nabil's suggestion... that is what I came up with based on this season ALONE.
Now for the NL stats based on the 1st four series alone in 2010 EVERYDAY EVERY GAME STATS... BASED ON NABIL FORMULA
NL
to date:
Teams rated higher in the NL have won 11-11-1 in series one; 12-12 in series 2; 13-12 in series 3 and 14-10 in series 4. Not good odds here.
Teams playing each other with a differential of 5 or more as Nabil states have won 5 out of 13 games 38% winners (Losses series 1 PHI (102.7)@WAS(96.7); series 3 Pit (95.2)@SF (102.5), CIN (103.3)@FLA(98.3), WAS (96.6) @PHI (103.7), MIL (95.4)@ CHC (104.1), NYM (93.9) @ COL (103.2), and AZ (96.7)@ LAD (103.5); series 4 COL (96.9)@ATL (102.2)
Interesting.... diff between AL and NL hey Nabil... Wonder how this will pan out when InterLeague play begins...
Double check my work guys if you gots the time... took me a few hours..
Now for the NL stats based on the 1st four series alone in 2010 EVERYDAY EVERY GAME STATS... BASED ON NABIL FORMULA
NL
to date:
Teams rated higher in the NL have won 11-11-1 in series one; 12-12 in series 2; 13-12 in series 3 and 14-10 in series 4. Not good odds here.
Teams playing each other with a differential of 5 or more as Nabil states have won 5 out of 13 games 38% winners (Losses series 1 PHI (102.7)@WAS(96.7); series 3 Pit (95.2)@SF (102.5), CIN (103.3)@FLA(98.3), WAS (96.6) @PHI (103.7), MIL (95.4)@ CHC (104.1), NYM (93.9) @ COL (103.2), and AZ (96.7)@ LAD (103.5); series 4 COL (96.9)@ATL (102.2)
Interesting.... diff between AL and NL hey Nabil... Wonder how this will pan out when InterLeague play begins...
Double check my work guys if you gots the time... took me a few hours..
Oh yeah... SO....Nabil claims 70% winners...
Combine AL and NL stats I have listed... I get .......drumroll
......... 15 -16 for games with 5 point differential 48% .......
Please follow at your own risk...
Oh yeah... SO....Nabil claims 70% winners...
Combine AL and NL stats I have listed... I get .......drumroll
......... 15 -16 for games with 5 point differential 48% .......
Please follow at your own risk...
Now for the NL stats based on the 1st four series alone in 2010 EVERYDAY EVERY GAME STATS... BASED ON NABIL FORMULA
NL
to date:
Teams rated higher in the NL have won 11-11-1 in series one; 12-12 in series 2; 13-12 in series 3 and 14-10 in series 4. Not good odds here.
Teams playing each other with a differential of 5 or more as Nabil states have won 5 out of 13 games 38% winners (Losses series 1 PHI (102.7)@WAS(96.7); series 3 Pit (95.2)@SF (102.5), CIN (103.3)@FLA(98.3), WAS (96.6) @PHI (103.7), MIL (95.4)@ CHC (104.1), NYM (93.9) @ COL (103.2), and AZ (96.7)@ LAD (103.5); series 4 COL (96.9)@ATL (102.2)
Interesting.... diff between AL and NL hey Nabil... Wonder how this will pan out when InterLeague play begins...
Double check my work guys if you gots the time... took me a few hours..
Using teams with a power rating advantage of 5.00 is a first step in the process and not the whole process
I have repeated many times over, over and over again : cap the games
The idea here is to isolate games worthy of further investigations. There are 15 games to cap. All you have to do is cap them and focus on the best ones.
If you blindly bet on KC last night without capping the game, without taking into consideration the pitching matchup, sorry for your loss
If you paid attention to the comments I made, you will notice that I said I would bet on Oakland last Saturday (they won) and I would not bet on KC last night (they lost)
Do your homework.
Now for the NL stats based on the 1st four series alone in 2010 EVERYDAY EVERY GAME STATS... BASED ON NABIL FORMULA
NL
to date:
Teams rated higher in the NL have won 11-11-1 in series one; 12-12 in series 2; 13-12 in series 3 and 14-10 in series 4. Not good odds here.
Teams playing each other with a differential of 5 or more as Nabil states have won 5 out of 13 games 38% winners (Losses series 1 PHI (102.7)@WAS(96.7); series 3 Pit (95.2)@SF (102.5), CIN (103.3)@FLA(98.3), WAS (96.6) @PHI (103.7), MIL (95.4)@ CHC (104.1), NYM (93.9) @ COL (103.2), and AZ (96.7)@ LAD (103.5); series 4 COL (96.9)@ATL (102.2)
Interesting.... diff between AL and NL hey Nabil... Wonder how this will pan out when InterLeague play begins...
Double check my work guys if you gots the time... took me a few hours..
Using teams with a power rating advantage of 5.00 is a first step in the process and not the whole process
I have repeated many times over, over and over again : cap the games
The idea here is to isolate games worthy of further investigations. There are 15 games to cap. All you have to do is cap them and focus on the best ones.
If you blindly bet on KC last night without capping the game, without taking into consideration the pitching matchup, sorry for your loss
If you paid attention to the comments I made, you will notice that I said I would bet on Oakland last Saturday (they won) and I would not bet on KC last night (they lost)
Do your homework.
After viewing the rankings, it looks like they are calculated and posted daily. If so, would it not be helpful to re-examine these rankings on a daily basis, within a series to identify the most desirable games.
Example: Everyone was posting about KC being a good play in TOR last night. KC was a loser, so their power ranking has changed. Now the KC road ranking is 100.1 and the TOR home ranking is 97.3, giving KC an advantage of 2.8.... this is no longer a favorable matchup, correct?
I am not trying to poke holes in the system, I am just trying to get a better understanding of the way it operates. I think it has some valid points, I am just trying to understand them better.
Thanks for putting you idea out here, I'm interested in seeing how it goes. ![]()
There is a lot of volatility in the power ratings right now because the season has just started.
As the season moves forward, the power ratings will settle down and you won't notice sharp variations from one day to another.
After viewing the rankings, it looks like they are calculated and posted daily. If so, would it not be helpful to re-examine these rankings on a daily basis, within a series to identify the most desirable games.
Example: Everyone was posting about KC being a good play in TOR last night. KC was a loser, so their power ranking has changed. Now the KC road ranking is 100.1 and the TOR home ranking is 97.3, giving KC an advantage of 2.8.... this is no longer a favorable matchup, correct?
I am not trying to poke holes in the system, I am just trying to get a better understanding of the way it operates. I think it has some valid points, I am just trying to understand them better.
Thanks for putting you idea out here, I'm interested in seeing how it goes. ![]()
There is a lot of volatility in the power ratings right now because the season has just started.
As the season moves forward, the power ratings will settle down and you won't notice sharp variations from one day to another.
Here is my suggestion to all of you, guys
Figuring out teams with an advantage of 5.00 or better is the easy part. You can also get a listing of all the probable pitchers for the series involving teams with an advantage
On Thursday, I will list all the games right here and you are all invited to list the games you like.
You will see how well this approach works.
Here is my suggestion to all of you, guys
Figuring out teams with an advantage of 5.00 or better is the easy part. You can also get a listing of all the probable pitchers for the series involving teams with an advantage
On Thursday, I will list all the games right here and you are all invited to list the games you like.
You will see how well this approach works.
Yes, you are correct. KC is the play today
However, the general idea is to cap all the games and focus on the best plays so that we can weed out the expected losses.
As I do appreciate your Sympathy to my loss, I thought I saw you told a few that KC IS the play, but cap yourself... I am not blaming you bro...just did my own homework for the first few series of the 2010 season.
I commented the way I did because there was only one series this season that fit your system... that would be the 3rd series for SF/Pitt SF was 101.7 and Pitt was 95.8 SF won the series 2-1. I didnt see any other first game of the series greater than 5 besides that one...
Lookin at today games myself....
Yes, you are correct. KC is the play today
However, the general idea is to cap all the games and focus on the best plays so that we can weed out the expected losses.
As I do appreciate your Sympathy to my loss, I thought I saw you told a few that KC IS the play, but cap yourself... I am not blaming you bro...just did my own homework for the first few series of the 2010 season.
I commented the way I did because there was only one series this season that fit your system... that would be the 3rd series for SF/Pitt SF was 101.7 and Pitt was 95.8 SF won the series 2-1. I didnt see any other first game of the series greater than 5 besides that one...
Lookin at today games myself....
As I do appreciate your Sympathy to my loss, I thought I saw you told a few that KC IS the play, but cap yourself... I am not blaming you bro...just did my own homework for the first few series of the 2010 season.
I commented the way I did because there was only one series this season that fit your system... that would be the 3rd series for SF/Pitt SF was 101.7 and Pitt was 95.8 SF won the series 2-1. I didnt see any other first game of the series greater than 5 besides that one...
Lookin at today games myself....
Dude ! If you are going to get this emotional over a loss, you may want to consider another venture. Gambling may not be for you
You seem to have disregarded a key word in the comment you just posted and the word is : HOWEVER
Also, why aren't you posting comments I made which clearly indicates that I was not going to bet on KC last night ?
.
As I do appreciate your Sympathy to my loss, I thought I saw you told a few that KC IS the play, but cap yourself... I am not blaming you bro...just did my own homework for the first few series of the 2010 season.
I commented the way I did because there was only one series this season that fit your system... that would be the 3rd series for SF/Pitt SF was 101.7 and Pitt was 95.8 SF won the series 2-1. I didnt see any other first game of the series greater than 5 besides that one...
Lookin at today games myself....
Dude ! If you are going to get this emotional over a loss, you may want to consider another venture. Gambling may not be for you
You seem to have disregarded a key word in the comment you just posted and the word is : HOWEVER
Also, why aren't you posting comments I made which clearly indicates that I was not going to bet on KC last night ?
.
Again, bet on KC if you think the pitching matchup is favorable to them. If not, wait for a better day
Here I will tell you what I like today
I am betting on Minnesota, the best game of the 5 possible games today
Again, bet on KC if you think the pitching matchup is favorable to them. If not, wait for a better day
Here I will tell you what I like today
I am betting on Minnesota, the best game of the 5 possible games today
As I do appreciate your Sympathy to my loss, I thought I saw you told a few that KC IS the play, but cap yourself... I am not blaming you bro...just did my own homework for the first few series of the 2010 season.
I commented the way I did because there was only one series this season that fit your system... that would be the 3rd series for SF/Pitt SF was 101.7 and Pitt was 95.8 SF won the series 2-1. I didnt see any other first game of the series greater than 5 besides that one...
Lookin at today games myself....
Bet on Minnesota. You won't regret it
And I am not using the word HOWEVER here
As I do appreciate your Sympathy to my loss, I thought I saw you told a few that KC IS the play, but cap yourself... I am not blaming you bro...just did my own homework for the first few series of the 2010 season.
I commented the way I did because there was only one series this season that fit your system... that would be the 3rd series for SF/Pitt SF was 101.7 and Pitt was 95.8 SF won the series 2-1. I didnt see any other first game of the series greater than 5 besides that one...
Lookin at today games myself....
Bet on Minnesota. You won't regret it
And I am not using the word HOWEVER here
Emotional.... who is getting emotional.
I am neutral here... just being skeptical of what people post... I know some peeps on here are lazy and just bet what other people tell them to bet... or what people post...
I took KC for my own reasons...and liked that we were on the same side.... I read everything you wrote... "KC is the play" "TB is the play" "Cap yourself" "I am not betting KC"... read it all.
I am eager to see how this all pans out... Relax...I am not a hater... just being skeptical ...Did i not post anything that was not True???? Please tell me and I will retract my whatever I said that was not true...
![]()
Emotional.... who is getting emotional.
I am neutral here... just being skeptical of what people post... I know some peeps on here are lazy and just bet what other people tell them to bet... or what people post...
I took KC for my own reasons...and liked that we were on the same side.... I read everything you wrote... "KC is the play" "TB is the play" "Cap yourself" "I am not betting KC"... read it all.
I am eager to see how this all pans out... Relax...I am not a hater... just being skeptical ...Did i not post anything that was not True???? Please tell me and I will retract my whatever I said that was not true...
![]()
Good luck to you too
Can't go wrong with Minnesota tonight
Good luck to you too
Can't go wrong with Minnesota tonight
Nabil,
It's hard for me to pull the trigger on MINN as well as the Indians are throwing the ball right now. A lot of chalk in that game for my tastes. That being said, best of luck to yourself and the rest of the brothers on the Twins tonight. ![]()
Looking at your system, I personally like Florida at Houston as a pretty favorable matchup tonight, laying only -108. I also like Pitt +115. I think, (again using your criteria) that Thursday's Tampa Bay game might be a must play with Shields on the mound against Chicago's Peavy.
Am I somewhere in the ballpark on what you are thinking here?
I also like the Bravos tonight. Although there is a lot of chalk to be laid, the Phil's bats have been quiet of late and Kendrick is "the worst"... like a stinky old Bojangle's sausage biscuit.
I dunno, if I was really good at this, I wouldn't have to work for a living, would I?
Nabil,
It's hard for me to pull the trigger on MINN as well as the Indians are throwing the ball right now. A lot of chalk in that game for my tastes. That being said, best of luck to yourself and the rest of the brothers on the Twins tonight. ![]()
Looking at your system, I personally like Florida at Houston as a pretty favorable matchup tonight, laying only -108. I also like Pitt +115. I think, (again using your criteria) that Thursday's Tampa Bay game might be a must play with Shields on the mound against Chicago's Peavy.
Am I somewhere in the ballpark on what you are thinking here?
I also like the Bravos tonight. Although there is a lot of chalk to be laid, the Phil's bats have been quiet of late and Kendrick is "the worst"... like a stinky old Bojangle's sausage biscuit.
I dunno, if I was really good at this, I wouldn't have to work for a living, would I?
Nabil,
It's hard for me to pull the trigger on MINN as well as the Indians are throwing the ball right now. A lot of chalk in that game for my tastes. That being said, best of luck to yourself and the rest of the brothers on the Twins tonight. ![]()
Looking at your system, I personally like Florida at Houston as a pretty favorable matchup tonight, laying only -108. I also like Pitt +115. I think, (again using your criteria) that Thursday's Tampa Bay game might be a must play with Shields on the mound against Chicago's Peavy.
Am I somewhere in the ballpark on what you are thinking here?
I also like the Bravos tonight. Although there is a lot of chalk to be laid, the Phil's bats have been quiet of late and Kendrick is "the worst"... like a stinky old Bojangle's sausage biscuit.
I dunno, if I was really good at this, I wouldn't have to work for a living, would I?
I agree with your comment regarding the ML. A lot of chalk
That is why I bet Minnesota -1
The odds : -106
Almost even money
Nabil,
It's hard for me to pull the trigger on MINN as well as the Indians are throwing the ball right now. A lot of chalk in that game for my tastes. That being said, best of luck to yourself and the rest of the brothers on the Twins tonight. ![]()
Looking at your system, I personally like Florida at Houston as a pretty favorable matchup tonight, laying only -108. I also like Pitt +115. I think, (again using your criteria) that Thursday's Tampa Bay game might be a must play with Shields on the mound against Chicago's Peavy.
Am I somewhere in the ballpark on what you are thinking here?
I also like the Bravos tonight. Although there is a lot of chalk to be laid, the Phil's bats have been quiet of late and Kendrick is "the worst"... like a stinky old Bojangle's sausage biscuit.
I dunno, if I was really good at this, I wouldn't have to work for a living, would I?
I agree with your comment regarding the ML. A lot of chalk
That is why I bet Minnesota -1
The odds : -106
Almost even money
tell me how your system works Nabil ?
yesterday which play you took ?
I played KC but lost
which teams have you played yesterday ?
and tonight which team you will play ?
thks
tell me how your system works Nabil ?
yesterday which play you took ?
I played KC but lost
which teams have you played yesterday ?
and tonight which team you will play ?
thks
tell me how your system works Nabil ?
yesterday which play you took ?
I played KC but lost
which teams have you played yesterday ?
and tonight which team you will play ?
thks
There is a detailed description of the approach (hate the word system) on the first page. Easy to follow
The idea is to identify teams with an advantage of 5.00 or better, cap all the games in the series (15 games in this particular case) and focus on the best plays.
My top play for tonight : Minnesota -1
tell me how your system works Nabil ?
yesterday which play you took ?
I played KC but lost
which teams have you played yesterday ?
and tonight which team you will play ?
thks
There is a detailed description of the approach (hate the word system) on the first page. Easy to follow
The idea is to identify teams with an advantage of 5.00 or better, cap all the games in the series (15 games in this particular case) and focus on the best plays.
My top play for tonight : Minnesota -1
Let's just hope the jinx god is on vacation
Let's just hope the jinx god is on vacation
ok minesota seems to be a good play cause poweer rat = 5.5 ( 101.8 - 96.3)
But tampa bay seemsto be good too but the best pitcher shield will be on the mound thursday so its a play for thursday.
Minesota - 1 cause much wining teams win by +1 points.
ok minesota seems to be a good play cause poweer rat = 5.5 ( 101.8 - 96.3)
But tampa bay seemsto be good too but the best pitcher shield will be on the mound thursday so its a play for thursday.
Minesota - 1 cause much wining teams win by +1 points.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.