pandor's box? seems like a foxnews issue to get the crazies fired up on a slow obama day or when taking a break from biblethumping g*y hating indoctrination.
What you don't understand in a 1 person either sex toilet.1 commode, 1 sink, not a multiple unisex bathroom.![]()
What you don't understand in a 1 person either sex toilet.1 commode, 1 sink, not a multiple unisex bathroom.![]()
What you don't understand in a 1 person either sex toilet.1 commode, 1 sink, not a multiple unisex bathroom.![]()
What you don't understand in a 1 person either sex toilet.1 commode, 1 sink, not a multiple unisex bathroom.![]()
Here is our correspondence so far, with my newest comments mixed in, in red.
Post 1 Me: Introducing a topic that was not getting enough attention.
Post 2 DL: Asking who I am and asking what my solution for this issue is, and demonizing me, by saying that I am a whining shtick who only cut and paste.
Post 3: Me: Asking for clarification for what you mean by “solution.” The bill in the link I provided is seeking to change current policy, which I think is unnecessary: If one has a penis he uses a male bathroom and if one has a vagina, she uses the female bathroom, as is and has been universal practice. Thus, your demand for a “solution” is equivalent to asking, “what’s your solution to the fact that the sun is too far away from the earth?” I reject the premise: the sun is not too far from the earth; likewise, there is no “problem” with our current public bathroom policy.
I then asked you if you think allowing kids to “choose” their gender was a good thing.
Post 5 Me: Explaining why I chose Pandora’s box as my title, and again asking if you think “choosing” gender was a good thing.
Post 6 DL: You asking, “So what do you do with women who are not comfortable with a transgendered female to male that looks male walking through the women's restroom? most females react in fear or anger if there is someone that looks, dresses like and talks like a male in the female restroom..
what is your solution?
-Not answering my questions from the previous two posts, and again asking, “what is your solution?” It is impossible for me to give a solution when I don’t have an issue with the current situation.
-If the situation were reversed, and we allowed students to “choose” their bathroom, my solution would be to have people with penises use male bathrooms and people with vaginas use female restrooms. If I felt there were a need for a solution or unhappy with the current issues it would be easy for me to provide what I think would be a viable solution.
Post 8 DL: Answering my question with a question, and saying that parents can "choose" gender…like if a kid says they want to be a certain gender and instead the parents choose a gender for them... Its that a good idea? “No one can choose his/her gender, as one has different DNA strands which make one either male or female.
I personally believe that kids are not at an age where their identity is formed yet “You are either born with male or female reproductive organs, period.”... but I dont not think that my personal beliefs need to be imposed on society in a totalitarian manner as if I want a dictatorship that demands that things be the way I see fit... “Unsure what you’re saying. Being male or female is not imposing any belief on anyone”
Like I am personally pro-life, but I do not think that my personal view on the issue must become law for everyone in every situation... I guess I believe in freedoms to make personal choices, with personal accountability and face the consequences of the choices and options.... Its a less of a Big Intrusive government approach... “Ok”
Post 9 DL: its interesting how hate, fear, scapegoating, bigotry, hate, anger are the foundation and unifying factor certain types of people.... “Pure demonization…attacking opponents rather than debating them. And you claim I injected partisan nonsense into this?”
alot of it to me is to try to increase intrusiveness and regulation of others and point the finger outward rather than looking at personal accountability and responsibility and taking a quiet moment to look inward introspectively through prayer or spiritual connectedness to a higher power...”Ok”
Post 10 Me: Trying my best to answer your question regarding a “solution” in which I see no problem that requires one:
To me, it's really this simple: If a person has a penis, he uses a male bathroom; if a person has a vagina, she uses a female bathroom, irrespective of the way one dresses, acts, or feels. I don't think we should uproot the entirety of public bathroom policy because of an extremely small minority of people who feel confused and attempt "sex changes" (one cannot biologically change his/her male/female nature, although one can mutilate ).
Me then asking two questions: Again you are against the current state so the solution needs to be proposed by you.
Besides, what logic suggests that, since women feel uncomfortable on the rare occasion a male enters their bathroom, we should therefore let all males enter the female bathroom by eradicating distinctions?
And thus I restate my original question: do you think allowing students to "choose" their gender identity is a good idea?
Here is our correspondence so far, with my newest comments mixed in, in red.
Post 1 Me: Introducing a topic that was not getting enough attention.
Post 2 DL: Asking who I am and asking what my solution for this issue is, and demonizing me, by saying that I am a whining shtick who only cut and paste.
Post 3: Me: Asking for clarification for what you mean by “solution.” The bill in the link I provided is seeking to change current policy, which I think is unnecessary: If one has a penis he uses a male bathroom and if one has a vagina, she uses the female bathroom, as is and has been universal practice. Thus, your demand for a “solution” is equivalent to asking, “what’s your solution to the fact that the sun is too far away from the earth?” I reject the premise: the sun is not too far from the earth; likewise, there is no “problem” with our current public bathroom policy.
I then asked you if you think allowing kids to “choose” their gender was a good thing.
Post 5 Me: Explaining why I chose Pandora’s box as my title, and again asking if you think “choosing” gender was a good thing.
Post 6 DL: You asking, “So what do you do with women who are not comfortable with a transgendered female to male that looks male walking through the women's restroom? most females react in fear or anger if there is someone that looks, dresses like and talks like a male in the female restroom..
what is your solution?
-Not answering my questions from the previous two posts, and again asking, “what is your solution?” It is impossible for me to give a solution when I don’t have an issue with the current situation.
-If the situation were reversed, and we allowed students to “choose” their bathroom, my solution would be to have people with penises use male bathrooms and people with vaginas use female restrooms. If I felt there were a need for a solution or unhappy with the current issues it would be easy for me to provide what I think would be a viable solution.
Post 8 DL: Answering my question with a question, and saying that parents can "choose" gender…like if a kid says they want to be a certain gender and instead the parents choose a gender for them... Its that a good idea? “No one can choose his/her gender, as one has different DNA strands which make one either male or female.
I personally believe that kids are not at an age where their identity is formed yet “You are either born with male or female reproductive organs, period.”... but I dont not think that my personal beliefs need to be imposed on society in a totalitarian manner as if I want a dictatorship that demands that things be the way I see fit... “Unsure what you’re saying. Being male or female is not imposing any belief on anyone”
Like I am personally pro-life, but I do not think that my personal view on the issue must become law for everyone in every situation... I guess I believe in freedoms to make personal choices, with personal accountability and face the consequences of the choices and options.... Its a less of a Big Intrusive government approach... “Ok”
Post 9 DL: its interesting how hate, fear, scapegoating, bigotry, hate, anger are the foundation and unifying factor certain types of people.... “Pure demonization…attacking opponents rather than debating them. And you claim I injected partisan nonsense into this?”
alot of it to me is to try to increase intrusiveness and regulation of others and point the finger outward rather than looking at personal accountability and responsibility and taking a quiet moment to look inward introspectively through prayer or spiritual connectedness to a higher power...”Ok”
Post 10 Me: Trying my best to answer your question regarding a “solution” in which I see no problem that requires one:
To me, it's really this simple: If a person has a penis, he uses a male bathroom; if a person has a vagina, she uses a female bathroom, irrespective of the way one dresses, acts, or feels. I don't think we should uproot the entirety of public bathroom policy because of an extremely small minority of people who feel confused and attempt "sex changes" (one cannot biologically change his/her male/female nature, although one can mutilate ).
Me then asking two questions: Again you are against the current state so the solution needs to be proposed by you.
Besides, what logic suggests that, since women feel uncomfortable on the rare occasion a male enters their bathroom, we should therefore let all males enter the female bathroom by eradicating distinctions?
And thus I restate my original question: do you think allowing students to "choose" their gender identity is a good idea?
Post 11 DL:
I will answer your question... I dont think students choosing or having having their gender identity chosen for them is a good idea... To which I replied: Do you recognize the biological fact that gender is inherent, not chosen? Thus, any language suggesting "choice" about gender is a farce.
so help me understand your "solution"
“Again impossible for me to answer when I agree with the current situation”
when a female to male transgendered person enters a ladies room, you are telling the women to simply tolerate having a person that looks like and acts like man in the ladies room? “Yes”
should the women have the right to question the person female to male transgendered person that looks like and acts like a man? “Of course”
if not, what if a man just enters the restroom, should they not question that individual because in your solution they are required to be all PC about it? “ I agreed with the above question so this does not apply”
help me understand your solution that you propose for this occurrence.... Im not sure exactly what your proposed solution is
“Again impossible for me to answer when I agree with the current situation, so no solution can be provided
Post:12 Me: stating what I have said above, and asking why you feel there needs to be a solution.
Post 17: DL: you respond to my last post that no solution is needed.
The premise is reality... this happens... that is reality...
Yes, female transgenders use female bathrooms, and the sun is also far away from the earth…
so what is your solution other than denying reality?
For the 8th time in this article, no solution is needed.
Post 11 DL:
I will answer your question... I dont think students choosing or having having their gender identity chosen for them is a good idea... To which I replied: Do you recognize the biological fact that gender is inherent, not chosen? Thus, any language suggesting "choice" about gender is a farce.
so help me understand your "solution"
“Again impossible for me to answer when I agree with the current situation”
when a female to male transgendered person enters a ladies room, you are telling the women to simply tolerate having a person that looks like and acts like man in the ladies room? “Yes”
should the women have the right to question the person female to male transgendered person that looks like and acts like a man? “Of course”
if not, what if a man just enters the restroom, should they not question that individual because in your solution they are required to be all PC about it? “ I agreed with the above question so this does not apply”
help me understand your solution that you propose for this occurrence.... Im not sure exactly what your proposed solution is
“Again impossible for me to answer when I agree with the current situation, so no solution can be provided
Post:12 Me: stating what I have said above, and asking why you feel there needs to be a solution.
Post 17: DL: you respond to my last post that no solution is needed.
The premise is reality... this happens... that is reality...
Yes, female transgenders use female bathrooms, and the sun is also far away from the earth…
so what is your solution other than denying reality?
For the 8th time in this article, no solution is needed.
Post 18: You again asking me for a solution:
Post 20: Me stating that the burden of proof is on you to find a solution because I am currently happy where we are at. I bring up the point that the left is behind this agenda.
The answer is there have always been a few people in society who have felt confused about their gender, yet it was never an issue until now, when the left decided it needed to be an issue. Well, I disagree with the left's premise. It remains a non-issue. And that brings me precisely to the problem with leftism: It's always seeking some change; it thrives on invented crises. If we were to eliminate separate public bathrooms tomorrow, some other thing that's currently a non-issue the left would make an issue.
Me asking another main point about this bill about how students can play on the gender side they want to.
And realize, too, we have not even addressed the other facet of this topic: that not only would separate bathrooms be effectively eliminated, but men and women would be interchangeable on sports teams. Is that a good idea?
Post 18: You again asking me for a solution:
Post 20: Me stating that the burden of proof is on you to find a solution because I am currently happy where we are at. I bring up the point that the left is behind this agenda.
The answer is there have always been a few people in society who have felt confused about their gender, yet it was never an issue until now, when the left decided it needed to be an issue. Well, I disagree with the left's premise. It remains a non-issue. And that brings me precisely to the problem with leftism: It's always seeking some change; it thrives on invented crises. If we were to eliminate separate public bathrooms tomorrow, some other thing that's currently a non-issue the left would make an issue.
Me asking another main point about this bill about how students can play on the gender side they want to.
And realize, too, we have not even addressed the other facet of this topic: that not only would separate bathrooms be effectively eliminated, but men and women would be interchangeable on sports teams. Is that a good idea?
Post 21 DL: you stating the below.
I don’t understand the answer to my question.
You clearly do not understand the debate. I will provide another example. If someone said cars run on four wheels, what is your solution? I would say no solution is needed, as there is no problem.
You offer no solution... it seems that all you are doing is babbling about partisan BS, but Fail to offer a solution...
you sound like liberals during the Iraq war....bicth, moan, cry, complain, but offer No Solutions...
Notice I have stuck with the issue at hand, and answered in a logical fashion. You’re resorting to demonization and personal attacks, which is prima facie evidence that you’re losing the debate so far.
can you spare me the partisan rambling and simply give me a clear solution?
If you can give me a clear solution to the fact that cars run on four wheels.
Yes or No?
start with that...
if you have a solution say "yes" and state it
it you are completely clueless to any solution but instead have made this thread because fox "news" or any other pied piper of the partisan lemmings have prescribed you to talk about this, simply say "no"
“Yet again personal attacks. If you can’t stick to the issue, we don’t’ need to debate.”
Yes or No?
can you do it? simply answer the question starting with a Yes or No answer?
For the zillionth time, no solution is necessary.
Post 23 Me: Asking outside viewers to judge logical answers.
Again saying I cannot offer a solution, to which I don’t find an issue on. Brining up the left as they are the ones that feel there is a problem, even though you have yet to articulate why this is a problem.
Post 24 DL: Asking me for the 12th time for a solution.
Post 21 DL: you stating the below.
I don’t understand the answer to my question.
You clearly do not understand the debate. I will provide another example. If someone said cars run on four wheels, what is your solution? I would say no solution is needed, as there is no problem.
You offer no solution... it seems that all you are doing is babbling about partisan BS, but Fail to offer a solution...
you sound like liberals during the Iraq war....bicth, moan, cry, complain, but offer No Solutions...
Notice I have stuck with the issue at hand, and answered in a logical fashion. You’re resorting to demonization and personal attacks, which is prima facie evidence that you’re losing the debate so far.
can you spare me the partisan rambling and simply give me a clear solution?
If you can give me a clear solution to the fact that cars run on four wheels.
Yes or No?
start with that...
if you have a solution say "yes" and state it
it you are completely clueless to any solution but instead have made this thread because fox "news" or any other pied piper of the partisan lemmings have prescribed you to talk about this, simply say "no"
“Yet again personal attacks. If you can’t stick to the issue, we don’t’ need to debate.”
Yes or No?
can you do it? simply answer the question starting with a Yes or No answer?
For the zillionth time, no solution is necessary.
Post 23 Me: Asking outside viewers to judge logical answers.
Again saying I cannot offer a solution, to which I don’t find an issue on. Brining up the left as they are the ones that feel there is a problem, even though you have yet to articulate why this is a problem.
Post 24 DL: Asking me for the 12th time for a solution.
Post 26 DL:
was thinking the same thing... fox"news" or another wacko nutjob talking head prescribed him to get fired up about this talking point... so he made a thread about it, loaded with the propaganda that he was fed... “You sure do love demonization. It’s almost as if you can’t win a debate so have to resort to attacks.
but when a question about reality was asked that transcended the his rhetoric of fear and intolerance he did the classic "cut-and-run", deflecting and dodging the question...
Non-substantive drivel. There’s no dodge; there’s no “cut-and-run.” Perhaps look in the mirror.
Post 27 DL: You asking a question for a response I had asked to Darkhorse.
so whats your solution for creepy men entering the bathroom in hopes of catching a glance of a woman? “ When you ask me for a solution to a question I feel there is an answer for I can provide a solution. They should not be allowed in and should be punished by law”
Post 26 DL:
was thinking the same thing... fox"news" or another wacko nutjob talking head prescribed him to get fired up about this talking point... so he made a thread about it, loaded with the propaganda that he was fed... “You sure do love demonization. It’s almost as if you can’t win a debate so have to resort to attacks.
but when a question about reality was asked that transcended the his rhetoric of fear and intolerance he did the classic "cut-and-run", deflecting and dodging the question...
Non-substantive drivel. There’s no dodge; there’s no “cut-and-run.” Perhaps look in the mirror.
Post 27 DL: You asking a question for a response I had asked to Darkhorse.
so whats your solution for creepy men entering the bathroom in hopes of catching a glance of a woman? “ When you ask me for a solution to a question I feel there is an answer for I can provide a solution. They should not be allowed in and should be punished by law”
Post 28 DL: asking a bunch of questions to which I reply in post 31, but I will answer them now.
| when a female to male transgendered person enters a ladies room, you are telling the women to simply tolerate having a person that looks like and acts like man in the ladies room? If they were born with a vegina, then yes. should the women have the right to question the person female to male transgendered person that looks like and acts like a man? Yes. if not, what if a man just enters the restroom, should they not question that individual because in your solution they are required to be all PC about it? Don’t need to answer because I agree with the previous question. help me understand your solution that you propose for this occurrence.... Im not sure exactly what your proposed solution is I cannot provide a solution to a question that I feel needs no change. |
Post 28 DL: asking a bunch of questions to which I reply in post 31, but I will answer them now.
| when a female to male transgendered person enters a ladies room, you are telling the women to simply tolerate having a person that looks like and acts like man in the ladies room? If they were born with a vegina, then yes. should the women have the right to question the person female to male transgendered person that looks like and acts like a man? Yes. if not, what if a man just enters the restroom, should they not question that individual because in your solution they are required to be all PC about it? Don’t need to answer because I agree with the previous question. help me understand your solution that you propose for this occurrence.... Im not sure exactly what your proposed solution is I cannot provide a solution to a question that I feel needs no change. |
now take a deep breath and slow down...
can you spare me the partisan rambling and simply give me a clear solution?
See previous answer.
Yes or No?
start with that...
if you have a solution say "yes" and state it
it you are completely clueless to any solution but instead have made this thread because fox "news" or any other pied piper of the partisan lemmings have prescribed you to talk about this, simply say "no"
Yes or No?
now take a deep breath and slow down...
can you spare me the partisan rambling and simply give me a clear solution?
See previous answer.
Yes or No?
start with that...
if you have a solution say "yes" and state it
it you are completely clueless to any solution but instead have made this thread because fox "news" or any other pied piper of the partisan lemmings have prescribed you to talk about this, simply say "no"
Yes or No?
now take a deep breath and slow down...
can you spare me the partisan rambling and simply give me a clear solution?
See previous answer.
Yes or No?
start with that...
if you have a solution say "yes" and state it
it you are completely clueless to any solution but instead have made this thread because fox "news" or any other pied piper of the partisan lemmings have prescribed you to talk about this, simply say "no"
Yes or No?
can you do it? simply answer the question starting with a Yes or No answer?
Impossible.
now take a deep breath and slow down...
can you spare me the partisan rambling and simply give me a clear solution?
See previous answer.
Yes or No?
start with that...
if you have a solution say "yes" and state it
it you are completely clueless to any solution but instead have made this thread because fox "news" or any other pied piper of the partisan lemmings have prescribed you to talk about this, simply say "no"
Yes or No?
can you do it? simply answer the question starting with a Yes or No answer?
Impossible.
You failed to do it last time and instead went on rambling started bringing up right/left...
This is because the left now thinks it is an issue, and, after 30 posts in, I still have yet to hear why you believe it’s a problem.
Post 31 Me: Responding see above:
You failed to do it last time and instead went on rambling started bringing up right/left...
This is because the left now thinks it is an issue, and, after 30 posts in, I still have yet to hear why you believe it’s a problem.
Post 31 Me: Responding see above:
Post 32 DL:
first off you did not start with "yes" or "no"...
why is that?
Seems like you are trying to keep it one-sided in terms of refusing to answer the question by characterizing the real life situation and issue as hypothetical...
I have tried my best to answer unanswerable questions. Yet you have not answered mine, which you seem unable to do, so I will post the questions at the end of this thread.
The reason why I am saying it constitutes a problems is because it is reality... the other is that "Your solution" ironically opens a dangerous pandora's box
“Opens a dangerous pandora’s box? What are you talking about? I’m advocating nothing, and suggesting we change nothing. If you think the status quo is dangerous, you STILL HAVE NOT EXPLAINED WHY!
I am talking about reality... not hypothetical... there are individuals that have vaginas that, walk, talk, act and look like males... This is the reality of the issue... you simply deny reality as it appears it is because you have No Solution...
I wish you followed logic...
Or perhaps you are saying that your solution is that "women have to "tolerate" that manly-looking female using the female bathroom"...
BINGO! You finally get it!
and ironically, "Your proposed solution" seems like a pretty dangerous pandora's box...
(Bangs head against wall) …
So "Your solution" is that the new the social norm you dictate upon women is that women can not react normally to a male in the ladies room?
This is such an illogic, distorted piece of fabrication I cannot even guess at what you’re trying to say. There’s no “new” social norm. I’ve repeatedly stated things should stay the way they are. And I have no idea what you mean by women “cannot react normally.”
That they have to act all PC and not react normally to a male entering the ladies room?
Where have I ever said any of this nonsense?
Are you completely blind to how "Your solution" is opening a dangerous pandora's box?
Yes, I am completely blind as to how maintaining public bathroom policy is “dangerous.” For the umpteenth time, please delineate why this is dangerous!
Post 32 DL:
first off you did not start with "yes" or "no"...
why is that?
Seems like you are trying to keep it one-sided in terms of refusing to answer the question by characterizing the real life situation and issue as hypothetical...
I have tried my best to answer unanswerable questions. Yet you have not answered mine, which you seem unable to do, so I will post the questions at the end of this thread.
The reason why I am saying it constitutes a problems is because it is reality... the other is that "Your solution" ironically opens a dangerous pandora's box
“Opens a dangerous pandora’s box? What are you talking about? I’m advocating nothing, and suggesting we change nothing. If you think the status quo is dangerous, you STILL HAVE NOT EXPLAINED WHY!
I am talking about reality... not hypothetical... there are individuals that have vaginas that, walk, talk, act and look like males... This is the reality of the issue... you simply deny reality as it appears it is because you have No Solution...
I wish you followed logic...
Or perhaps you are saying that your solution is that "women have to "tolerate" that manly-looking female using the female bathroom"...
BINGO! You finally get it!
and ironically, "Your proposed solution" seems like a pretty dangerous pandora's box...
(Bangs head against wall) …
So "Your solution" is that the new the social norm you dictate upon women is that women can not react normally to a male in the ladies room?
This is such an illogic, distorted piece of fabrication I cannot even guess at what you’re trying to say. There’s no “new” social norm. I’ve repeatedly stated things should stay the way they are. And I have no idea what you mean by women “cannot react normally.”
That they have to act all PC and not react normally to a male entering the ladies room?
Where have I ever said any of this nonsense?
Are you completely blind to how "Your solution" is opening a dangerous pandora's box?
Yes, I am completely blind as to how maintaining public bathroom policy is “dangerous.” For the umpteenth time, please delineate why this is dangerous!
Post 33 Me: Saying I would ask no ones else to respond as I wanted a chance to break down the entire argument without flooding of the thread.
Post34 DL:
first you whine like a liberal during the Iraq war with No Solutions...
Again, attacking your opponent rather than debate the issue. Classic sign of someone who can’t win.
now you are demanding Regulation on who can post and how...
Just for this one post so I could do this. Anyone is open and I hope now respond.
Its funny that how you regress to increased Regulation for posters rather than an atmosphere of Freedom for anyone to post however they feel...
I just want to stay on topic, something you notoriously cannot do.
What is also funny is you thinking that that "outside viewers" will be persuaded by what we post... when in reality most people have already made up their mind on issues like this (or had their mind made for them by a prescribed paradigm)...
Logical minds will follow the logic in this post. For that, your
what people will look at is how we post and how we engage in the discussion or cut-and-run from it...
Yes they will.
Thank you for agreeing to respond to my post, and I hope that you will answer my question without deflection...
I will always respond the best I can.
and address my point about "Your solution" forcing women to act all PC about the issue being a pandora's box...
Who ever said women needed to be forced to act PC? Clueless as to what you’re saying…
Post 33 Me: Saying I would ask no ones else to respond as I wanted a chance to break down the entire argument without flooding of the thread.
Post34 DL:
first you whine like a liberal during the Iraq war with No Solutions...
Again, attacking your opponent rather than debate the issue. Classic sign of someone who can’t win.
now you are demanding Regulation on who can post and how...
Just for this one post so I could do this. Anyone is open and I hope now respond.
Its funny that how you regress to increased Regulation for posters rather than an atmosphere of Freedom for anyone to post however they feel...
I just want to stay on topic, something you notoriously cannot do.
What is also funny is you thinking that that "outside viewers" will be persuaded by what we post... when in reality most people have already made up their mind on issues like this (or had their mind made for them by a prescribed paradigm)...
Logical minds will follow the logic in this post. For that, your
what people will look at is how we post and how we engage in the discussion or cut-and-run from it...
Yes they will.
Thank you for agreeing to respond to my post, and I hope that you will answer my question without deflection...
I will always respond the best I can.
and address my point about "Your solution" forcing women to act all PC about the issue being a pandora's box...
Who ever said women needed to be forced to act PC? Clueless as to what you’re saying…
History on this thread shows that you will deny reality to avoid answering the question and will instead ramble on like a partisan hack about left/right BS instead...
Notice I brought up the word “left” well after you went on your diatribe regarding FOX News, etc. And notice I mentioned that word twice, while you personally attacked, demonized, and ranted about “partisan lemmings.”
Further, students of propaganda may be impressed by the skill with which you try to divert attention from the actual topic by demonizing, but students of logic will see who’s logic is more in touch with reality.
I hope that you can get it together and change your consistent patterns on this thread and allow us to have a discussion about the topic...
That you think I am the one who doesn’t make sense is revealing for anyone who reads this thread.
What’s amazing is that we’re 34 posts in, and you have yet to make the basic case as to why separate public bathrooms are a problem. Perhaps you could do so, so that we can continue dialogue? The burden of proof is on your side. I have delineated innumerable times in response to your “what-is-your-solution” question why I believe the current policy of separate public bathrooms is not a problem, and thus demands no solution. Eagerly await a substantive response.
History on this thread shows that you will deny reality to avoid answering the question and will instead ramble on like a partisan hack about left/right BS instead...
Notice I brought up the word “left” well after you went on your diatribe regarding FOX News, etc. And notice I mentioned that word twice, while you personally attacked, demonized, and ranted about “partisan lemmings.”
Further, students of propaganda may be impressed by the skill with which you try to divert attention from the actual topic by demonizing, but students of logic will see who’s logic is more in touch with reality.
I hope that you can get it together and change your consistent patterns on this thread and allow us to have a discussion about the topic...
That you think I am the one who doesn’t make sense is revealing for anyone who reads this thread.
What’s amazing is that we’re 34 posts in, and you have yet to make the basic case as to why separate public bathrooms are a problem. Perhaps you could do so, so that we can continue dialogue? The burden of proof is on your side. I have delineated innumerable times in response to your “what-is-your-solution” question why I believe the current policy of separate public bathrooms is not a problem, and thus demands no solution. Eagerly await a substantive response.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.