What a joke, a terrible call to end a great game... Clearly gabby was rode into the goalie, and this coming after that "miracle" bounce off the glass down in jersey last week to give the devils a last minute goal.
not even worth responding to NJDevils he is the most notorious homer in these NHL forums ![]()
What a joke, a terrible call to end a great game... Clearly gabby was rode into the goalie, and this coming after that "miracle" bounce off the glass down in jersey last week to give the devils a last minute goal.
not even worth responding to NJDevils he is the most notorious homer in these NHL forums ![]()
Oh good gawd, Gabby made no attempt to avoid Brodeur. Yes Volchenkov was on his side not back, but he was backing off and Gabby felt Volchenkov on him and he took advantage by keeping forward. He could of veered left with no problem.
Volchenkov was stopping, you can see him putting on the brakes. If he was actually pushing Gabby like some claim, he would of been in the goal and the goal would of came off the pegs.
Oh good gawd, Gabby made no attempt to avoid Brodeur. Yes Volchenkov was on his side not back, but he was backing off and Gabby felt Volchenkov on him and he took advantage by keeping forward. He could of veered left with no problem.
Volchenkov was stopping, you can see him putting on the brakes. If he was actually pushing Gabby like some claim, he would of been in the goal and the goal would of came off the pegs.
Come on lipps, gabby started hitting the brakes in the slot to slow himself to the net for a last second tip in, not his fault if a guy behind him pushes him into the goalie.
"" If he was actually pushing Gabby like some claim, he would of been in the goal and the goal would of came off the pegs.""
He did push gabby, and if gabby made no attempt to slow himself than he would have went thru marty and knocked off the goal. when your crashing the net with 3 seconds left and you get shoved from behind theres not much you can do to avoid the goalie ![]()
Come on lipps, gabby started hitting the brakes in the slot to slow himself to the net for a last second tip in, not his fault if a guy behind him pushes him into the goalie.
"" If he was actually pushing Gabby like some claim, he would of been in the goal and the goal would of came off the pegs.""
He did push gabby, and if gabby made no attempt to slow himself than he would have went thru marty and knocked off the goal. when your crashing the net with 3 seconds left and you get shoved from behind theres not much you can do to avoid the goalie ![]()
Oh good gawd, Gabby made no attempt to avoid Brodeur. Yes Volchenkov was on his side not back, but he was backing off and Gabby felt Volchenkov on him and he took advantage by keeping forward. He could of veered left with no problem.
Volchenkov was stopping, you can see him putting on the brakes. If he was actually pushing Gabby like some claim, he would of been in the goal and the goal would of came off the pegs.
just watched the replay and Lipps comments nail it.... That was a penalty folks, how can you say Volch pushed in him when there was no extension of his arms at all? Good call no goal
Oh good gawd, Gabby made no attempt to avoid Brodeur. Yes Volchenkov was on his side not back, but he was backing off and Gabby felt Volchenkov on him and he took advantage by keeping forward. He could of veered left with no problem.
Volchenkov was stopping, you can see him putting on the brakes. If he was actually pushing Gabby like some claim, he would of been in the goal and the goal would of came off the pegs.
just watched the replay and Lipps comments nail it.... That was a penalty folks, how can you say Volch pushed in him when there was no extension of his arms at all? Good call no goal
Come on Ihiouse, he could of veered left and missed Brodeur. And 3 seconds is tons of time to veer off course. He was trying to take advantage of the touch.
You think the refs and league office has some special grudge against the Rangers ? There has been much less offences than that where a goal was called off.
I say the corrrect call was made and the guys that do this for a profession say the same thing.
![]()
Come on Ihiouse, he could of veered left and missed Brodeur. And 3 seconds is tons of time to veer off course. He was trying to take advantage of the touch.
You think the refs and league office has some special grudge against the Rangers ? There has been much less offences than that where a goal was called off.
I say the corrrect call was made and the guys that do this for a profession say the same thing.
![]()
just watched the replay and Lipps comments nail it.... That was a penalty folks, how can you say Volch pushed in him when there was no extension of his arms at all? Good call no goal
Exactly, no arm extension at all. That was really the decider.
just watched the replay and Lipps comments nail it.... That was a penalty folks, how can you say Volch pushed in him when there was no extension of his arms at all? Good call no goal
Exactly, no arm extension at all. That was really the decider.
you dont need to use your arms to bump somebody into the goalie
and no i dont think there is any type of special grudge against the rags by the officials ![]()
![]()
you dont need to use your arms to bump somebody into the goalie
and no i dont think there is any type of special grudge against the rags by the officials ![]()
![]()
neither guy had possesion on the puck, the defender has just as much right to the ice as Gabby
neither guy had possesion on the puck, the defender has just as much right to the ice as Gabby
If one blatent call can not be called than a tough call should not be called either!
LETS GO DEVILS
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA HEY YOU SUCK
If one blatent call can not be called than a tough call should not be called either!
LETS GO DEVILS
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA HEY YOU SUCK
Of course any waived off goal BUT one against the Rangers is a bad call in your eyes.. you continue to be a joke on here bro. Im sure you thought all the BS at the end of the winter classic was right as well huh. ![]()
Of course any waived off goal BUT one against the Rangers is a bad call in your eyes.. you continue to be a joke on here bro. Im sure you thought all the BS at the end of the winter classic was right as well huh. ![]()
wierd that all the guys on NHL overtime think that it was a bad call by the refs in the rangers game also... the no goal in the B's game was brutal but im glad it happened because after 2 terrible calls they will change this somehow.
its clear when you see the overhead view that he was trying to stop and was pushed in. Refs make bad calls shit happens, but dont tell me after you can watch the replays that the right call was made ![]()
wierd that all the guys on NHL overtime think that it was a bad call by the refs in the rangers game also... the no goal in the B's game was brutal but im glad it happened because after 2 terrible calls they will change this somehow.
its clear when you see the overhead view that he was trying to stop and was pushed in. Refs make bad calls shit happens, but dont tell me after you can watch the replays that the right call was made ![]()
wierd that all the guys on NHL overtime think that it was a bad call by the refs in the rangers game also... the no goal in the B's game was brutal but im glad it happened because after 2 terrible calls they will change this somehow.
its clear when you see the overhead view that he was trying to stop and was pushed in. Refs make bad calls shit happens, but dont tell me after you can watch the replays that the right call was made ![]()
I watched the replay many times over and I say the right call was made.
![]()
wierd that all the guys on NHL overtime think that it was a bad call by the refs in the rangers game also... the no goal in the B's game was brutal but im glad it happened because after 2 terrible calls they will change this somehow.
its clear when you see the overhead view that he was trying to stop and was pushed in. Refs make bad calls shit happens, but dont tell me after you can watch the replays that the right call was made ![]()
I watched the replay many times over and I say the right call was made.
![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.