1. Washington--STL might well be the worst team EVER and on the road they have not even come close to being competitive. Even though they like their new coach the schemes are still horrible. Just lost their TE to injury and his replacement cannot pass block to save his life.
2. Washington/ STL over--Either Wash blows them out so bad they cover it almost by themselves or STL somehow scores. Either way this looks good.
3. Green Bay -1--Already liked them top not lose four in a row (!). SEA is overrated in the extreme and losing their starting QB seals the deal.
4. Jets -9--Never thought I would like the Jets laying so many points but Fitzpatrick is just that bad.
5. Dallas -5--I think this is where ARI (and its backers) come back to earth. Hard.
6. DAL/ARI over--should happen even if Dallas blows them out.
7. Eagles -4 over SF. Pretty sure the Eagles will not let this streak continue and get it together for a gritty win that covers the spread by a few points.
---
I disagree with YoungOne and think this weekend is a very good card. GB to win for even money in a desperate situation versus a crap SEA team, the Rams still with that horrible D scheme against the anti Rams (with a pissed off London Fletcher to boot), Dallas being underrated due to recent performances, same with Eagles... nice stuff here. (Ravens, JAX and NE MLs look decent due to the odds as well)
0
Cool thread:
1. Washington--STL might well be the worst team EVER and on the road they have not even come close to being competitive. Even though they like their new coach the schemes are still horrible. Just lost their TE to injury and his replacement cannot pass block to save his life.
2. Washington/ STL over--Either Wash blows them out so bad they cover it almost by themselves or STL somehow scores. Either way this looks good.
3. Green Bay -1--Already liked them top not lose four in a row (!). SEA is overrated in the extreme and losing their starting QB seals the deal.
4. Jets -9--Never thought I would like the Jets laying so many points but Fitzpatrick is just that bad.
5. Dallas -5--I think this is where ARI (and its backers) come back to earth. Hard.
6. DAL/ARI over--should happen even if Dallas blows them out.
7. Eagles -4 over SF. Pretty sure the Eagles will not let this streak continue and get it together for a gritty win that covers the spread by a few points.
---
I disagree with YoungOne and think this weekend is a very good card. GB to win for even money in a desperate situation versus a crap SEA team, the Rams still with that horrible D scheme against the anti Rams (with a pissed off London Fletcher to boot), Dallas being underrated due to recent performances, same with Eagles... nice stuff here. (Ravens, JAX and NE MLs look decent due to the odds as well)
RIGHT, even if stl covers, you cant make the play of the week on a team that has shown no signs of life at all so far. if u like the rams and wanna put $100 on them, go ahead. but as the play of the week, come on man, eitehr take the az over or just wait til next week.
again......THIS CARD SUCKS!
WHY, dos this Card Suck? What Kind Of System to you use, (Computers, Simulations, Math, Capp Marketplace, steam smart, that usually, best to do hr's befor game time... BOL WHY Card Suck?
0
Quote Originally Posted by YoungOne:
RIGHT, even if stl covers, you cant make the play of the week on a team that has shown no signs of life at all so far. if u like the rams and wanna put $100 on them, go ahead. but as the play of the week, come on man, eitehr take the az over or just wait til next week.
again......THIS CARD SUCKS!
WHY, dos this Card Suck? What Kind Of System to you use, (Computers, Simulations, Math, Capp Marketplace, steam smart, that usually, best to do hr's befor game time... BOL WHY Card Suck?
The Bays are my best bets this weekend. Either one, Tampa or Green. If I had to choose one, I'd probably back the Pack. Hasselbeck is likely out for the game, and also the Seahawks are pretty much grabbing guys off the street to play WR, due to injuries. Their offense is out of sync, and Packers should be able to concentrate on stopping the run.
I would add that I rarely play m/l favorites, but the Colts -200 looks like a relatively good value, too. I liked the Ravens when they played at Pittsburgh a couple weeks ago, but playing at Indy is a tougher spot for them. Colts should get their first win at the new stadium on Sunday.
0
The Bays are my best bets this weekend. Either one, Tampa or Green. If I had to choose one, I'd probably back the Pack. Hasselbeck is likely out for the game, and also the Seahawks are pretty much grabbing guys off the street to play WR, due to injuries. Their offense is out of sync, and Packers should be able to concentrate on stopping the run.
I would add that I rarely play m/l favorites, but the Colts -200 looks like a relatively good value, too. I liked the Ravens when they played at Pittsburgh a couple weeks ago, but playing at Indy is a tougher spot for them. Colts should get their first win at the new stadium on Sunday.
The SD schedule should have a big circle around this game. NE has beaten SD 3 straight and the last 2 were playoff games. Huge revenge factor for SD.
Meanwhile, a significantly weaker NE team attempts second straight west coast game. "Staying" on the west coast didn't help Arizona who stayed on the East coast after their BAL game and proceeded to get destroyed by the Jets, 56-35.
If SD has a hair on their a**, they will take revenge on the Patriots and in this situation, I believe they are in a perfect position to do so.
Add: NE 2-8 ATS last 10.
SD 8-1 ATS last 9 home games
SD by 14+
0
SD over NE
The SD schedule should have a big circle around this game. NE has beaten SD 3 straight and the last 2 were playoff games. Huge revenge factor for SD.
Meanwhile, a significantly weaker NE team attempts second straight west coast game. "Staying" on the west coast didn't help Arizona who stayed on the East coast after their BAL game and proceeded to get destroyed by the Jets, 56-35.
If SD has a hair on their a**, they will take revenge on the Patriots and in this situation, I believe they are in a perfect position to do so.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.