You take just a quick glance at talent before looking at the team which has had a ton of turnover the past two years, locker room rifts, a bi-polor coach, a schitzo fan base and tell me how that horrific lack of talent somehow turns into a 'team' where the whole is better than the sum of the parts.
You can use that logic when comparing the Eagles to the Patriots and say the Eagles have better players but the Pats have the better team, but that doesn't apply here. The jets have way less talent, way less chemistry, way worse game plan.... they don't have the edge in any aspect of anything.
Also, after this game, I bet Jets vs. Jax on a neutral field would be Jax -1
0
You take just a quick glance at talent before looking at the team which has had a ton of turnover the past two years, locker room rifts, a bi-polor coach, a schitzo fan base and tell me how that horrific lack of talent somehow turns into a 'team' where the whole is better than the sum of the parts.
You can use that logic when comparing the Eagles to the Patriots and say the Eagles have better players but the Pats have the better team, but that doesn't apply here. The jets have way less talent, way less chemistry, way worse game plan.... they don't have the edge in any aspect of anything.
Also, after this game, I bet Jets vs. Jax on a neutral field would be Jax -1
This is like arguing who would you rather sleep with... Betty White or Justin Bieber? Obviously the choice is Betty White because she has a vagina, all cob-webbed and crispy, but somebody out there thinks that Bieber is the tighter unit... Personally I'll put Betty on top and let her crack my hip.
0
This is like arguing who would you rather sleep with... Betty White or Justin Bieber? Obviously the choice is Betty White because she has a vagina, all cob-webbed and crispy, but somebody out there thinks that Bieber is the tighter unit... Personally I'll put Betty on top and let her crack my hip.
Nope I wouldn't because it's absolutely ridiculous. The Jets have no Revis or Santonio Holmes. That's their best 2 players. With them they were maybe a 7 win team, without them they're atrocious. That's not to say they won't cover the 8.5. But to say this spread should be -4 is completely idiotic. Maybe -6.5 or -7, but no shot -4. And you speak all cocky about it too. Stick to soccer bud.
0
Nope I wouldn't because it's absolutely ridiculous. The Jets have no Revis or Santonio Holmes. That's their best 2 players. With them they were maybe a 7 win team, without them they're atrocious. That's not to say they won't cover the 8.5. But to say this spread should be -4 is completely idiotic. Maybe -6.5 or -7, but no shot -4. And you speak all cocky about it too. Stick to soccer bud.
Nope I wouldn't because it's absolutely ridiculous. The Jets have no Revis or Santonio Holmes. That's their best 2 players. With them they were maybe a 7 win team, without them they're atrocious. That's not to say they won't cover the 8.5. But to say this spread should be -4 is completely idiotic. Maybe -6.5 or -7, but no shot -4. And you speak all cocky about it too. Stick to soccer bud.
Dont wake up in a roadside ditch.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rg3skins:
Nope I wouldn't because it's absolutely ridiculous. The Jets have no Revis or Santonio Holmes. That's their best 2 players. With them they were maybe a 7 win team, without them they're atrocious. That's not to say they won't cover the 8.5. But to say this spread should be -4 is completely idiotic. Maybe -6.5 or -7, but no shot -4. And you speak all cocky about it too. Stick to soccer bud.
I know he's a good read. Before I made an account on this site I tailed everyone of his Euro 2012 picks...he was money. I'm just saying I don't see how it's HOU -4 but your point about the SF game is valid I forgot about that. GL vanzack even though I'm against u on this one.
0
I know he's a good read. Before I made an account on this site I tailed everyone of his Euro 2012 picks...he was money. I'm just saying I don't see how it's HOU -4 but your point about the SF game is valid I forgot about that. GL vanzack even though I'm against u on this one.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.