We don't. I thought the idea was that minority candidates would be considered.
The head coach position is a vital position where teams make a massive commitment. The key attributes are someone who can outthink his opponent.
With such a vital role at stake, I can see how front offices subconsciously let stereotypes toward blacks affect their decision-making. It's natural. It's no different than why Jeremy Lin didn't get a chance b/c he's Asian and there's no Asian PGs in the NBA.
Front offices don't see many black head coaches, so they wonder whether there's something inherent that makes them rare in the industry.
But when lots of minority candidates succeed, that stereotype dissipates. You have a Super Bowl w/ 2 black coaches. That erodes the stereotype. I don't think the requirement to interview black coaches is as necessary today as it was 15 years ago.
We don't. I thought the idea was that minority candidates would be considered.
The head coach position is a vital position where teams make a massive commitment. The key attributes are someone who can outthink his opponent.
With such a vital role at stake, I can see how front offices subconsciously let stereotypes toward blacks affect their decision-making. It's natural. It's no different than why Jeremy Lin didn't get a chance b/c he's Asian and there's no Asian PGs in the NBA.
Front offices don't see many black head coaches, so they wonder whether there's something inherent that makes them rare in the industry.
But when lots of minority candidates succeed, that stereotype dissipates. You have a Super Bowl w/ 2 black coaches. That erodes the stereotype. I don't think the requirement to interview black coaches is as necessary today as it was 15 years ago.
We don't. I thought the idea was that minority candidates would be considered.
The head coach position is a vital position where teams make a massive commitment. The key attributes are someone who can outthink his opponent.
With such a vital role at stake, I can see how front offices subconsciously let stereotypes toward blacks affect their decision-making. It's natural. It's no different than why Jeremy Lin didn't get a chance b/c he's Asian and there's no Asian PGs in the NBA.
Front offices don't see many black head coaches, so they wonder whether there's something inherent that makes them rare in the industry.
But when lots of minority candidates succeed, that stereotype dissipates. You have a Super Bowl w/ 2 black coaches. That erodes the stereotype. I don't think the requirement to interview black coaches is as necessary today as it was 15 years ago.
We don't. I thought the idea was that minority candidates would be considered.
The head coach position is a vital position where teams make a massive commitment. The key attributes are someone who can outthink his opponent.
With such a vital role at stake, I can see how front offices subconsciously let stereotypes toward blacks affect their decision-making. It's natural. It's no different than why Jeremy Lin didn't get a chance b/c he's Asian and there's no Asian PGs in the NBA.
Front offices don't see many black head coaches, so they wonder whether there's something inherent that makes them rare in the industry.
But when lots of minority candidates succeed, that stereotype dissipates. You have a Super Bowl w/ 2 black coaches. That erodes the stereotype. I don't think the requirement to interview black coaches is as necessary today as it was 15 years ago.
We don't. I thought the idea was that minority candidates would be considered.
The head coach position is a vital position where teams make a massive commitment. The key attributes are someone who can outthink his opponent.
With such a vital role at stake, I can see how front offices subconsciously let stereotypes toward blacks affect their decision-making. It's natural. It's no different than why Jeremy Lin didn't get a chance b/c he's Asian and there's no Asian PGs in the NBA.
Front offices don't see many black head coaches, so they wonder whether there's something inherent that makes them rare in the industry.
But when lots of minority candidates succeed, that stereotype dissipates. You have a Super Bowl w/ 2 black coaches. That erodes the stereotype. I don't think the requirement to interview black coaches is as necessary today as it was 15 years ago.
We don't. I thought the idea was that minority candidates would be considered.
The head coach position is a vital position where teams make a massive commitment. The key attributes are someone who can outthink his opponent.
With such a vital role at stake, I can see how front offices subconsciously let stereotypes toward blacks affect their decision-making. It's natural. It's no different than why Jeremy Lin didn't get a chance b/c he's Asian and there's no Asian PGs in the NBA.
Front offices don't see many black head coaches, so they wonder whether there's something inherent that makes them rare in the industry.
But when lots of minority candidates succeed, that stereotype dissipates. You have a Super Bowl w/ 2 black coaches. That erodes the stereotype. I don't think the requirement to interview black coaches is as necessary today as it was 15 years ago.
Cuz everything being equal the guy that looks most like the guys doing the hiring get hired. Take a wild guess what that would be. ![]()
Contrary to popular belief, many of these guys are equally capable of doing that job. So if height, weight, coaching ability, social ability, etc. etc. is all equal, what do you think the last consideration will be? Bingo
Cuz everything being equal the guy that looks most like the guys doing the hiring get hired. Take a wild guess what that would be. ![]()
Contrary to popular belief, many of these guys are equally capable of doing that job. So if height, weight, coaching ability, social ability, etc. etc. is all equal, what do you think the last consideration will be? Bingo
That rooney rule is embarassing. If you can coach white black or whatever and moved up ranks why not get a shot. I think it really sets society back 40 years with joke of rule
That rooney rule is embarassing. If you can coach white black or whatever and moved up ranks why not get a shot. I think it really sets society back 40 years with joke of rule
people who push for black coaches are not held accountable. they push for this yet if a team hires a black coach and things don't work out, where are these people? do they get penalize? nope.
it's like somebody being in your business when they don't have any rights to be in your business. yet when things go wrong, there's no repercussion for them. kinda sounds like the government.
an analogy is somebody forcing you to bet a team. well, they have to business doing so because they have no skin in they game. yet, they do it and you listen to them. you lose your money and they don't pay anything. doesn't make sense.
people who push for black coaches are not held accountable. they push for this yet if a team hires a black coach and things don't work out, where are these people? do they get penalize? nope.
it's like somebody being in your business when they don't have any rights to be in your business. yet when things go wrong, there's no repercussion for them. kinda sounds like the government.
an analogy is somebody forcing you to bet a team. well, they have to business doing so because they have no skin in they game. yet, they do it and you listen to them. you lose your money and they don't pay anything. doesn't make sense.
people who push for black coaches are not held accountable. they push for this yet if a team hires a black coach and things don't work out, where are these people? do they get penalize? nope.
it's like somebody being in your business when they don't have any rights to be in your business. yet when things go wrong, there's no repercussion for them. kinda sounds like the government.
an analogy is somebody forcing you to bet a team. well, they have to business doing so because they have no skin in they game. yet, they do it and you listen to them. you lose your money and they don't pay anything. doesn't make sense.
That's very simplistic thinking but it's not that easy bud. ![]()
The situation is more like there's 4 Bellicheks- each one being indian, black, white and asian.
Who do you think will be hired with everything being equal?
That's the issue.
The issue isn't so much of qualification, experience, etc etc. for the most part.
people who push for black coaches are not held accountable. they push for this yet if a team hires a black coach and things don't work out, where are these people? do they get penalize? nope.
it's like somebody being in your business when they don't have any rights to be in your business. yet when things go wrong, there's no repercussion for them. kinda sounds like the government.
an analogy is somebody forcing you to bet a team. well, they have to business doing so because they have no skin in they game. yet, they do it and you listen to them. you lose your money and they don't pay anything. doesn't make sense.
That's very simplistic thinking but it's not that easy bud. ![]()
The situation is more like there's 4 Bellicheks- each one being indian, black, white and asian.
Who do you think will be hired with everything being equal?
That's the issue.
The issue isn't so much of qualification, experience, etc etc. for the most part.
That rooney rule is embarassing. If you can coach white black or whatever and moved up ranks why not get a shot. I think it really sets society back 40 years with joke of rule
That rooney rule is embarassing. If you can coach white black or whatever and moved up ranks why not get a shot. I think it really sets society back 40 years with joke of rule
I agree ![]()
I agree ![]()
That's very simplistic thinking but it's not that easy bud. ![]()
The situation is more like there's 4 Bellicheks- each one being indian, black, white and asian.
Who do you think will be hired with everything being equal?
That's the issue.
The issue isn't so much of qualification, experience, etc etc. for the most part.
I've hired people (white, black and everything else) for just over 15 years and I can tell you this happens ZERO percent of the time. There is no "everything equal". We are all individuals. One candidate is always better than the other. It's very simplistic to think otherwise.
That's very simplistic thinking but it's not that easy bud. ![]()
The situation is more like there's 4 Bellicheks- each one being indian, black, white and asian.
Who do you think will be hired with everything being equal?
That's the issue.
The issue isn't so much of qualification, experience, etc etc. for the most part.
I've hired people (white, black and everything else) for just over 15 years and I can tell you this happens ZERO percent of the time. There is no "everything equal". We are all individuals. One candidate is always better than the other. It's very simplistic to think otherwise.
I've hired people (white, black and everything else) for just over 15 years and I can tell you this happens ZERO percent of the time. There is no "everything equal". We are all individuals. One candidate is always better than the other. It's very simplistic to think otherwise.
There's minimum standards and if it's met by all candidates then what makes you hire one over the other?
I remember a college that was doing reverse discrimination since too many asians were getting in so they put a stop to that and only let whites and other minorities in. So when you have 1000 positions and 1500 qulaifies what would you do?
I've hired people (white, black and everything else) for just over 15 years and I can tell you this happens ZERO percent of the time. There is no "everything equal". We are all individuals. One candidate is always better than the other. It's very simplistic to think otherwise.
There's minimum standards and if it's met by all candidates then what makes you hire one over the other?
I remember a college that was doing reverse discrimination since too many asians were getting in so they put a stop to that and only let whites and other minorities in. So when you have 1000 positions and 1500 qulaifies what would you do?

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.